Validity and Reliability of the Mastitis Symptom Severity Assessment Methods (M-Score and BISSI) in Non-Lactational Mastitis

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Mastitis-score (M-score) and the Breast Inflammatory Symptom Severity Index (BISSI) as measures for assessing symptom severity in non-lactational granulomatous lobular/periductal mastitis (NL-GLM/PDM). This research aims to provide a valid and reliable tool for evaluating both symptom severity and treatment efficacy in NL-GLM/PDM.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Non-lactational granulomatous lobular/periductal mastitis (NL-GLM/PDM) are inflammatory breast diseases with unclear etiology, usually manifested as palpable breast mass, accompanied by breast pain and abscesses, erythema or fistula formation. There is no well-recognized assessment tool for evaluating the symptom severity and treatment efficacy of NL-GLM/PDM. In our previous studies with NL-GLM, we used the Mastitis-score (M-score) as a physician-directed measure of the symptom severity. However, there were no patient-reported outcome measure for NL-GLM/PDM. The Breast Inflammatory Symptom Severity Index(BISSI) was reported as a valid patient-reported outcome measure for lactational mastitis. Its clinical validity as a measure of Symptom Severity for NL-GLM/PDM are still unclear.

In this multicenter, prospective cohort study, we will validate the validity and reliability of the M-score, a physician-directed measure, and the Breast Inflammatory Symptom Severity Index (BISSI), a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure, for assessing symptom severity in patients with non-lactational granulomatous lobular/periductal mastitis (NL-GLM/PDM). Establishing the validity of these two approaches will facilitate the objective measurement of treatment efficacy for NL-GLM/PDM in the future.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

320

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Chaozhou, Guangdong, China, 521000
        • Chaozhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital
      • Dongguan, Guangdong, China, 523000
        • Dongguan Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510120
        • Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
      • Jiangmen, Guangdong, China, 529051
        • Jiangmen Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital
      • Shanwei, Guangdong, China, 516600
        • Shenshan Medical Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Female diagnosed with NL-GLM/PDM in China

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Female, age between 18 and 65 years;
  2. Clinically considered as Non-Lactational mastitis;
  3. Clinically and Pathologically confirmed NL-GLM/PDM;
  4. Patients planning to receive treatment or observation alone;
  5. Signed the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with confirmed or suspected malignant breast tumors
  2. Patients with bilateral mastitis (including those with bilateral Non-Lactational Mastitis occurring simultaneously or successively)
  3. Pregnant.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
1
This is an observational study with no predefined treatments for the enrolled patients. Participants may receive any treatments in accordance with standard clinical practice, based on physicians' recommendations and patients' preferences.
Participants may receive any treatments in accordance with standard clinical practice, based on physicians' recommendations and patients' preferences.
Other Names:
  • Corticosteroids
  • Surgery
  • Ductal lavage
  • Anti-TB treatments
  • Observations
  • Aspirations
  • Immuno-suppression medications

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Inter-rater Reliability
Time Frame: 8 weeks
This assesses the consistency of results from different evaluators regarding the various dimensions of the Mscore and the total M-score for the same patients at the same time.
8 weeks
Test-Retest Reliability
Time Frame: 8 weeks
This assesses the consistency of the M-score/BISSI results for the same patient at different times (within 1 week after enrollment), prior to treatment initiation and when symptoms have not changed significantly.
8 weeks
Clinical Validity
Time Frame: 8 weeks
This aims to estimate the correlation between the M-score/BISSI and its changes, and the BISSI and its changes, with traditional evaluator assessments or traditional patient self-assessments of treatment efficacy and its changes.
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation between the M-score/BISSI with laboratory indicators
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Explore the correlation between the M-score/BISSI with white blood cell counts, neutrophil counts, lymphocyte counts, neutrophil/lympocyte ratio, CRP, ESR, TNF-alpha, and IL-6.
8 weeks
Cutoff value for M-score/BISSI to defined clinical complete remission.
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Investigate the optimal cutoff value of the M-score/BISSI for defining clinical complete remission.
8 weeks
Correlation between the M-score and BISSI scores.
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Examine the correlation between the M-score and BISSI scores.
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 28, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 26, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 26, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

If the study can be completed and the data have been collected, sharing IPD with the approval from the administrator would be feasible.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Granulomatous Mastitis

Clinical Trials on Any treatments regimen

Subscribe