The Effects of Different Types of Foot Orthosis in Adults With Compensatory Forefoot Varus

October 3, 2022 updated by: Yi-Fen Shih, National Yang Ming University

Forefoot varus is a type of foot deformities. It is asociate with subtalar joint hyperpronation, and cause too much stress over tissues around foot and lower leg during weight bearing activities.

One of the common interventions for forefoot varus is to use foot orthosis with medial forefoot wedge to accommodate the forefoot deformity. Forefoot varus has been considered as an osseus deformity and caused by insufficient talar torsion during development. However, recent studies have reported forefoot varus may not be an osseus deformity. They might be a result of soft tissue adaption. For example, subtalar joint hyperpronation and ankle equinus could lead to forefoot supination/compensatory forefoot varus, which could be mistaken for osseus forefoot varus after a long period of time. If compensatory forefoot varus is caused by soft tissue adaptions, these adaptions may have a chance to reverse.

Nowadays, orthoses which applying medial forefoot wedge to accommodate the deformity for forefoot varus deformity, and the other type orthoses which applying rearfoot medial wedge and arch support are both used in subject with forefoot varus deformity.

However, some colleges claims that using medial forefoot wedge to accommodate the deformity of forefoot varus, the deformity may be fixed after a long-term period. However, there were no studies compare the effect of arch support orthosis that with and without medial forefoot wedge.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Forefoot varus is a type of foot deformities. It is asociate with subtalar joint hyperpronation, and cause too much stress over tissues around foot and lower leg during weight bearing activities.

One of the common interventions for forefoot varus is to use foot orthosis with medial forefoot wedge to accommodate the forefoot deformity. Forefoot varus has been considered as an osseus deformity and caused by insufficient talar torsion during development. However, recent studies have reported forefoot varus may not be an osseus deformity. They might be a result of soft tissue adaption. For example, subtalar joint hyperpronation and ankle equinus could lead to forefoot supination/compensatory forefoot varus, which could be mistaken for osseus forefoot varus after a long period of time. If compensatory forefoot varus is caused by soft tissue adaptions, these adaptions may have a chance to reverse.

Nowadays, orthoses which applying medial forefoot wedge to accommodate the deformity for forefoot varus deformity, and the other type orthoses which applying rearfoot medial wedge and arch support are both used in subject with forefoot varus deformity.

However, some colleges claims that using medial forefoot wedge to accommodate the deformity of forefoot varus, the deformity may be fixed after a long-term period. However, there were no studies compare the effect of arch support orthosis that with and without medial forefoot wedge.

In consideration of few studies have been done for investigating the effects of different orthoses in subjects with flat foot combined forefoot varus. Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of different foot orthoses designs on improving pain, muscle activity and displacement of center of pressure. We hypothesized that both orthoses will have the better effect on improving pain than placebo orthoses ,and muscle activity and displacement of center of pressure of arch support orthoses group will have change which close to normal foot.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 11221
        • National Yang Ming University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 48 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Flexible flatfoot
  • Angle of forefoot varus > 6 degree
  • Feel leg or foot pain when walking or exercising, and pain visual analogue scale > 3 points
  • The duration of wearing shoes > 30 he per week

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Rigid flatfoot
  • Leg length discrepancy > 1cm
  • Angle of Hallux valgus > 20 degree
  • With any nerve problem or disease
  • Used to have trauma over lower limbs
  • Had any severe joint deformity or osteoarthritis over lower limbs
  • Had any acute injury (in two weeks and inflammation)
  • Had wearing insole for 6 months
  • Can't follow order

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arch support orthoses with forefoot medial wedge
The intervention of this group include orthoses with arch support and added forefoot medial wedge.
The degree of forefoot wedge will be 3 degree. If needed, it could be adjusted. The subjects need to wear the orthoses for at least 30 hour per week during the experiment.
Other Names:
  • Forefoot medial wedge
Experimental: Arch support orthoses
The intervention of this group include orthoses with arch support.
The arch support of the orthoses could be adjusted depends on the evaluation of subject. The subjects need to wear the orthoses for at least 30 hour per week during the experiment.
Sham Comparator: Flat insole
This group will wear a flat insole. It is made from ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer with 4mm thickness. It only provide shock absorbtion.
The flat insole used as a placebo intervention. The shape of this insole is flat, and made by soft EVA. It only provide shock absorbtion without any support. The subjects need to wear the orthoses for at least 30 hour per week during the experiment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Foot function index
Time Frame: Baseline
This questionnaire includes 23 questions. These questions are about how difficult or pain over foot when subjects doing some functional activities.
Baseline
Foot function index
Time Frame: 6-week intervention
This questionnaire includes 23 questions. These questions are about how difficult or pain over foot when subjects doing some functional activities.
6-week intervention
Pain visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline
The scale is from 0 to 10 points. Zero means no pain, and ten points means extremely painful over subject's foot or leg.
Baseline
Pain visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 6-week intervention
The scale is from 0 to 10 points. Zero means no pain, and ten points means extremely painful over subject's foot or leg.
6-week intervention
Change From Baseline in Global Rating of Change Scale (GROC)
Time Frame: change from baseline at 6 weeks later
To measure improvements in a patient's condition. The minimum value is -7 and it means a very great deal worse. The maximum values is +7 and it means a very great deal better.
change from baseline at 6 weeks later

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Displacement of center of force of gait cycle (medial-lateral and anterior-posterior)
Time Frame: Baseline and after 6-week intervention
To determine the displacement of Cof during ambulation. We use F-Scan In-Shoe system to determine dynamic pressure, force and timing information. And to calculate the displacement of center of force of each gait cycle.
Baseline and after 6-week intervention
Muscle activity of tibialis anterior muscle, peroneal longus and abductor hallucis brevis
Time Frame: Baseline and after 6-week intervention
Muscle activity during ambulation and single leg standing. We use electromyography to record muscle activity of tibialis anterior muscle, peroneal longus and abductor hallucis brevis.
Baseline and after 6-week intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Yi-Fen Shih, PhD, Department of Physical Therapy and Assistive Technology, National Yang-Ming University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 5, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 22, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 1, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Flat Feet

Clinical Trials on Arch support orthoses with forefoot medial wedge

3
Subscribe