Multi-Technology Integrated Total Mesorectal Excision Versus Conventional Total Mesorectal Excision for the Treatment of Middle and Distal Rectal Cancer.

A Randomized Controlled Study of Multi-technology Integration Total Mesorectal Excision (MTI-TME) Versus Conventional Total Mesorectal Excision (C-TME) for the Treatment of Middle and Distal Rectal Cancer.

A multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial of multi-technology integration total mesorectal excision (MTI-TME) versus conventional total mesorectal excision (C-TME) for the treatment of middle and distal rectal cancer

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Currently, laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) has become the standard procedure for treating middle and distal rectal cancer. Anastomotic leakage has always been one of the serious complications of TME surgery, and Anastomotic leakage not only increases the hospital expenses, but also brings physical discomfort and psychological pain to the patients. Furthermore, anastomotic leakage is associated with a heightened risk of anastomotic stenosis, compromised bowel function, delayed initiation of postoperative adjuvant therapy, increased local recurrence rates post-surgery, and diminished long-term survival outcomes. A report from the Netherlands indicates that anastomotic leakage serves as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in patients diagnosed with rectal cancer. Prior studies have documented the incidence of anastomotic leakage to range between 3.6% and 21%, attributable to a confluence of various factors including technical complications, oncological considerations, and the patient's overall health status. Among these determinants, aspects such as blood supply adequacy, tension at the site of anastomosis, tissue quality, and anatomical positioning of the rectum are widely recognized as significant risk factors for developing anastomotic leaks.Currently, several strategies are employed to mitigate the incidence of anastomotic leakage, including preoperative proctocolectomy, anal decompression placement, vertical transverse resection of the rectum, and anastomotic reinforcement techniques. In our clinical practice, we have innovatively integrated multiple approaches: (1) preservation of the left colic artery (LCA); (2) high-level resection of the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV); (3) standardized mobilization of the splenic flexure along with left lateral colon; (4) multi-plane dissection of mesorectal flaps; and (5) selective reinforcement at the anastomosis. Our findings indicate that multi-technology integrated total mesorectal excision (MTI-TME) significantly reduces both preventive stoma rates and incidences of anastomotic leakage compared to conventional total mesorectal excision (C-TME), . However, there remains a lack of robust evidence-based medicine supporting MTI-TME's advantages in treating middle and distal rectal cancer; further research is urgently needed to provide additional clinical evidence.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

324

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants must be aged 18 to 75.
  2. Histopathological examination of the preoperative biopsy confirms adenocarcinoma.
  3. Preoperative MRI shows the tumor's lower margin is below the umbilical ligament.
  4. High-resolution CT and MRI do not indicate suspicious distant metastasis.
  5. Participants' general condition is acceptable, with an ASA score of ≤3 before surgery.
  6. Participants must sign an informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Developing other malignant tumors within 5 years;
  2. Multiple primary colorectal tumors;
  3. Pregnant or lactating women;
  4. Patients with severe mental disorders;
  5. Severe intestinal diseases;
  6. Poor general condition and uncontrolled comorbidities;
  7. Ineligible for laparoscopic surgery;
  8. Participating in other clinical trials.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Multi-Technology Integrated Total Mesorectal Excision,MTI-TME
Multi-Technology Tntegrated Total Mesorectal Excision,MTI-TME
Placebo Comparator: Conventional Total Mesorectal Excision,C-TME
Conventional Total Mesorectal Excision,C-TME

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
anastomotic leakage rate
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operation time
Time Frame: During surgery
During surgery
intraoperative blood loss
Time Frame: During surgery
During surgery
3-year overall suvival rate
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
local recurrance rate
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
3-year disease-free survival rate
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
3-year mortality rate
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
postoperative quality of life
Time Frame: 3 years
Postoperative quality of life will be evaluated by EORTC QLQ C30 Questionnaire
3 years
intestinal exhaust time
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
postoperative pain
Time Frame: 1 year
Postoperative pain will be assessed by numerical rating scale (NES).
1 year
colostomy rate
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
hospital stay
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
hospital cost
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer

Clinical Trials on MTI-TME

Subscribe