Effectiveness of Central Oncology Navigation and the Use of an ORN

January 26, 2026 updated by: UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Navigation and Research: Evaluating the Intervention of Central Navigation and an Oncology Research Navigator (ORN) on Cancer Outcomes and Clinical Trial Enrollment (NAVIGATE Trial)

This health services interventional study investigates the effectiveness of central oncology navigation (SOC ) alone and central oncology navigation with a new role called an "oncology research navigator (ORN)" who is embedded in central oncology navigation cancer care delivery. This study will examine two patient cohorts: Cohort 1 will enroll patients with new cancer appointments within genitourinary (GU) or thoracic cancers. These clinics have not yet implemented the central navigation program. Participants will be enrolled pre- and post-implementation of the central oncology navigator within these cancer groups to evaluate the effectiveness of the central oncology navigator alone. The second cohort will enroll participants with new cancer appointments within gastrointestinal (GI), hematology, and breast cancer (clinics where the central navigation program was implemented). These individuals will be randomized to receive standard of care, which for these cancer types includes central oncology navigation or the intervention of an oncology research navigator in addition to SOC. This intervention will involve baseline and biweekly follow-up for a total of 3 months. Interactions with the ORN will include facilitating participation in supportive care services and clinical trials. All participants will undergo baseline and follow-up patient-reported outcomes and data collection. The study will evaluate the impact of the central oncology navigation program alone, as well as the addition of the ORN on patient quality of life, as well as enrollment into studies and participation in supportive care services. Additional analyses will evaluate the impact of the central oncology navigation program on patient experience, patient activation, net promoter scores, and overall survival.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

686

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
        • Recruiting
        • UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • William Wood, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

In order to participate in this study a subject must meet all of the eligibility criteria outlined below.

  • Informed consent obtained to participate in the study and HIPAA authorization for release of personal health information.
  • Subject is willing and able to comply with study activities based on the judgement of the investigator.
  • Age ≥ 18 years at the time of consent.
  • Subject has a new patient appointment for cancer care at a UNC Medical Center and a confirmed cancer diagnosis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of internet access.
  • Inability to understand the English language.
  • Psychological or other disability resulting in the inability to provide informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cohort 1
Cohort 1 will enroll patients with new cancer appointments within genitourinary (GU) or thoracic cancers. These clinics have not yet implemented the central navigation program.
Central oncology navigation (SOC ) alone.
Experimental: Cohort 2
Cohort 2 will enroll participants with new cancer appointments within gastrointestinal (GI), hematology, and breast cancer (clinics where the central navigation program was implemented). These individuals will be randomized to receive standard of care, which for these cancer types includes central oncology navigation or the intervention of oncology research navigator in addition to SOC.
The intervention of oncology research navigator or Oncology research navigator (ORN) is embedded in central oncology navigation cancer care delivery.
Other Names:
  • oncology research navigator (ORN

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cohort 1-supportive service offered
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Participation in at least 1 supportive service offered will be measured by the number of patients receiving services. This information will be gathered from chart review.
Up to 6 months
Cohort 2: number of patients enrolled
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Enrollment into non-treatment clinical studies will be measured by the number of patients enrolled at any time. This information will be gathered from chart review.
Up to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cohort 1: Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months
Cohort 1: Health-related quality of life will be measured using the PROMIS Global Health. The PROMIS Global Health is a comprehensive tool designed to assess an individual's overall physical, mental, and social health and includes 10 items that cover various health domains. These items are divided into two main components: Global Physical Health and Global Mental Health. Global Physical Health: This includes items related to physical functioning, pain, fatigue, and overall physical health. Global Mental Health: This includes items related to mental health, emotional distress, and social health.Response Options: Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating better health.Raw Scores: The responses are summed to create raw scores for both the Global Physical Health and Global Mental Health components.
Baseline and 3 months
Cohort 1: Patient activation
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months
Cohort 1: Patient activation will be measured using Patient Activation Measure -13 (PAM-13). PAM-13 is a validated questionnaire designed to assess an individual's knowledge, skills, and confidence in managing their own health and healthcare. It consists of 13 items that measure patient activation, which is the extent to which individuals feel capable of managing their health. The PAM 13 includes 13 statements that respondents rate based on their level of agreement, ranging from "Strongly Disagree" to "Strongly Agree." Responses are scored on a scale from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater patient activation.
Baseline and 3 months
Cohort 1: Patient experience
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months
Cohort 1: Patient experience will be measured using the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPs) cancer care survey. Scoring will be any number from 0 to 10, where 0 is the worst cancer care team possible and 10 is the best cancer care team possible, what number would you use to rate your cancer care team? (0-10 rating, from "worst cancer care team possible" to "best cancer care team possible" 2. Considering all your cancer care at this cancer center, using any number from 0 to 10, where 0 is the worst overall cancer care experience possible and 10 is the best overall cancer care experience possible, what number would you use to rate your overall cancer care experience? (0-10 rating, from "worst overall cancer care experience possible" to "best overall cancer care experience possible")
Baseline and 3 months
Cohort 1: Net promoter
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months

Cohort 1: Net promoter scores will be measured using the net promoter score survey.

The Net Promoter Score (NPS) is used as a metric for assessing customer loyalty and satisfaction. NPS measures the likelihood of customers to recommend a company's product or service to others. It is based on a single question: "On a scale from 0 to 10, how likely are you to recommend our product/service to a friend or colleague?"

Baseline and 3 months
Cohort 1: Overall Survival
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Cohort 1: Overall Survival, defined as death by any cause from the time of enrollment will be measured. Any patient who has not died by the analysis date will be censored. Sub-analyses for cancer types will be conducted.
Up to 5 years
Cohort 2: Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months
Cohort 2: Health-related quality of life will be measured using the PROMIS Global Health 10-item instrument in all participants The PROMIS Global Health is a comprehensive tool designed to assess an individual's overall physical, mental, and social health and includes 10 items that cover various health domains. These items are divided into two main components: Global Physical Health and Global Mental Health. Global Physical Health: This includes items related to physical functioning, pain, fatigue, and overall physical health. Global Mental Health: This includes items related to mental health, emotional distress, and social health.Response Options: Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating better health.Raw Scores: The responses are summed to create raw scores for both the Global Physical Health and Global Mental Health components.
Baseline and 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: William A Wood, MD, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 3, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 10, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • LCCC2334

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on Central oncology navigation (SOC)

Subscribe