A Multimodal Music Therapy Intervention for Engaging Persons With Severe Dementia (AMUSED)

May 15, 2026 updated by: Alaine E Hernandez, PhD

Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial of A Multimodal Music Therapy Intervention for Engaging Persons With Severe Dementia (AMUSED)

The goal of this pilot randomized clinical trial is to learn if a music therapy treatment, called AMUSED, can improve engagement and reduce behavioral symptoms in older adults with severe dementia who live in care facilities. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is it feasible to conduct a full-scale trial of AMUSED?
  • Can investigators identify the best outcome measures to assess impact on behavioral symptoms of dementia?
  • Does speech offer a useful indicator of treatment effectiveness? Researchers will compare a group-based music therapy treatment to a reading activity to learn if music therapy leads to greater improvements in behavioral symptoms and speech patterns.

Participants will:

  • Participate in either music therapy (includes live music, singing, and rhythmic instrument playing) or a reading group with stories about life and nature and talk about memories.
  • Attend small group sessions twice a week for 12 weeks, with each session lasting 40 minutes between lunch and dinner.
  • Be observed and assessed for behavioral symptoms, cognition, and speech several times during treatment and at a 4-week follow-up.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Meaningful activity has personal importance or usefulness, fosters a sense of fulfillment, and contributes to well-being, whether through cherished pastimes or goal-oriented endeavors. Persons with dementia (PWD) experience significant deficits in memory, communication, and functional abilities, which poses unique obstacles to engage in meaningful activities. When PWD lack sufficient activity, or if activities are poorly tailored to ability, PWD can demonstrate increased behavioral symptoms. Such symptoms impact the PWD and contribute to caregiver stress. Nonetheless, PWD across the severity continuum often respond favorably to music. Thoughtfully designed music-based interventions (MBIs) may offer PWD opportunities to engage in meaningful activity and socialize. However, empirical evidence to support the use of MBIs with this population is very limited. This pilot study advances a line of research to test and refine a randomized clinical trial design and gather preliminary data on intervention effectiveness beyond a single session.

The overall objectives of this quantitative pilot study are to (i) establish a well-refined clinical trial design, procedures, and outcome measures and (ii) obtain preliminary data of enduring effectiveness of a multimodal music therapy intervention for engaging persons with severe dementia (AMUSED) with regards to behavioral symptoms and speech. AMUSED uses live participant-preferred music and progressively layers singing, touch, and rhythmic instrument playing concurrent with participant behavioral responses. This MBI is grounded in the person-centered Clinical Practice Model for PWD, which provides guidelines for adjusting the degree of support and challenge offered to an individual. This Model is also used to enhance treatment fidelity.

This pilot study builds on a feasibility study that field tested logistics and demonstrated feasibility and acceptability of the AMUSED intervention protocol through a randomized cross-over trial design. The researchers refined recruitment, data collection, protocol training, and intervention processes. As in past similar work, the researchers demonstrated positive engagement during music therapy sessions. However, obtaining longer-term measures of treatment effects (i.e., neuropsychiatric inventory, Fitbit actigraphy, pulse oximetry, functional measures) proved impractical and unreliable in the care milieu. The researchers' recent qualitative work with long-term care staff revealed possible solutions to more feasibly measure such outcomes in a long-term care setting. The current pilot study builds on this past feasibility and qualitative work.

In this quantitative pilot study, the investigators will use a randomized clinical trial design to test methods and procedures that will be used in a future larger clinical trial. This will help enhance the rigor and reproducibility of this research. The aims of this pilot study are to: 1) determine whether the clinical trial protocol is feasible for a full-scale trial, 2) select the most appropriate primary outcome measure(s) of behavioral symptoms of dementia, and 3) determine if spontaneous speech offers a useful indicator of music-based intervention effectiveness in persons with severe dementia. Participants will be older adults with severe dementia who live in a long-term care facility. To isolate the effects of the music and obtain an estimate of cluster effects, care facilities will be randomly assigned to either receive music therapy or reading. Both conditions use the same structure, strategies, and dosage, with music being the key difference.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kentucky
      • Cynthiana, Kentucky, United States, 41031
        • Cedar Ridge Health Campus
      • Danville, Kentucky, United States, 40422
        • Walker's Trail Senior Living
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40506
        • University Of Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40502
        • Mayfair Manor
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40517
        • Sayre Christian Village
      • Midway, Kentucky, United States, 40347
        • The Homeplace at Midway
      • Versailles, Kentucky, United States, 40383
        • Daisy Hill Senior Living
      • Wilmore, Kentucky, United States, 40390
        • Thomson-Hood Veterans Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

