Promotion of RSV Immunization Through Multiple Efforts (PRIME)

December 1, 2025 updated by: Jeannie Kelly, Washington University School of Medicine

Pilot Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial for RSV Vaccine Uptake in Pregnancy

Central hypothesis: a multimodal approach is needed to enhance RSV vaccine uptake in pregnancy rather than the current standard of care that relies solely on physician recommendations at routine prenatal visits and/or mass messaging to the public. The investigators propose a pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) to evaluate the effectiveness of a bundle of evidence-based and sequential strategies to test early (28-30 weeks gestation) and late (34-36 weeks gestation efficacy) to increase RSV vaccination during pregnancy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the leading cause of hospitalization and death among infants. Each year, up to 80,000 children are hospitalized due to RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infection, with infants having the highest risk. 50% of childhood deaths from RSV are in infants <6 months old. 1 in every 28 deaths among children aged 28 days to 6 months are attributed to RSV. Childhood RSV is also associated with long-term morbidity particularly a 12-fold higher risk of developing asthma. RSV prevention strategies are urgently needed to protect young infants particularly given their vulnerable immunity at birth. Passive immunity via transfer of IgG antibodies from immunized pregnant women offers an evidence-based solution and is endorsed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Centers for Disease Control. In 2023, the FDA approved the RSVpreF vaccine for use during 32-36 weeks of pregnancy to protect infants from RSV-associated respiratory infection.

Despite the availability of the RSVpreF vaccine and formal guidelines recommending this vaccine in pregnancy during the 2023 RSV season, RSV vaccine uptake among pregnant individuals at our center was astoundingly low. In a review of 676 eligible patients, less than 10% received the RSV vaccine. Similar trends were seen with the COVID-19 and influenza vaccines in pregnancy where pregnant individuals were vaccinated at half of the rate of non-pregnant individuals. General barriers and facilitators for antenatal vaccine uptake have been well studied and are centered on provider recommendation, women's knowledge and beliefs about the safety of the vaccine, and logistical barriers such as on site availability. However, a recent initiative to offer on-site COVID-19 vaccination at a high risk pregnancy clinic resulted in only a 3% uptake of the vaccine among eligible, high-risk obstetric patients, suggesting that vaccine hesitancy, not availability, is a critical driver of the low vaccination rates in this population. Therefore, novel and multiple interventions are needed to address patient motivation and hesitancy, in addition to vaccine availability, to optimize vaccine uptake in pregnancy.

The central hypothesis is that a multimodal approach is needed to enhance RSVpreF vaccine uptake in pregnancy rather than the current standard of care that relies solely on physician recommendations at routine prenatal visits and/or mass messaging to the public. The investigators propose a pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) to evaluate the effectiveness of a bundle of evidence-based and sequential strategies and test the following aims:

Aim 1: Assess the effectiveness of early (28-30 week) and low-intensity interventions to increase prenatal RSV vaccination uptake The investigators will compare vaccination uptake rates among pregnant patients 28-30 weeks gestation who are randomized to receive one of two low-intensity and universally acceptable interventions: physician counseling at prenatal visits vs routine counseling + patient visual aid administration (Figure 1). The investigators hypothesize that the combination of a visual aid with routine counseling will increase vaccination uptake rates by 34 weeks gestation. The investigators will explore whether demographic, clinical, or psychosocial factors modify the effects of each intervention.

