Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer. (taTME)

August 7, 2018 updated by: vignali andrea, IRCCS San Raffaele

Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision For Mid And Low Rectal Cancer. A Multicentre Randomised Clinical Trial on Anastomotic Leak

This study is designed as a prospective, multi-center, randomized, open-labelled, parallel group, non-inferiority trial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the TaTME technique compared with conventional laparoscopic rectal surgery, focusing on, anastomotic dehiscence, conversion rate to open surgery, hospital stay and long-term functional outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study is designed as a prospective, multi-center, randomized, open-labelled, parallel group, non-inferiority trial. The patients will be randomized and assigned to transanal mesorectal excision (TaTME) or laparoscopic mesorectal excision (LpTME) at a ratio 1:1, based on a centralized computer generated, blocked randomization list stratified by center. Six centers will be involved. Within each center a block size of four will be used, stratified by gender and age (±3 years). A central electronic data capture system will be generated by the promoting center for data collection. All the participating surgeons and centers will be required to document their previous experience with TaTME (a minimum of 10 documented procedures is required). Moreover, they will be invited to submit a video showing their surgical technique in performing a TaTME operation (said video must contain no reference to patient ID, and is used exclusively to demonstrate the participating surgeon's technique). The video will be reviewed by the promoting center in order to standardize the procedure, prior to the beginning of the recruitment process. In each center, before starting effective recruitment of patients to the trial, the surgical team will be required to perform a minimum of 4 TaTME operations based on the adopted standardized procedure to calibrate the participant surgeons.

All statistical analyses will be conducted on an "intention to treat" basis.

Statistical methodology The trial is designed as a non-inferiority trial. In statistical terms, the study will establish whether the anastomotic rate (%) for the experimental treatment is not worse than the anastomotic rate (%) for the standard treatment by more than a specific non-inferiority margin, δ, set to 0.05, with δ denoting the difference anastomotic rate rates (experimental vs. control). Formally, the study will test the one-sided null hypothesis H0: δ > = 5% vs. the alternative H1: δ < 5%, and will reject the null hypothesis with a 5% level of significance if the upper bound of a standard asymptotic 90% confidence interval for difference in proportions is below the 5% non-inferiority margin.

Sample size In recent studies (1-5) estimating the anastomotic leak ("failure") rate (%) in the standard LpTME (control technique) ranged from 6.4 to 18.8 % (median of studies, 13%), while in the two recent studies evaluating TaTME (experimental technique) it was 6.7% and 8.6 %, respectively, (resulting in a weighted rate of 7%). The investigators therefore hypothesised a failure rate of 13% (that equivalently means a "success" rate of 87%) in the control arm and a crude (relative) 6% (4.6%) reduction in the experimental arm (that equivalently means a "success" rate of 93%) over the standard arm. Based on the non-inferiority hypothesis and the above findings, and assuming a non-inferiority limit of 0.05, a total of 184 patients (92 for each arm) is required i.e., if there is a true difference in favour of the experimental treatment of 6%, then 184 patients are required to be 80% sure that the upper limit of a one-sided 95% confidence interval (or equivalently a 90% two-sided confidence interval) will exclude a difference in favour of the standard group of more than 5%. The inclusion period will be of 2 years. The results will be available within 3 years of starting recruitment. The investigators will consider still acceptable and not different clinically a failure rate of 18% (i.e., a non-inferiority limit of 5%) as this value is below the 18.8% maximum failure rate estimated in the standard LpTME. Additionally, the non-inferiority limit of 5% has been also recently indicated in a similar trial (ETAP-GRECCAR 11 TRIAL) (assuming conversion to open as "failure" event) registered at clinicalTrials.gov, NCT02584985.

Statistical analysis Both per-protocol and intention-to-treat analysis will be performed, as currently recommended in literature. Descriptive data for continuous variables will be reported as mean (standard deviation [SD]) or median (25th and 75th percentiles), as appropriate. Descriptive data for categorical variables will be reported as number of observations (percentage). For continuous variables, univariate comparison between LpTME and TaTME will be performed by the Student's t test for normally distributed data (based on the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) or the Mann-Whitney U test for non-normally distributed data. The chi-square test, or the Fisher exact test, as well the Kruskal-Wallis test, as appropriate, will be used for comparing discrete variables. Logistic regression models will be additionally carried out and survival analysis of postoperative binary outcomes, as appropriate. All the statistical tests will be performed by using the SPSS statistical package, version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) for Windows (Microsoft, Redmond, WA).