PARTICIPANT Inclusion Criteria:

  • 65 years or older
  • late-onset dementia diagnosis from a physician
  • stable at facility long enough to establish residency and routine at the facility (about 2 months prior to start of study)
  • English is primary language (for pilot study practicality and ensure straightforward evaluation of our aims)
  • Dementia is severe: As in the feasibility study, residents' charted score on the Brief Inventory of Mental Status (BIMS) < 7 will be used and no independent function in community affairs, hobbies, chores, or personal care. The BIMS is a component of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated clinical assessment for all residents in US Medicare and Medicaid certified care facilities. It is completed periodically and interpreted by a licensed health care professional employed by the facility who has completed requisite training on the assessment.

PARTICIPANT Exclusion criteria:

  • music therapy recipient
  • co-occurring movement disorder
  • preexisting cognitive disability
  • Milder dementia (BIMS 7+); Persons with more significant cognitive decline could arguably respond differently to the intervention than those with milder dementia, a notion that is supported by past music therapy research with this population.

FACILITIES - Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any facility in Kentucky that provides residential care for persons with severe dementia (up to 8 facilities).
  • At least 5 residents must enroll to make the best use of our resources.
  • At least 1 facility staff member available to help with recruitment and periodic observable data collection
  • Can accommodate consistent session days and times between lunch and dinner, 2 times per week for 40 minutes, for 12 weeks.
  • Willing to communicate questions, concerns, and changes in safety protocols to the research team.
  • Can provide a space appropriate for a small group activity (3-5 residents plus a group leader).
  • Can ensure staff support is available for safely transitioning participants to/from sessions at the agreed upon session days and time.
  • Can assert that music therapy from a credentialed music therapist (MT-BC) is not offered by the facility, to prevent "double dosing" (music entertainment is ok).

FACILITIES - Exclusion Criteria:

-Does not meet one or more inclusion criteria.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Music Therapy

Live delivery of a music therapy protocol that is designed to be led by a board-certified music therapist (MT-BC). Activity blocks are identical to the reading arm:

  • T0 Baseline measures
  • Weeks 1-4: music therapy intervention
  • T1 measures (end of week 4)
  • Weeks 5-8: music therapy intervention
  • T2 measures (end of week 8)
  • Weeks 5-8: music therapy intervention
  • T3 measures (end of week 12)
  • T4 measures 4-week-follow-up (week 16)
Delivered live by a board-certified music therapist (MT-BC) 40 min 2x/week for 12 weeks (24 total sessions; 16 total hours) in small groups of 3-5 people. A Multimodal mUSic therapy intervention for Engaging persons with severe Dementia (AMUSED) uses live participant-preferred music and progressively layers singing, touch, and rhythmic instrument playing concurrent with participant behavioral responses. Follows the Clinical Practice Model for Persons with Dementia and implementation strategies that promote cognition, attention, familiarity, audibility, structure, autonomy per participants' strengths, interests, preferences, culture, and momentary responses. Each small group works with the same music therapist throughout the study.
Active Comparator: Reading Aloud

Live reading aloud of an age-appropriate book by a group leader to control for social attention and isolate the effects of music.

