Pilot Study of a Robot-assisted Intervention for the Management of Care-induced Pain in Dementia (PARODOL)

November 19, 2021 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Prevention of Care-induced Pain in Elderly Persons With Cognitive Impairments and Living in EHPAD : Systematic Evaluation and Mediation With the PARO Robot.

Health care professionals lack tools to deal with acute pain in patients with moderate to severe dementia during daily nursing situations. Care-induced pain in institutionalized persons with cognitive impairments can cause anxiety and behavioral problems.The aim of this study is to demonstrate that a systematic identification of pain associated with the use of social robots such as the PARO robot may contribute to a better anticipation and management of care-induced pain. The investigators hypothesize that an individual use of the PARO robot would bring relaxation to the patient, a distraction regarding the aversive situation of care and, thus, it would prevent manifestations of acute pain in patients with dementia.

Secondary objectives of the study :

  1. determine the effect of the use of PARO during painful cares on quality of life, medication of patients, and perceived workload of the health-care team.
  2. examine socio-demographic and clinical responders' participants to the intervention, and,
  3. identify essential elements regarding cost-effectiveness of a systematic evaluation of pain and a mediation with the PARO robot in care-induced pain

Study Overview

Detailed Description

in is a frequent problem in persons with moderate to severe dementia and has been associated to different care situations. Daily observations in care homes show that pain frequently causes anxiety and behavioral symptoms, including agitation and opposition to nursing care. A key recommendation of the International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA) is the use of psychosocial approaches as first-line therapy for behavioral problems in persons with dementia. Indeed, a wide range of non-pharmacological interventions for persons with dementia exist, such as biofeedback, music therapy, therapeutic touch or relaxation. Most of these interventions have shown positive results on health status, quality of life, socialization, and functional capacity in dementia. However, to date, little is known on the effect of psychosocial interventions on care-induced pain in this population. In consequence, there is still a need for the development of innovative interventions.

At a time when modern technologies are assuming a central role in our society, investigators are currently witnessing an important evolution of the use of social robots in healthcare interventions. In this research area, numerous studies have been conducted with social robots, such as PARO®, an animal-like robot modeled on a baby harp seal. Most of them have been successful in encouraging communication and/or social behaviors and also reducing Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD), loneliness, stress' levels, agitation and the use of pain medication. However, although these results indicate a potential application of robot-assisted therapies for pain management in persons with dementia, the use of PARO during painful care-situations is still to be investigated.

The investigators propose a new combination of current health cares, namely to mediate care-induced pain with the PARO robot.

Consequently, a randomized AB/BA crossover design will be employed. Patients will be assigned randomly to either phase A during which they will benefit from a systemic pain assessment and from the PARO robot as a therapeutic mediator, followed by phase B during which patients will benefit from a systemic pain assessment without the PARO robot, or phase B followed by phase A.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bellegarde En Forez, France, 42210
        • Résidence Mutualiste " L'adret "
      • La Grand Croix, France, 43320
        • Résidence Mutualiste " Les Tilleuls "
      • Paris, France, 75013
        • Hôpital Broca
      • Saint Etienne, France, 42000
        • Résidence Mutualiste " La Cerisaie "
      • Saint-just-malmont, France, 43240
        • Résidence Mutualiste " Marie Lagrevol "

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient over 60 years of age
  • Consent to participate
  • Patient diagnosed by a geriatrician or a neurologist with moderate to severe dementia (MMSE<24), according to the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual DSM IV-TR (APA,2004) and NINCDS-ADRDA(McKhann et al.1984).
  • Patient living in a nursing home or a long stay department
  • Painful patient during nursing care (pain drugs prescription or direct observation)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient (or patient's legal representative) does not provide consent
  • The presence of acute organic disease or psychiatric decompensation and major neuropsychiatric symptoms incompatible with the intervention.
  • Patient who cannot interact physically with Paro
  • The presence of multidrug-resistant bacteria in patient to reduce the risk of contamination.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Arm AB : Intervention under study x Control intervention
Subjects receive intervention A during which they will benefit from a systemic pain assessment and from the PARO robot as a therapeutic mediator, followed by intervention B during which patients will benefit from a systemic pain assessment without the PARO robot.
Each session with the PARO robot will encompasses the same four following steps (a) Meeting Paro (b) Proposing contact (c) Individually using Paro during the care (d) End of the exposure.
A systematic evaluation of the pain
OTHER: Arm BA: Control intervention x Intervention under study
Subjects receive intervention B during which they will benefit from a systemic pain assessment without the PARO robot, followed by intervention A during which patients will benefit from a systemic pain assessment and from the PARO robot as a therapeutic mediator.
Each session with the PARO robot will encompasses the same four following steps (a) Meeting Paro (b) Proposing contact (c) Individually using Paro during the care (d) End of the exposure.
A systematic evaluation of the pain

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ALGOPLUS scale
Time Frame: 2 months

A proximal measure of pain rating on a scale of 1) facial expressions, 2) look, 3) complaints, 4) body position and, 5) atypical behaviors.

And a distal measures of pain

2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PACSLAC-F score
Time Frame: at inclusion
A distal measure of pain .
at inclusion
PACSLAC-F score
Time Frame: 4 weeks
A distal measure of pain .
4 weeks
PACSLAC-F score
Time Frame: 8 weeks
A distal measure of pain .
8 weeks
Simple verbal scale (SVS)
Time Frame: 2 months
Measurement with a scale in 3 points
2 months
The appreciation of the Paro robot
Time Frame: 2 months
Measurement with a visual scale in 5 points: from 1 (not at all) to 5 (considerably) on a visual scale.
2 months
Incidence of patient Medication
Time Frame: 2 months
Medications (analgesic, neuroleptic, anxiolytic, antidepressant, sleeping pill) taken by the patient
2 months
EQ-5D score
Time Frame: at inclusion
A questionnaire (EQ-5D) of quality life which includes five single-item dimensions assessing: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression of participants.
at inclusion
EQ-5D score
Time Frame: 4 weeks
A questionnaire (EQ-5D) of quality life which includes five single-item dimensions assessing: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression of participants.
4 weeks
EQ-5D score
Time Frame: 8 weeks
A questionnaire (EQ-5D) of quality life which includes five single-item dimensions assessing: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression of participants.
8 weeks
Appreciation of care
Time Frame: 2 months
Measurement with 2 visual scales in 4 and 5 points
2 months
Appreciation of PARO robot
Time Frame: 2 months
Measurement with a visual scale in 5 points
2 months
Duration of the care
Time Frame: 2 months
2 months
NASA-TLX score
Time Frame: 2 months
The NASA-TLX is an instrument to assess overall subjective workload with 6 dimensions of "workload" experienced by the health-care team: Mental Demand, Physical Demand and Temporal Demand, Frustration, Effort, and Performance
2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anne-Sophie RIGAUD, MD, PhD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 15, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 12, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 12, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

July 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Moderate to Severe Dementia

Clinical Trials on A : Systemic evaluation of the pain and mediation with the PARO therapeutic robot

3
Subscribe