Exercise Intervention Targeting Hip Strengthening Compared to Usual Care in Patients Undergoing Revision Hip Replacement (StrongHip)

January 10, 2024 updated by: University of Aarhus

Effect of an Exercise Intervention Targeting Hip Strengthening in Patients Undergoing Revision Total Hip Replacement - a Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial (The Strong Hip Trial)

There is sparse evidence on revision total hip replacement (THR), regarding the effectiveness on pain and function, and no consensus exists on optimal rehabilitation after revision THR. Further, patients undergoing revision THR achieve worse clinical outcomes on hip pain and function compared to patients undergoing primary THR. The primary aim of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the clinical effectiveness of a partly tele-delivered exercise intervention targeting hip strengthening with the standard community-based rehabilitation (usual care) in patients undergoing revision THR. The investigators will test the hypothesis that the exercise intervention targeting hip strengthening is superior to standard community-based rehabilitation in improving physical function measured with the 30-second Chair Stand Test at 16-week follow-up.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There is sparse evidence on revision total hip replacement (THR), regarding the effectiveness on pain and function, and no consensus exists on optimal rehabilitation after revision THR. Revision THR is one of the more technically challenging orthopedic surgeries and patients undergoing revision THR report improvements in pain and function. Nevertheless, patients undergoing revision THR achieve worse clinical outcomes on hip pain and function compared to patients undergoing primary THR. This calls for research exploring different rehabilitation approaches, in order to improve clinical outcomes for patients after revision THR.

This study aims to compare the clinical effectiveness of a partly tele-delivered exercise intervention targeting hip strengthening with the standard community-based rehabilitation (usual care) in patients undergoing revision THR.

This randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded trial is a multicenter trial involving hospitals and municipality rehabilitation centers across Denmark. Eligible patients undergoing revision THR will be randomized into two groups: A partly remotely-delivered hip strengthening rehabilitation intervention (strength group) or usual care (control group).

The exercise intervention targeting hip strengthening will partly follow the Neuromuscular Exercise (NEMEX) program as described by Eva Ageberg et al., and the intervention is further modified based on expert opinion from patients' experience with rehabilitation from a prior qualitative study. Usual care consists of rehabilitation in the municipalities, where it is up to the individual physiotherapist and the municipality to organize the rehabilitation, which is why both type, content, and duration may vary.

The primary outcome will be change in functional performance measured by the 30-second Chair Stand Test. Outcomes will be measured at baseline, after 16 weeks of intervention, and at 12-month follow-up.

The investigators hypothesize that the exercise intervention targeting hip strengthening is superior to usual care in improving physical function measured with the 30-second Chair Stand Test at 16-week follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