Activity blocks are identical to the music therapy arm:

  • T0 Baseline measures
  • Weeks 1-4: music therapy intervention
  • T1 measures (end of week 4)
  • Weeks 5-8: music therapy intervention
  • T2 measures (end of week 8)
  • Weeks 5-8: music therapy intervention
  • T3 measures (end of week 12)
  • T4 measures 4-week-follow-up (week 16)
Delivered live by a trained research assistant ("interventionist") 40 min 2x/week for 12 weeks (24 total sessions; 16 total hours) in small groups of 3-5 people. The interventionist will read aloud from age-appropriate books (Chicken Soup for the Golden Soul by Jack Canfield; World of Wonders by Aimee Nezhukumatathil) selected to have sufficient material for all sessions, contain short stories to accommodate for attention span and session length, and offer choice. Follows implementation strategies identical to the music therapy arm (i.e., within the Clinical Practice Model for Persons with Dementia) that promote cognition, attention, familiarity, audibility, structure, autonomy per participants' strengths, interests, preferences, culture, and momentary responses. However, no music (including musical references) is used. Each small group works with the same reading interventionist throughout the study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change from Baseline in Dementia Behavior at 12 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, end of Week 12
The Quick Dementia Behavior Observation Scale (QD-BOS) is an 18-item observational measure (est. 3 min. to complete). Section 1 contains the 11 sub-questions from the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home section C "agitation/aggression" and care staff rate the presence or absence of 8 behaviors in the past week (raw score 0-8), the frequency (raw score 1-4) and severity of behaviors (raw score 1-3), total score (frequency x severity, ranges 1-12), and occupational disruptiveness of those behaviors (raw score 0-5; all ranges higher score indicates worse behavior). Section 2 contains 5 questions regarding observed psychosocial well-being in the past week using a 5-point Likert-type scale (item range 1-5), and an optional open-ended item. Section 3 contains 1 question regarding job-related stress in the past week, using a 5-point Likert-type scale (range 1-5). A lower score indicates worse/less desirable behavior. Completed by care staff at baseline and every 4 weeks.
Baseline, end of Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change from Baseline in Dementia Behavior at 4 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, end of Week 4
The QD-BOS is an 18-item observational measure (est. 3 min. to complete). Section 1 contains the 11 sub-questions from the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home section C "agitation/aggression" and care staff rate the presence or absence of 8 behaviors in the past week (raw score 0-8), the frequency (raw score 1-4) and severity of behaviors (raw score 1-3), total score (frequency x severity, ranges 1-12), and occupational disruptiveness of those behaviors (raw score 0-5; all ranges higher score indicates worse behavior). Section 2 contains 5 questions regarding observed psychosocial well-being in the past week using a 5-point Likert-type scale (item range 1-5), and an optional open-ended item. Section 3 contains 1 question regarding job-related stress in the past week, using a 5-point Likert-type scale (range 1-5). A lower score indicates worse/less desirable behavior. Completed by care staff at baseline and every 4 weeks.
Baseline, end of Week 4
Mean Change from Baseline in Dementia Behavior at 8 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, end of Week 8
The QD-BOS is an 18-item observational measure (est. 3 min. to complete). Section 1 contains the 11 sub-questions from the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home section C "agitation/aggression" and care staff rate the presence or absence of 8 behaviors in the past week (raw score 0-8), the frequency (raw score 1-4) and severity of behaviors (raw score 1-3), total score (frequency x severity, ranges 1-12), and occupational disruptiveness of those behaviors (raw score 0-5; all ranges higher score indicates worse behavior). Section 2 contains 5 questions regarding observed psychosocial well-being in the past week using a 5-point Likert-type scale (item range 1-5), and an optional open-ended item. Section 3 contains 1 question regarding job-related stress in the past week, using a 5-point Likert-type scale (range 1-5). A lower score indicates worse/less desirable behavior. Completed by care staff at baseline and every 4 weeks.
Baseline, end of Week 8
Mean Change from Baseline in Dementia Behavior at 4-Week Follow-Up (16 Weeks)
Time Frame: Baseline, 4-week follow up (week 16; 4 weeks after removal of treatment)
The QD-BOS is an 18-item observational measure (est. 3 min. to complete). Section 1 contains the 11 sub-questions from the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home section C "agitation/aggression" and care staff rate the presence or absence of 8 behaviors in the past week (raw score 0-8), the frequency (raw score 1-4) and severity of behaviors (raw score 1-3), total score (frequency x severity, ranges 1-12), and occupational disruptiveness of those behaviors (raw score 0-5; all ranges higher score indicates worse behavior). Section 2 contains 5 questions regarding observed psychosocial well-being in the past week using a 5-point Likert-type scale (item range 1-5), and an optional open-ended item. Section 3 contains 1 question regarding job-related stress in the past week, using a 5-point Likert-type scale (range 1-5). A lower score indicates worse/less desirable behavior. Completed by care staff at baseline and every 4 weeks.
