- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06643598
Healing Tiny Minds: Rural Recovery Through Virtual and Lived Experience Care
March 24, 2026 updated by: University of Wisconsin, Madison
The goal of this behavioral-interventional study is to learn if the Abecedarian Approach implemented virtually for children ages 0-5 with a history of Hypoxic Ischaemic Encephalopathy (HIE) and/or premature birth produces the same effects as when administered at in-person facilities.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
225
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Melisa Carrasco McCaul, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 608-577-2415
- Email: carrascomccaul@neurology.wisc.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53715
- Recruiting
- University of Wisconsin Madison
-
Contact:
- Melisa Carrasco McCaul, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 608-577-2415
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
IPNH-NDCP patients, including:
- Term-born children diagnosed during the neonatal period with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, or
- premature children (born at less than 28 weeks gestational age).
- Parent or legal guardian will also be enrolled as a participant
- Parents must be English-speaking (able to provide consent and complete questionnaires).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Not suitable for study participation due to other reasons at the discretion of the investigator.
- Infants with chromosomal abnormalities, genetic syndromes (for example, such as Down Syndrome or Trisomy18) and major congenital malformations will be excluded.
- Infants with vision impairment will also be excluded from the study, as our study procedures do require intact vision to be able to complete.
- For parents or legal guardians, there are no exclusion criteria.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Standard of Care Provided
In the No Intervention condition, at-risk children will receive the current standard of care, and no intervention.
|
|
|
Experimental: Virtual Abecedarian Approach Intervention
In the Virtual Abecedarian Approach Intervention, children will partake in the Abecedarian Approach Intervention through a virtual format.
|
The Abecedarian Approach is an early childhood behavioral education program that aims to improve the learning and cognitive development of children in high-risk or at-risk communities.
This study will test the efficacy of implementing this approach in a virtual format.
|
|
Experimental: Feasibility Group
Participants will be in fewer sessions in order to assess whether the intervention is accepted by the parents.
|
The Abecedarian Approach is an early childhood behavioral education program that aims to improve the learning and cognitive development of children in high-risk or at-risk communities.
This study will test the efficacy of implementing this approach in a virtual format.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Parent Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: Assessed at end of treatment (up to 60 months)
|
Questionnaire measuring parent satisfaction with the intervention and effects given at the end of the virtual program.
Responses as measured by answering either strongly agree, agree, disagree or strongly disagree.
Responses will be measured at the end of the intervention at 60 months and reported as participant counts.
|
Assessed at end of treatment (up to 60 months)
|
|
Number of Sessions Attended
Time Frame: Assessed biweekly from enrollment to end of treatment (up to 260 weeks)
|
We will be taking attendance of sessions to measure parent compliance with the virtual program.
Attendance will be taken for each live session (every other week) for the entire period of enrollment (260 weeks).
|
Assessed biweekly from enrollment to end of treatment (up to 260 weeks)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Bayley Assessment
Time Frame: Data collected at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 month time points
|
The Bayley is a cognitive and motor assessment conducted by an interventionalist to assess a child's development in these domains.
The highest possible score on a subtest or subdomain is 19, and the lowest score is 1.
Scores from 8-12 are considered average.
|
Data collected at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 month time points
|
|
Behavior Reporting Inventory of Executive Function - Preschool Version (BRIEF-P)
Time Frame: Data collected at the 24, 36, 48, and 60 month time points
|
Behavior is reported in the BRIEF-P.
Behaviors reported by parents can be used to predict later executive function exhibited by children.
List of statements provided about child's behavior, parent will answer whether this is never a problem (N), sometimes a problem (S), and often a problem (O).
Responses reported as participant counts, answering N more often is considered a better score.
|
Data collected at the 24, 36, 48, and 60 month time points
|
|
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL)
Time Frame: Data collected at baseline, 24, 36, 48 and 60 month time points
|
The PedsQL is an inventory of statements scored by reverse-scoring responses to a 5-point Likert scale and then transforming them to a 0-100 scale.
A higher score indicates a better quality of life.
|
Data collected at baseline, 24, 36, 48 and 60 month time points
|
|
Early Executive Functions Questionnaire (EEFQ)
Time Frame: Data collected at baseline, 12, and 24 month time points
|
A questionnaire is given to parents that assesses what executive functions children are exhibiting.
More functions exhibited means further along in executive function development.
