International Severe CRSwNP Registry 2024-2028 (INVENT)

April 6, 2025 updated by: Vibeke Backer

InternatioNal seVerE CRSwNP Registry (INVENT) 2024-2028

The objective of the study is to collect real-life data worldwide, which already have been collected in national databases, to merge the data and the knowledge with the focus of better care for the individual patients, more efficient use of the hospital cost of biologics and working for "personalized medicine".

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Regional or national registries have evaluated the efficacy of different biologics in severe uncontrolled CRSwNP coordinated by several academic centres in Europe. At present, these registries have not been merged nor allowed the comparison in real-life efficacy between the 3 different monoclonal antibodies (mepolizumab, dupilumab, omalizumab) with different mechanism which has been approved for the indication of CRSwNP and the effect of the nasal polyp score. Some countries have allowance for some of the different biologic drugs, other countries have other combination of the drugs. Despite the heterogeneity in availability of biologics for the indication of CRSwNP, the merge of data might lead to very interesting outcomes.

The objective of the study is to collect real-life data worldwide, which already have been collected in national databases, to merge the data and the knowledge with the focus of better care for the individual patients, more efficient use of the hospital cost of biologics and working for "personalized medicine".

Compare the outcomes of different biologics in different national registries, at screening and 6-month follow-up: Primary aims:

  1. Delphi process to point at the viable of importance.
  2. The speed and size of SNOT-22 reduction
  3. The speed and size of NPS reduction
  4. The speed and size of Nasal congestion score (NCS) reduction
  5. The speed and size of smell score increase.
  6. The CTscan/Lund-Mackay score response
  7. The evolution of the response on VAS scale (patients)
  8. The Type 2 biomarkers at entrance and during the study
  9. The (non)responder percentages defined based on EUFOREA criteria
  10. The use of OCS (amount and frequency)
  11. The frequency and time (days) since last sinus surgery
  12. The effect of biologics on comorbidities (atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, asthma and NSAID intolerance) in patients with CRSwNP
  13. The reduced in need of Otrivin or similar drugs
  14. Differences between inclusion criteria for biologic drugs, and differences between countries.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

3000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark, DK-2100
        • Department of Rhinolaryngology Head & Neck surgery and Audiology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

In Denmark, the study population consists of patients suffering CRSwNP and treated with biologic treatments included in global airways Danish/National registry.

In the other countries, the study population consists of patients suffering CRSwNP and treated with biologic treatments who are included in local Registries.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Symptoms of CRSwNP
  • Indication for biologic treatment as suggested by EPOS/EUFOREA
  • Have been followed for 6 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unilateral polyps
  • Non-Type-2 inflammation
  • Treatment less than 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients from Danish registry of global airways
Patients included in the Danish Global Airways Registry
Biologic drugs including Mepolizumab, Dupilumab, Omalizumab, Tezepelumab, or future monoclonal antibodies
Patients from the Belgian registry of global airways
Patients included in the Belgian Global Airways Registry
Biologic drugs including Mepolizumab, Dupilumab, Omalizumab, Tezepelumab, or future monoclonal antibodies
Patients from the Netherlands registry of global airways
Patients included in the Netherlands registry of global airways
Biologic drugs including Mepolizumab, Dupilumab, Omalizumab, Tezepelumab, or future monoclonal antibodies
Patients from the German registry of global airways
Patients included in the German registry of global airways
Biologic drugs including Mepolizumab, Dupilumab, Omalizumab, Tezepelumab, or future monoclonal antibodies
Patients from the Swiss registry of global airways
Patients included in the Swiss registry of global airways
Biologic drugs including Mepolizumab, Dupilumab, Omalizumab, Tezepelumab, or future monoclonal antibodies
Patients from the Italian registry of global airways
Patients included in the Italian registry of global airways
Biologic drugs including Mepolizumab, Dupilumab, Omalizumab, Tezepelumab, or future monoclonal antibodies
Patients from the Portuguese registry of global airways
Patients included in the Portuguese registry of global airways
Biologic drugs including Mepolizumab, Dupilumab, Omalizumab, Tezepelumab, or future monoclonal antibodies
Patients from the Finnish registry of global airways
Patients included in the Finnish registry of global airways
Biologic drugs including Mepolizumab, Dupilumab, Omalizumab, Tezepelumab, or future monoclonal antibodies
Patients from the US registry of global airways
Patients included in the US registry of global airways
Biologic drugs including Mepolizumab, Dupilumab, Omalizumab, Tezepelumab, or future monoclonal antibodies
Patients from the Australian registry of global airways
Patients included in the Australian registry of global airways
Biologic drugs including Mepolizumab, Dupilumab, Omalizumab, Tezepelumab, or future monoclonal antibodies
Patients from Spanish registry of global airways
Patients included in the Spanish Global Airways Registry
Biologic drugs including Mepolizumab, Dupilumab, Omalizumab, Tezepelumab, or future monoclonal antibodies
Patients from Polish registry of global airways
Patients included in the Polish Global Airways Registry
Biologic drugs including Mepolizumab, Dupilumab, Omalizumab, Tezepelumab, or future monoclonal antibodies
Patients from French registry of global airways
Patients included in the French Global Airways Registry
Biologic drugs including Mepolizumab, Dupilumab, Omalizumab, Tezepelumab, or future monoclonal antibodies

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in The Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOTT22) score
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, and 60 months follow up
The success rate indicated by a significant change in health-related quality of life related to nasal symptoms measured with the questionnaire SNOT22.
6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, and 60 months follow up
Change in Nasal Polyp Score (NPS)
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, and 60 months follow up
The NPS scale ranges from 0 (no polyp) to 4 (large polyps) for each nostril. The total score ranging from 0-8.
6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, and 60 months follow up
Change in visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, and 60 months follow up
Change in VAS related to nasal symptoms. Minimum score = 0 and maximum score = 10. High score indicates worse nasal symptoms
6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, and 60 months follow up
Change in olfactory function
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, and 60 months follow up
Change in olfactory function measured with Sniffin' Stick 16 blue. Minimum score = 0. Maximum score = 16. A score between 0-8 indicates anosmia, a score between 8-11 indicates hyposmia, and a score >11 indicates normosmia.
6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, and 60 months follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 31, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2032

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 27, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP)

Clinical Trials on Biologic drugs

Subscribe