Functional Importance of a Powered Multifunction Wrist Protocol

Determining the Functional Importance of a Powered Multifunction Wrist

The focus of this study is to conduct a clinical study in individuals with transradial amputations to compare function using a 1-DOF or 2-DOF wrist. All prostheses will be attached to a single DOF Otto Bock hand and controlled using a pattern recognition system equivalent to the Coapt system. This study will enable the investigator to quantify the relative functional value of powered wrist flexion during both in-laboratory testing and home use. In addition, the investigators will address the effectiveness of different hand-wrist combinations to enhance patient-centered clinical decision making.

Study Overview

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Conditions: Amputation; Amputation; Traumatic, Limb; Upper Limb Amputation at the Hand; Upper Limb Amputation at the Wrist
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: Commercially available device; Device: Non FDA registered device

Detailed Description

The primary objective of this project is to evaluate the functional importance of a multi function wrist compared to a single degree of freedom wrist. This will be accomplished through in laboratory testing and an 8-week home trial. The first aim will involve in-laboratory functional performance testing with a 1-DOF or a 2-DOF wrist and a one degree of freedom hand.

Changes in performance will be assessed with multiple outcome measures that include both quantitative and qualitative testing of prosthesis control and functional performance. The second aim will determine how a 2-DOF wrist impacts control and home use of a one degree of freedom hand. Subjects will compete an 8 week home based trial. Participants will be instructed to complete a written home log of activities and electronic logging usage data will also be collected for each experimental condition. The investigators hypothesize that adding a wrist flexion/extension module to a wrist rotation module and a single-DOF terminal device will provide significant improvements in function for transradial amputees.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Estimated): 14
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

• Study Contact: Name: Suzanne Finucane; Phone Number: 3122380937; Email: sfinucane@sralab.org

Study Locations

• United States
  • Illinois
    • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
      • Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 95 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Ages 18-95
• A unilateral upper limb amputation or absence below the elbow
• English speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

• Significant new injury that would prevent use of a prosthesis: The ability to consistently wear a prosthesis and perform activities of daily living and specific performance tasks is necessary to evaluate the relative benefits of the interventions.
• Cognitive impairment sufficient to adversely affect understanding of or compliance with study requirements, ability to communicate experiences, or ability to give informed consent: The ability to understand and comply with requirements of the study is essential in order for the study to generate useable, reliable data. The ability to obtain relevant user feedback through questionnaires and informal discussion adds significant value to this study.
• Significant other comorbidity: Any other medical issues or injuries that would preclude completion of the study, use of the prostheses, or that would otherwise prevent acquisition of useable data by researchers

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Basic Science
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Home Trial Condition A; Subject will use a pattern recognition controlled prosthesis that includes a powered wrist rotation, passive wrist flexion/extension, and a single DOF powered hand.	Device: Commercially available device; A commercially available and registered with the FDA prosthesis equipped with a powered single-degree of freedom wrist and powered hand.
Experimental: Home Trial Condition B; Subject will use at pattern recognition controlled prosthesis that includes a powered wrist rotation, powered flexion/extension and a single DOF powered hand.	Device: Non FDA registered device; An experimental, non FDA registered prosthesis equipped with a multi function wrist and a powered hand.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Academy of Prosthetics and Orthotics ULPOM committee toolkit of outcome measures to record change of prosthetic performance	Measuring the function of upper limb prostheses is challenging and requires multiple test formats. A toolkit of functional outcome tests recommend by the Academy of Prosthetics and Orthotics ULPOM committee will be used to measure functional effectiveness of prosthetic treatment will be used as the primary outcome measure. The outcome measures to evaluate prosthesis use includes both quantitative and qualitative testing of prosthesis control and functional performance.	Baseline and 8 weeks for Condition A; Baseline and 8 weeks for Condition B

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
SHAP: Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure; a clinically validated hand function test to assess the effectiveness of upper limb prostheses.	An objective test of unilateral hand function that can be used to evaluate functionality of passive, mechanical, or myoelectric hands without bias to type [31]. Movement of abstract objects (classified into six prehension patterns) and activities of daily living are timed by the subject. Scores are compared to a normalized, able-bodied control score of 100.	Baseline and 8 weeks for Condition A; Baseline and 8 weeks for Condition B
Modified Box and Blocks Test of Manual Dexterity	A timed test that evaluates gross manual dexterity. Small (1-inch) blocks are moved one at a time from one side of a box to the other over a wooden partition. The final score is the number of blocks transferred in 1 minute, typically averaged over three trials. For this test, only opening and closing of the terminal device is required, although subjects with transradial amputations do typically use compensatory movements. It is possible that a 2-DOF wrist may move inadvertently and impair performance on this task. As a result, we would view either an improvement or no change in this score to be a positive finding.	Baseline and 8 weeks for Condition A; Baseline and 8 weeks for Condition B
Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test	A standardized test of manual dexterity that evaluates hand function during performance of seven hand-related tasks using common items such as cards, cans, paper clips, and coins [32]. Subjects are evaluated by the time required to complete each task	Baseline and 8 weeks for Condition A; Baseline and 8 weeks for Condition B
Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control (ACMC)	An observational assessment tool that measures the subject's ability to control a myoelectric hand. The ability to control gripping, holding, releasing, and coordinating 30 items is scored on a 4-point capability scale. The prosthetic hand is used in an active assist or passive support role. Rasch analysis is used to convert capability ratings to a single measure of each subject's functional ability. Both Ms Turner and Dr. Miller are trained to complete this assessment.	Baseline and 8 weeks for Condition A; Baseline and 8 weeks for Condition B
Orthotics and Prosthetics User Survey - Upper Extremity Function Status	A 19- item, self-reported measure of an individual's ability to perform self-care and upper limb-based daily living tasks (e.g. button shirt, tie shoelaces) using a 5-point scale [35]. Rasch analysis of the questionnaire ratings is used to calculate an overall measure of each subject's functional ability.	Baseline and 8 weeks for Condition A; Baseline and 8 weeks for Condition B
Patient Specific Functional Scale	A questionnaire that asks patients to list up to five tasks they have difficulty with and rate the difficulty on an 11-point numerical scale [36]. Difficulty ratings can be averaged for each participant.	Baseline and 8 weeks for Condition A; Baseline and 8 weeks for Condition B
Clothespin Relocation Test	A test of prosthetic function that requires the user to move three clothespins from a vertical bar to a horizontal bar (thereby requiring use of the elbow, terminal device, and wrist rotator). This test has been in use by CBM as a measure of prosthesis function for over a decade.	Baseline and 8 weeks for Condition A; Baseline and 8 weeks for Condition B
Virtual Testing: Target Achievement Control Test	For the TAC Test, participants must move the virtual hand into a target posture and hold it there for a preset period of time. The TAC Test can require movement of from one to all available degrees of freedom (e.g. hand grasp plus wrist motion). Results are measured in terms of classification accuracy, completion rate, completion time, and path efficiency. This test will be used to ensure that subjects have satisfactory PR control over all DOFs prior to starting their home trial.	2 days

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
• Collaborators: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Levi Hargrove, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): January 18, 2018
• Primary Completion (Estimated): September 1, 2024
• Study Completion (Estimated): September 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: August 9, 2019
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 23, 2019
• First Posted (Actual): August 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimated): December 7, 2023
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: December 6, 2023
• Last Verified: December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Transradial Amputee
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Wounds and Injuries; Amputation, Traumatic
• Other Study ID Numbers: STU00206531; 5R01HD094861-02 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No