84

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Aarhus, Denmark, 8000
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Aarhus University
      • Aarhus N, Denmark, 8200
      • Herning, Denmark, 7400
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Gødstrup Hospital
      • Odense, Denmark, 5000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Odense University Hospital
      • Silkeborg, Denmark, 9640
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Regional Hospital Silkeborg
      • Vejle, Denmark, 7100
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Vejle Hospital
      • Viborg, Denmark, 8800
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Regional Hospital Viborg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing first revision THR
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Motivated to participate in an exercise program for 16 weeks
  • Provided informed consent to participate
  • Patients who has the cup and/or stem replaced or a combination of liner and caput replaced
  • Patients who can be baseline tested (chair stand test, stair climb test, 40m walking test)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dependency of wheelchair
  • Preplanned other lower limb surgery within 12 months
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) score > 40
  • Currently undergoing cancer treatment, e.g. chemo-, immuno-, or radiotherapy.
  • Comorbidities that prevent exercise
  • Inadequacy in written and spoken Danish
  • Mentally unable to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Strength group
Group 1
An initial 16-week exercise intervention of 45 minutes of training 3 times a week in the patient's own home or at a rehabilitation center. Patients will be instructed by a physiotherapist during the first 3 sessions, in order to be able to perform the exercises at home. Subsequently, there are physiotherapist-supervised sessions once every second week. The delivery of the supervised sessions is based on the patient's preferences, either by physical attendance or remotely in the patient's home. The intervention will consist of 4 exercises adapted from the NEMEX program targeting lower extremity muscle strength, stability, postural function, and postural orientation. Progression is made when an exercise is performed with good sensorimotor control and good performance quality and with minimal exertion and adequate movement control. Progression is primarily provided by 3 levels of difficulty and secondly by varying the number of repetitions or where possible, by increasing the weight load.
Active Comparator: Control group
Group 2
The intervention will consist of a rehabilitation intervention corresponding to standard care in the participating municipalities (i.e. content and duration of intervention). The intervention will be delivered individually or as group training, based on a clinical assessment of the individual patients' needs. The intervention can be supported by home-based exercises following instruction from a physiotherapist, supplemented by the provision of written information or access to a virtual training program. The intervention occurs in either the rehabilitation center's gym or the patient's home. The training sessions may consist of some of the following parameters: Strength training, stretching, functional training e.g. walking and stair climbing, stability training, balance training, endurance training, and gait correction.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in functional performance measured by the 30-seconds chair stand test
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 16-week, and 12-month follow-up.
The 30-second chair stand test is a valid and reliable measure of lower-extremity muscle strength evaluating sit-to-stand function, which is limited in people undergoing hip replacement.
Measured at baseline, 16-week, and 12-month follow-up.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) pain subscale
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 16-week, and 12-month follow-up.
The HOOS pain subscale is a 10-item patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess hip pain in patients with hip osteoarthritis. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better pain status.
Measured at baseline, 16-week, and 12-month follow-up.
Change in the HOOS symptoms subscale
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 16-week, and 12-month follow-up.
The HOOS symptom subscale is a five-item patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess other hip symptoms in patients with hip osteoarthritis. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better symptom status.
Measured at baseline, 16-week, and 12-month follow-up.
Change in the HOOS activities of daily living (ADL) function subscale
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 16-week, and 12-month follow-up.
The HOOS ADL function subscale is a 17-item patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess ADL function in patients with hip osteoarthritis. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better ADL function status.
Measured at baseline, 16-week, and 12-month follow-up.
Change in the HOOS quality-of-life subscale
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 16-week, and 12-month follow-up.
The HOOS quality-of-life subscale is a four-item patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess hip-related quality-of-life in patients with hip osteoarthritis. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality-of-life status.
Measured at baseline, 16-week, and 12-month follow-up.
Change in the HOOS sports and recreation subscale
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 16-week, and 12-month follow-up.
The HOOS sports and recreation subscale is a four-item patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess sports and recreation function in patients with hip osteoarthritis. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better sports and recreation status.
Measured at baseline, 16-week, and 12-month follow-up.
Change in 40m Fast-Paced Walk Test (40m-FPWT)
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 16-week, and 12-month follow-up.
The 40m-FPWT is a physical function test designed to measure the ability to walk quickly over short distances and is measured as the time it takes to complete a 40 m course at a fast walking pace.
Measured at baseline, 16-week, and 12-month follow-up.
Change in 9-step Timed Stair Climb Test (9-step TSCT)
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 16-week, and 12-month follow-up.
The 9-step TSCT is a physical function test designed to measure lower body strength and balance as well as ascending and descending stair activity and is measured as the time it takes to ascend and descend a 9-step stair.
Measured at baseline, 16-week, and 12-month follow-up.
Change in leg extension muscle power (watt/kg body weight)
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 16-week, and 12-month follow-up.
The Nottingham Power Rig (NPR) is used to measure leg extensor muscle power. The NPR measures the power output in total watt and watt pr. bodyweight in kilograms from a seated push on a flat pedal which is transmitted by a lever and chain to spin a flywheel. The NPR is a safe and reliable method to measure explosive knee extensor muscle power and has been validated as a clinically important measure of muscle function in elderly individuals.
Measured at baseline, 16-week, and 12-month follow-up.
Global Perceived Effect (GPE)
Time Frame: Measured at 16-week and 12-month follow-up.
The GPE will be used as a measure of patient-rated recovery and will be assessed for three domains; pain, activities of daily living, and quality of life rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 'very bad' (worst) to 'very good' (best)
Measured at 16-week and 12-month follow-up.
AE (Adverse Events) & Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
Time Frame: Registered throughout the 12-month study period.
Continuous registration of health issues and injuries. The events will be monitored by the physiotherapists supervising the exercise sessions. Further, patients will be asked at 4- and 12-month follow-ups about potential AE and SAE using open-probe questions.
Registered throughout the 12-month study period.
Adherence to the 16-week intervention
Time Frame: Registered throughout the 16-week initial intervention.
High adherence is defined as attendance in ≥75% of the exercise sessions.
Registered throughout the 16-week initial intervention.
Drop-outs
Time Frame: Registered throughout the 12-month study period.
Number of drop-out from the interventions.
Registered throughout the 12-month study period.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical activity
Time Frame: Measured at 12-week and 12-month follow-up.
Physical activity will be measured by The International Physical Activity Questionnaires (IPAQ), which is a 7 items questionnaire consisting of open-ended questions surrounding the patient's last 7-day recall of physical activity.
Measured at 12-week and 12-month follow-up.
Change in pain measured on a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 16-week, and 12-month follow-up.
NRS pain score will be measured before and after each exercise session and at each follow-up evaluation before completing the functional performance tests. The 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing "no pain" (best) to '10' representing "worst pain imaginable" (worst).
Measured at baseline, 16-week, and 12-month follow-up.
Change in EuroQol Group 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 16-week, and 12-month follow-up.
The EQ-5D-5L is a five-item patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess generic health-related quality of life. The total score of the descriptive index and EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) ranges from -0.624 (worst) to 1.000 (best) and 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health), respectively.
Measured at baseline, 16-week, and 12-month follow-up.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Martin B Stisen, MSc, Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University
  • Study Director: Alma B Pedersen, Prof., Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University
  • Study Director: Troels Kjeldsen, MSc, Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University
  • Study Director: Inger Mechlenburg, Prof., Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 25, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 20, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • StrongHip

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Anonymised patient-level data for the primary and all secondary outcome measures will be made available if required by the scientific journal, in which the results of the trial are published.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available after publication of the trial.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data access will be reviewed by the author group. Requesters will be required to sign a Data Access Agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Clinical Trials on Exercise Intervention Targeting Hip Strengthening

3
Subscribe