Piloting a School-Based Distress Tolerance Skills Program for Adolescents (STRIDE)

March 19, 2025 updated by: Bonnie Nagel, Oregon Health and Science University

The STRIDE Study (Strengthening Tolerance and Resilience in Dealing with Emotions): Pilot Testing of a School-Based Distress Tolerance Skills Program for Reducing Risk of Psychopathology in Adolescence

Research suggests that an individual's perceived ability to withstand distressing or upsetting emotions (i.e., distress tolerance; DT) is a common risk factor across several mental health conditions that commonly emerge during adolescence. This study aims to evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and initial efficacy of a classroom-based DT skills training program for middle school students. This study will also explore associations between changes in DT and internalizing symptoms (e.g., anxiety, depression).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A variety of deleterious mental health conditions have their peak age of onset in adolescence, including depression and anxiety. Distress tolerance (DT) - defined as the perceived or actual ability to withstand aversive emotional states - has been postulated as a transdiagnostic risk factor across several "emotional" disorders that typically emerge during adolescence. Importantly, while there is compelling evidence that DT is associated with emotion dysregulation and symptom severity, it is unclear whether modifying DT can reduce future risk for psychopathology in adolescent populations. This proposal aims to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and initial efficacy of a classroom-based DT intervention for middle school students. Additionally, this proposal will examine associations between changes in DT and internalizing symptoms.

Primary Objective:

To evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy of a classroom-based DT skills training program for middle school students.

Secondary Objectives:

To examine whether participation in the DT skills training program is associated with lower severity of internalizing symptoms over the course of the academic year.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

74

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Oregon
      • Beaverton, Oregon, United States, 97078
        • Valley Catholic Middle School

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Middle school aged-youth attending Valley Catholic Middle School in grade 6, 7, or 8

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Distress Tolerance Skills Training
Students will participate in a series of classroom-based lessons aimed at increasing distress tolerance.
These lessons are adapted from "DBT Skills in Schools: Skills Training for Emotional Problem Solving for Adolescents (DBT STEPS-A)" by Mazza et al. and include elements of mindfulness training, psychoeducation about emotions, and techniques/skills for managing extreme emotions.
No Intervention: Standard Curriculum (Control)
Students will not participate in the distress tolerance skills training. They will receive only their standard curriculum during class time.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and immediately post-intervention
Consent rates during enrollment and attrition rates during the study will be used to assess the feasibility of the intervention.
Pre-intervention and immediately post-intervention
Acceptability
Time Frame: Immediately post-intervention
The investigators will use a brief feedback survey at the end of the study to gather information about participants' experiences of the intervention. Responses on this survey will be used to determine the acceptability of the intervention.
Immediately post-intervention
Distress Tolerance
Time Frame: Pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up
The investigators will assess change in distress tolerance from pre-intervention to post-intervention. Distress tolerance will be indexed by total scores on the Distress Tolerance Scale (DTS), which is a 15-item self-report measure that assesses the respondent's perceived ability to withstand distressing or upsetting emotional states. Possible total scores can range from 15 to 75. Higher scores indicate higher distress tolerance. This outcome measure will be examined and compared for both the intervention group and the control group.
Pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Internalizing Symptoms
Time Frame: Pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up
The investigators will assess change in internalizing symptoms from pre-intervention to post-intervention and periodically during follow-up. Internalizing symptoms will be measured using the ASEBA Youth Self-Report (YSR). Possible raw scores on the Internalizing Symptoms Subscale can range from 0 to 62. Raw scores are transformed to standardized T-scores normed by age and gender and can range from 26 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater symptoms. This outcome measure will be examined and compared for both the intervention group and the control group.
Pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bonnie Nagel, PhD, Oregon Health and Science University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 25, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY00027611

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Distress, Emotional

Clinical Trials on Distress Tolerance Skills Training

Subscribe