Baseline, 4-week follow up (week 16; 4 weeks after removal of treatment)
Mean Change from Baseline in Language Function at 12 Weeks
Time Frame: Enrollment, end of Week 12
To evaluate change in Aphasia Quotient (AQ) from the bedside Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R), a standardized assessment used to evaluate language abilities in individuals with aphasia. WAB-R has been used with persons with dementia to assess impact of cognitive change on language function. The AQ provides a summary measure of the severity of language impairment based on performance across several language domains, including spontaneous speech, auditory verbal comprehension, repetition, and naming/word finding. Scores range from 0 to 100; A higher AQ score indicates better language function. Administered by masked outcome assessor in person at baseline and end of Week 12.
Enrollment, end of Week 12
Mean Change from Baseline in Cognition at 12 Weeks
Time Frame: Enrollment, end of Week 12
The Severe Impairment Rating Scale (SIRS) is used to evaluate the severity of cognitive and functional impairment in individuals with severe dementia, including memory, orientation, and daily living activities. Scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating more severe impairment. Administered by masked outcome assessor in person at baseline, end of Week 12, and at 4-week follow-up after removal of treatment.
Enrollment, end of Week 12
Mean Change from Baseline in Cognition at 4-Week Follow-Up
Time Frame: Baseline, 4-week follow up (week 16; 4 weeks after removal of treatment)
The SIRS is used to evaluate the severity of cognitive and functional impairment in individuals with severe dementia, including memory, orientation, and daily living activities. Scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating more severe impairment. Administered by masked outcome assessor in person at baseline, end of Week 12, and at 4-week follow-up after removal of treatment.
Baseline, 4-week follow up (week 16; 4 weeks after removal of treatment)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change in Spontaneous Speech at Week 4
Time Frame: Immediately before and immediately after session 8 at week 4
Spontaneous speech will be administered 1 hour before and 1 hour after session 8, during week 4, by a masked outcome assessor, who will follow a script of simple social responses, picture description task [cookie theft], and animal and vegetable naming. Responses will be audio recorded for lexical feature analysis using standard and AI approaches.
Immediately before and immediately after session 8 at week 4
Mean Change in Spontaneous Speech at Week 8
Time Frame: Immediately before and immediately after session 16 at week 8
Spontaneous speech will be administered 1 hour before and 1 hour after session 16, during week 8, by a masked outcome assessor, who will follow a script of simple social responses, picture description task [cookie theft], and animal and vegetable naming. Responses will be audio recorded for lexical feature analysis using standard and AI approaches.
Immediately before and immediately after session 16 at week 8
Mean Change in Spontaneous Speech at Week 12
Time Frame: Immediately before and immediately after session 24 at week 12
Spontaneous speech will be administered 1 hour before and 1 hour after session 24, during week 12, by a masked outcome assessor, who will follow a script of simple social responses, picture description task [cookie theft], and animal and vegetable naming. Responses will be audio recorded for lexical feature analysis using standard and AI approaches.
Immediately before and immediately after session 24 at week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alaine E. Reschke-Hernandez, PhD, University Of Kentucky

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 12, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 20, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 94750
  • P30AG072946 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

This is a small pilot study. Pilot data for preliminary effect size estimating will not be publicly shared. Researchers may request de-identified data and study materials from the principal investigator.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

6 months after publication. The principal investigator will consider sharing data and study materials prior to that time frame in consultation with the study team.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The principal investigator will share data, qualitative and quantitative analysis plans, and study materials with other researchers who provide a reasonable rationale for intended use, by email. Requests will be reviewed by the principal investigator Reschke-Hernandez, all co-investigators, and all study team members.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dementia Severe

Subscribe