Performance of Biologic Mesh Materials in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

March 11, 2021 updated by: Dr. Chad G. Ball, University of Calgary

Performance of Biologic Mesh Materials in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction - A Randomized Controlled Trial

To date, there have been no prospective randomized controlled trials that compare various biologic mesh materials in the context of abdominal wall reconstruction. As a result, this proposal describes a 'head to head' randomized controlled trial (RCT) between 2 of the market's most popular biologic meshes. Strattice (noncross-linked porcine dermis, LifeCell Inc.) will be compared to Permacol (cross-linked porcine dermis, Covidien Inc.) in a randomized manner. Although there are significant differences between these mesh products with regard to procurement, tissue processing and cost, clinical controlled trials are needed to compare their performance.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Complex abdominal wall reconstructions utilize advanced techniques that include, but are not limited to, component separation, modified component separation, and free tissue flap reconstruction. Data suggests that recurrence rates are lowered with the insertion of mesh supporting materials. More specifically, synthetic mesh utilization during repair of simple clean ventral hernias reduces hernia recurrence by over 50% when compared to suture closure alone. Unfortunately in the presence of microbial contamination or infection, there is a marked increase in hernia recurrence and mesh infection using synthetic prostheses. Biologic meshes however are established options for use in abdominal wall reconstruction in the presence of both field contamination and infection. These indications, as well as others, for biologic materials include, but are not limited to, patients with chronic immunosuppression, infected fields, colonized fields (i.e. preceding synthetic mesh), the need to place the product within the peritoneal cavity (underlay), and patients with complex losses of domain. It should also be noted that there may be significant utility in their use of biologic materials in a much broader range of indications, but the economic cost of these products have clearly tempored wider indications for overall use.

To date, there have been no prospective randomized controlled trials that compare various biologic mesh materials in the context of abdominal wall reconstruction. As a result, this proposal describes a 'head to head' randomized controlled trial (RCT) between 2 of the market's most popular biologic meshes. Strattice (noncross-linked porcine dermis, LifeCell Inc.) will be compared to Permacol (cross-linked porcine dermis, Covidien Inc.) in a randomized manner. Although there are significant differences between these mesh products with regard to procurement, tissue processing and cost, clinical controlled trials are needed to compare their performance.

Given the nearly 2-fold difference in cost between the 2 included biologic meshes, equivalence with regard to recurrence and postoperative complications would represent a massive economic savings to the public health care system.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

90

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N2T9
        • Recruiting
        • Foothills Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Chad G Ball, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jimmy Xiao, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The study population will consist of adult patients, 18 years or older, undergoing an abdominal wall reconstruction. Prior to selection, at least 2 surgeons involved in the trial must agree that the indication for use of biologic implant is mutual.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients will be excluded if they are unable or unwilling to provide informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Strattice biologic mesh
Strattice mesh is made of noncross-linked porcine dermis, which is used to support abdominal wall reconstruction.
Patients randomized to this group will be inserted one or more Strattice biologic meshes during the abdominal wall reconstruction surgical procedure.
Experimental: Permacol biologic mesh
Permacol mesh is made of cross-linked porcine dermis, which is used to support abdominal wall reconstruction.
Patients randomized to this group will be inserted one or more Permacol biologic meshes during the abdominal wall reconstruction surgical procedure.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The percentage of hernia recurrence in patients received the biologic meshes.
Time Frame: 12 months postoperation
12 months postoperation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The percentage of wound infection of the participants.
Time Frame: 12 months postoperation
12 months postoperation
The days of hospital stay post the abdominal wall reconstruction procedure.
Time Frame: 12 months postoperation
12 months postoperation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 26, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

March 9, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Bio_ Mesh

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ventral Hernia

Clinical Trials on Strattice biologic mesh

3
Subscribe