Prospective Follow-up of the Prevision Hip Stem With Comparison of Different Implant Variants (PREMO)

April 30, 2026 updated by: Aesculap AG
The study design is confirmative for non-inferiority of the functional outcome of the implants and is intended to examine the safety and performance of the Prevision hip stem. The study is an observational post-market clinical follow-up study, and the study sites chose the stem variant depending on their own routine and indication.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Generally, the advantage of the Prevision implant family is that all implant variants can be implanted with basically the same instrumentation, which makes it easier to switch to another variant. All implant variants will be available at the study sites and switching between the variants in the study will be encouraged.

The aim of the study is to prove the non-inferiority of the OHS functional outcome after two years to the predecessor implant generation, and comparable revision hip stems. In addition, the patient groups treated with the different variants, and outcome of these subgroups will be descriptively compared.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Hanover, Germany, 30625
        • Recruiting
        • Orthopädische Kliniken im Annastift, MHH, Anna-von-Borries-Str. 1-7
        • Contact:
          • Henning Windhagen, Prof. Dr.
    • Cambridgeshire
      • Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom, PE29 6NT
        • Recruiting
        • Hinchingbrooke Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Vijay Killampalli

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with indication of a hip revision

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Revision hip arthroplasty patients treated with a Prevision hip stem
  • Written patient informed consent
  • Patients are able to attend at follow-up examinations

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients < 18 years at surgery
  • Pregnancy at implantation
  • Patients held in a custodial setting
  • Patients in a relationship of dependence on the sponsor, the clinic or the investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional outcome of the hip revision surgery
Time Frame: after two years
Oxford Hip Score:The Oxford Hip Score (OHS) is a joint-specific, patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess disability in patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR)
after two years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Kaplan-Meier survival
Time Frame: after two years

Kaplan-Meier Analysis is a standard statistical method to describe the survival of human subjects or medical products over a defined time period. The revision-free survival rate is the performance indicator of the product under investigation and confirms the clinical outcome of the knee prosthesis. Information on survival of the implant will be collected until the last follow-up of the study patients took place.

  1. revision for any reason
  2. hip stem revision
  3. aseptic hip stem revision
after two years
EQ-5D-5L Quality of Life
Time Frame: visits after 2 and 5 years
EQ-5D is a standardized 5-dimension 5-level measure of the health status and is developed by the EuroQol Group in order to have a simple and generic measure for clinical and economic assessment. Instructions for the user are directly included into the questionnaire and it consists of two pages. One cover five different dimensions (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) and the other one the EQ visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS). The VAS scale records the self rated health status of the patient from the level "the worst health you can imagine" to "the best health you can imagine".
visits after 2 and 5 years
Complications
Time Frame: visits after 2 and 5 years
visits after 2 and 5 years
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: visits after 2 and 5 years

Patient reported four-scale evaluation:

  • very satisfied
  • satisfied
  • unsatisfied
  • very unsatisfied
visits after 2 and 5 years
Pain (VAS Score)
Time Frame: visits after 2 and 5 years

VAS Pain at Rest:

0-100, lower is better

VAS Pain under load:

0-100, lower is better

Patients are asked to mark a point on the line that corresponds to their current level of pain. This mark is then measured and converted into a numerical value, usually between 0 and 10 or 0 and 100, where 0 indicates no pain and the highest value indicates the most severe pain

visits after 2 and 5 years
Radiology: Hip stem subsidence
Time Frame: visits after 2 and 5 years
Hip stem subsidence in mm.
visits after 2 and 5 years
Qualitative radiologic assessment
Time Frame: visits after 2 and 5 years
Fracture healing; if radiolucent line > 2 mm, resorption, hypertrophy, cyst
visits after 2 and 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Henning Windhagen, Prof. Dr., Orthopädische Kliniken im Annastift, MHH

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 7, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2033

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2034

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 2, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 3, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Clinical Trials on Prevision Revision hip endoprosthesis stem implantation

Subscribe