Aim 2: Assess the effectiveness of late (34-36 week) higher-intensity interventions to increase prenatal RSV vaccination uptake for those who remain unvaccinated at 34 weeks gestation. The investigators will compare vaccination uptake rates in patients who remain unvaccinated at 34 weeks between two higher-intensity interventions: targeted patient phone calls encouraging vaccination versus individual physician reminders on the day of patient appointment. The investigators hypothesize that targeted patient calls will result in the highest vaccination uptake rates due to prior literature supporting the efficacy of this intervention. The investigators will explore whether demographic, clinical, or psychosocial factors modify the effects of each intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University in St. Louis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Confirmed intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) at 28-30 weeks.
  2. No contraindications to the RSV vaccine: history of severe allergic reaction to any vaccine component or active moderate/severe acute illness with or without fever or receipt of RSV vaccine during the pregnancy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those who do not have confirmed IUP at 28-30 weeks, or who have a contraindication to the RSV vaccine (history of severe allergic reaction to any vaccine component or active moderate/severe acute illness with or without fever or receipt of RSV vaccine during the pregnancy) will be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Routine counseling
Randomized to routine counseling at 28-30 weeks
Active Comparator: Routine counseling + MyChart nurse managing
Randomized to routine counseling at 28-30 weeks; not vaccinated by 34 weeks, and randomized to receive a MyChart message from the nurse encouraging vaccination at 34 weeks
Receipt of a MyChart nurse message around 34 weeks encouraging RSV vaccination
Active Comparator: Routine counseling + SMFM video
Randomized to routine counseling at 28-30 weeks; not vaccinated by 34 weeks, and randomized to watch the SMFM video on RSV vaccination at a prenatal visit at 34 weeks
Receipt of SMFM video around 34 weeks encouraging RSV vaccination
Active Comparator: Routine counseling/visual aid
Randomized to routine counseling and receipt of a visual aid encouraging RSV vaccination at 28-30 weeks
Receipt of a visual aide encouraging RSV vaccination at 28-30 wks
Active Comparator: Routine counseling/visual aid + MyChart nurse message
Randomized to routine counseling and receipt of a visual aid encouraging RSV vaccination at 28-30 weeks; not vaccinated by 34 weeks, and randomized to receive a MyChart message from the nurse encouraging vaccination at 34 weeks
Receipt of a MyChart nurse message around 34 weeks encouraging RSV vaccination
Receipt of a visual aide encouraging RSV vaccination at 28-30 wks
Active Comparator: Routine counseling/visual aid + SMFM video
Randomized to routine counseling and receipt of a visual aid encouraging RSV vaccination at 28-30 weeks; not vaccinated by 34 weeks, and randomized to watch the SMFM video on RSV vaccination at a prenatal visit at 34 weeks
Receipt of SMFM video around 34 weeks encouraging RSV vaccination
Receipt of a visual aide encouraging RSV vaccination at 28-30 wks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Vaccinated for RSV by delivery
Time Frame: Between 32 weeks and delivery, usually around 40 weeks gestation
Vaccinated for RSV by delivery
Between 32 weeks and delivery, usually around 40 weeks gestation
Feasibility Outcomes
Time Frame: From time of randomization through delivery; at most will be 15 weeks
Percent of patients eligible for Tier 1 randomization receiving randomization; Percent of patients eligible for Tier 2 randomization receiving randomization; Number of patients delivered prior to Tier 2 randomization, Number of patients assigned in Tier 1 and Tier 2 randomization receiving assignment, Number of patients declining assignment, Timeline for completion of N=50
From time of randomization through delivery; at most will be 15 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Vaccinated for RSV by 34 weeks
Time Frame: Pregnancy by 34 weeks
Vaccinated for RSV by 34 weeks
Pregnancy by 34 weeks
Receipt of Tdap during pregnancy
Time Frame: Between 27 weeks and delivery, usually around 40 weeks gestation
Receipt of Tdap during pregnancy
Between 27 weeks and delivery, usually around 40 weeks gestation
Receipt of Flu vaccine during pregnancy
Time Frame: During pregnancy, usually 40 weeks long
Receipt of Flu vaccine during pregnancy
During pregnancy, usually 40 weeks long
Receipt of COVID vaccine during pregnancy
Time Frame: During pregnancy, usually 40 weeks long
Receipt of COVID vaccine during pregnancy
During pregnancy, usually 40 weeks long

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 4, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 8, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pregnancy

Clinical Trials on MyChart nurse message

Subscribe