Assessing the Usability and Reliability of the Prototype Prosthesis Devices (MOTU++)

March 26, 2026 updated by: Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus

MOTU++ - Studio Clinico Protesi

The aim of the present study is to verify the functionalitỳ, the degree of safety and the reliability of devices composed of an intelligent socket that allows the detection of biosignals and provides vibrotactile feedback and a prosthesis with active knee and ankle joints and a sensorised foot, for people with trans-femoral or trans-tibial amputation, which allows the optimisation of the gait cycle by providing active assistance at the knee and ankle joints according to the specific movement made by the user. The prototype devices are innovative in that they make it possible to optimise the benefits generated by the presence of actuated joints by exploiting the biosignals detected to ensure optimal functionalitỳ in the performance of activities̀ of daily living.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • FI
      • Florence, FI, Italy, 50143
        • IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 and 80 years;
  • Lower limb amputation at the transfemoral or transtibial level;
  • Functional medical classification: Level K3-K4 [25];
  • Subjects wearing a prosthesis for at least 1 year (experienced wearers);
  • Maximum body weight 100 kg.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant medical comorbidities: Presence of severe neurological disorders, cardiovascular diseases, uncontrolled diabetes/hypertension, or severe sensory deficits.
  • Implanted cardiac devices: Individuals with implanted pacemakers or cardioverter-defibrillators.
  • Cognitive impairment: Individuals with a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score less than 24, adjusted for age and education, indicating cognitive impairment that may compromise understanding of instructions and research participation.
  • Severe depressive symptoms: Individuals with a Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) score less than 19, indicating clinically significant depression that may affect motivation and participation in the research.
  • Severe anxiety symptoms: Individuals with a State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Y) score less than 50, indicating clinically significant anxiety that may interfere with research participation.
  • Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent: Individuals who are unable to understand or provide informed consent to participate in the research, or who refuse to participate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: prosthetic group performs the entire protocol with the prosthesis prototype.

These 3 sessions will commence only upon successful completion of the prosthesis safety and reliability tests conducted in the preceding sessions.

For each module combination, a session will be conducted to assess motor performance through the acquisition of spatiotemporal parameters and energy efficiency parameters of gait. Motor performance will be evaluated using functional assessment tests and data will be recorded during the following activities:

  • parallel bar walking on flat ground
  • parallel bar walking on an inclined surface
  • treadmill walking with a safety harness
  • stair climbing/descending with a handrail
  • standing up and sitting down from a chair within parallel bars At the end of each session, satisfaction questionnaires (ad hoc questionnaire) will be completed. At the end of the experiment, a usability scale for the devices (ad hoc System Usability Scale) will be completed.

Each session is expected to last approximately 2.5 hours.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ad hoc check list for Adverse Event
Time Frame: baseline
questionnaire that evaluate the device feasibility of the prosthesis and description of any adverse events.
baseline
Ad hoc check list for Adverse Event
Time Frame: day 1
questionnaire that evaluate the device feasibility of the prosthesis and description of any adverse events.
day 1
Ad hoc check list for Adverse Event
Time Frame: day 2
questionnaire that evaluate the device feasibility of the prosthesis and description of any adverse events.
day 2
Ad hoc check list for Adverse Event
Time Frame: day 3
questionnaire that evaluate the device feasibility of the prosthesis and description of any adverse events.
day 3
Ad hoc check list for Adverse Event
Time Frame: day 4
questionnaire that evaluate the device feasibility of the prosthesis and description of any adverse events.
day 4
Ad hoc check list for Adverse Event
Time Frame: day 5
questionnaire that evaluate the device feasibility of the prosthesis and description of any adverse events.
day 5
Ad hoc check list for Adverse Event
Time Frame: day 6
questionnaire that evaluate the device feasibility of the prosthesis and description of any adverse events.
day 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Borg Scale
Time Frame: day 1
0-10 numerical rating scale that evaluate of the subjective perception of efforts during walking.
day 1
Borg Scale
Time Frame: day 2
0-10 numerical rating scale that evaluate of the subjective perception of efforts during walking.
day 2
Borg Scale
Time Frame: day 3
0-10 numerical rating scale that evaluate of the subjective perception of efforts during walking.
day 3
Borg Scale
Time Frame: day 4
0-10 numerical rating scale that evaluate of the subjective perception of efforts during walking.
day 4
Borg Scale
Time Frame: day 5
0-10 numerical rating scale that evaluate of the subjective perception of efforts during walking.
day 5
10mwt - 10 meters walking test
Time Frame: baseline
to evaluate walking capacity measured in seconds
baseline
10mwt - 10 meters walking test
Time Frame: day 4
to evaluate walking capacity measured in seconds
day 4
6mwt - 6 minutes walking test
Time Frame: baseline
to evaluate walking capacity measured in metres
baseline
System Usability Scale
Time Frame: day 6.
a questionnaire made up of 10 questions whose answers are yes structured on a Likert scale with 0-100 that assesses the usability of the prosthesis.
day 6.
TUG - Time Up and Go
Time Frame: baseline
to assess lower limb capabilities in seconds
baseline
TUG - Time Up and Go
Time Frame: day 4
to assess lower limb capabilities in seconds
day 4
SCT - Stair Climbing Test
Time Frame: baseline
to assess the capabilities of climb 8 stairs in seconds
baseline
SCT - Stair Climbing Test
Time Frame: day 4
to assess the capabilities of climb 8 stairs in seconds
day 4
6mwt - 6 minutes walking test
Time Frame: day 6
to evaluate walking capacity measured in metres
day 6
FCT - Functional Reach Test
Time Frame: baseline
to assess the balance in centimeters
baseline
Functional Reach Test
Time Frame: day 5
to assess the balance in centimeters
day 5
Cost of Transport -COT
Time Frame: day 6
To assess metabolic consumption
day 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 27, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2026

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CP-PAI-02-23

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Amputation

Clinical Trials on prototype prosthetic group

Subscribe