EEFQ consists of 31 tasks parent is scoring child on, there are 7 options they can choose from regarding how that child performs the task, and in turn are scored 1-7 on the task.
Tasks listed as designed to measure cognitive executive function, which should be increasing with age, higher scores are indicative of higher cognitive executive function.
|
Data collected at baseline, 12, and 24 month time points
|
|
NIH Baby/Infant and NIH Pediatric Toolbox
Time Frame: Data collected at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60-month time points
|
A set of tests designed by the NIH administered electronically to children to assess attention, executive function, learning, memory, language, and numeracy/math.
A higher early childhood composite score indicates better performance and more of the concept being measured.
Early childhood composite score - 100 is the standard, ranges from 70 (extremely low functioning) -130 (extremely high functioning).
|
Data collected at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60-month time points
|
|
Infant Attention Task (IAT) measured in seconds
Time Frame: baseline and 12 months
|
A behavioral measure used with infants to assess attentional control and processing.
Infants are presented with visual puppet stimuli four distinct "looks", and researchers record looking time, shifts in attention, or habituation patterns.
More sustained attention in the early looks followed by habituation to the stimuli in the later looks often indicates better early attentional capacity.
Total accumulated looking time to a stimulus in visual preference-type tasks commonly ranges from roughly 15-30+ seconds per trial, depending on the infant's age and the stimulus.
|
baseline and 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Melisa Carrasco McCaul, MD, PhD, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
June 3, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2030
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2030
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 10, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 10, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
October 16, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 27, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 24, 2026
Last Verified
March 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Urogenital Diseases
- Cerebrovascular Disorders
- Brain Diseases
- Central Nervous System Diseases
- Vascular Diseases
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
- Obstetric Labor, Premature
- Obstetric Labor Complications
- Pregnancy Complications
- Brain Ischemia
- Signs and Symptoms, Respiratory
- Brain Damage, Chronic
- Hypoxia, Brain
- Hypoxia
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Signs and Symptoms
- Premature Birth
- Cerebral Palsy
- Nervous System Diseases
- Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2024-1658
- A535100 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
- Protocol Version 3/11/2026 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy
-
Ankara City Hospital BilkentRecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | Cerebral Palsy, Spastic, Diplegic | Diplegic Cerebral Palsy With Spasticity | Transcranial Magnetic StimilationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Lahore University of Biological and Applied SciencesRecruiting
-
Suleyman Demirel UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy | Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy | Spastic Diplegia Cerebral PalsyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)RecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | Hemiplegic Cerebral PalsyCanada
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy (CP) | Unilateral Cerebral PalsyEgypt
-
University of California, San FranciscoNot yet recruitingCerebral Palsy | Cerebral Palsy (CP) | Infant | Cerebral Palsy InfantileUnited States
-
Lahore University of Biological and Applied SciencesNot yet recruitingSpastic Diplegia Cerebral PalsyPakistan
-
IRCCS Fondazione Stella MarisNot yet recruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | EEG | Unilateral Cerebral Palsy | Action ObservationItaly
-
IRCCS Fondazione Stella MarisUniversity of Siena, ItalyRecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | Motor Imagery | CP (Cerebral Palsy) | Action ObservationItaly
-
University of LahoreCompletedCerebral Palsy (CP) | Spastic Diplegia Cerebral Palsy | Balance | Gross Motor FunctionsPakistan
Clinical Trials on Abecedarian Approach
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalUniversity of Campinas, BrazilUnknown
-
Sahlgrenska University HospitalVastra Gotaland RegionRecruitingMuscle Weakness | Muscle Atrophy | Hip Osteoarthritis | Arthroplasty Complications | Muscle InjurySweden
-
Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and PharmacyEmergency County Hospital Cluj-NapocaCompleted
-
Florida Orthopaedic InstituteOrthopaedic Trauma AssociationCompletedTibial FracturesUnited States
-
Medacta USAMedacta International SACompletedOsteoarthritisUnited States
-
Seoul National University Bundang HospitalCompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, HipKorea, Republic of
-
Sorlandet Hospital HFUnknown
-
Fraser Orthopaedic Research SocietyCompletedINfrapatellar Versus SUprapatellar Reamed Intramedullary Nailing for Fractures of the Tibia (INSURT)Tibial Fractures | Anterior Knee Pain SyndromeCanada, Spain
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedFacial Nerve Injuries | Subcondylar Process of Mandible Open FractureEgypt
-
Assiut UniversityUnknown