Study procedure:

Study procedures will consist in 2-team (combined) low anterior resection with transanal TME using laparoscopic abdominal assistance. Laparoscopic abdominal access will be obtained followed by inferior mesenteric vessels transection, mobilization of the proximal colon and splenic flexure takedown will be performed in all cases. Transanal TME is performed either at the same time or following the above steps. Following pursestring closure of the rectum below the tumor, transanal endoscopic TME dissection will proceed circumferentially until the peritoneal cavity is entered anteriorly. Following complete mobilization of the rectosigmoid, the specimen will be extracted transanally or using a Pfannenstiel incision followed by colorectal anastomosis, and a temporary diverting stoma will be created, which is standard of care following surgery for this type of cancer. At the end of the surgical procedure a macroscopical examination of the specimen will be conducted by the surgeon in conjunction with the pathologist.

Postoperative care and follow-up:

All patients enrolled in the study will be managed according to same standard postoperative protocols. Postoperative visits and oncology follow-up visits will occur as per standard practice and oncologic outcomes. The duration of postoperative follow up for each patient will be 3 years.

DATA OWNERSHIP AND PUBLICATION

The single participating centers will gather the data which will then be analyzed centrally by the promoting center. The promoting center will aim to publish said data in an adequate scientific journal and share the results with the principal investigators (PIs) of all participating centers.

ADVERSE EVENTS

All adverse events will be notified to the promoting centre by Case Report File (CRF). The promoting center will then gather the data and promptly notify the PIs and Ethic Committees of all participating centers.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

184

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • histologically proven solitary mid and low rectal cancer
  • proven by rigid rectoscopy, pelvic MRI and digital rectal examination (DRE)
  • amenable to curative sphincter-preserving surgery
  • no evidence of distant metastases (T3-4a,N0 or T1-4a,N1-2)
  • if evaluated after neoadiuvant therapy, no evidence of threaten of the mesorectal fascia (MRF) after therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no indication to perform sphincter preservation surgery (Tumors invading into the internal anal sphincter muscle based on pelvic MRI)
  • T4b tumor invading adjacent organs
  • recurrent cancer
  • concurrent or previous diagnosis of invasive cancer within 5 years
  • prior history of colorectal resection
  • tumors with in growth more than 1/3 of anal sphincter complex or levator ani.
  • presence of fecal incontinence at baseline according to Wexner's classification
  • emergent surgery with intestinal obstruction or perforation
  • absolute contraindications to general anaesthesia or prolonged pneumoperitoneum, such as severe cardiovascular or respiratory disease (ASA class > III)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: transanal TME
Study procedure will consist in 2-team (combined) LAR with transanal TME using laparoscopic abdominal assistance.Transanal TME is performed either at the same time or following the above steps. Transanal endoscopic TME dissection will proceed circumferentially until the peritoneal cavity is entered anteriorly. Following complete mobilization of the rectosigmoid, the specimen is extracted transanally or using a Pfannenstiel incision followed by colorectal anastomosis, and a temporary diverting stoma will be created, which is standard of care following surgery for this type of cancer.
Procedure: transanal TME
transanal approach to TME in rectal cancer
Active Comparator: laparoscopic TME
Procedure will consist in 1 team performing laparoscopic TME. Following stapled closure of the rectum below the tumor, and complete mobilization of the rectosigmoid, the specimen is extracted using a Pfannenstiel incision . A stapled (knight-Griffen) colorectal anastomosis or coloanal anastomosis will be created and a temporary diverting stoma will be fashioned which is standard of care following surgery for this type of cancer.
Procedure: laparoscopic TME
laparoscopic approach to TME in rectal cancer

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anastomotic leakage
Time Frame: 30 days
Evaluate the effectiveness of the T-TME versus L-LAR in term of clinically evident anastomotic leak rate.
30 days
Conversion to open
Time Frame: intraoperative
Evaluate the effectiveness of the T-TME versus L-LAR in term of conversion to open surgery
intraoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pathology
Time Frame: 30 days
Complete pathology assessment of TME specimens according to Quirke classification
30 days
QoL
Time Frame: 12 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of the T-TME versus L-LAR on quality of life assessed with Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) score in patients with rectal cancer. The questionnaire consists of eight sections, each of which is evaluated 0 (most disability) to 100 (least disability).
12 months
Functional results
Time Frame: 12 months
Evaluating functional results after ileostomy closure. The evaluation will be done using the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire (FIQL). Scales range from 1 to 4; with a 1 indicating a lower functional status of quality of life. Scales scores are the average (mean) response to all items in the scale.
12 months
Functional results 2
Time Frame: 12 months
Evaluating functional results after ileostomy closure.The evaluation will be done using Wexner scores (range 0-20 i.e. least-most incontinence) in patients with rectal cancer.
12 months
postoperative complications
Time Frame: 30 days
evaluating postoperative complications after surgery according to Clavien-Dindo Classification
30 days
Long-term postoperative complications
Time Frame: 36 months
evaluating long-term postoperative complications following hospital discharge
36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

IRCCS San Raffaele

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrea Vignali, IRCCS San Raffaele

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 27, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 29, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 28, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

January 29, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • taTME

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer

Clinical Trials on transanal TME

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Montenegro

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe