Comparison Between Atenolol,Propnalol and Ivabradine

October 31, 2024 updated by: rabab Mohammad habeeb, Menoufia University

Comparison Between Atenolol , Propnalol and Ivabradine as a Premedication for Bloodless Field Anesthesia in Lumbar Spine Surgery ,a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of this work is to compare atenolol, propranolol, and ivabradine as a premedication to achieve bloodless field anesthesia primarily controlling heart rate in lumbar spine surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study will investigate the effect of atenolol, propranolol, and ivabradine as oral premedication in adult patients undergoing LUMBAR SPINE SURGERY to achieve bloodless field anesthesia.

AIM OF THE WORK

  • The primary aim of this work is to compare atenolol, propranolol, and ivabradine as a premedication to achieve bloodless field anesthesia primarily controlling heart rate in lumbar spine surgery.
  • The secondary aims are to assess field visibility and measure the amount of blood loss in patients, and surgeon satisfaction and also to asses if there are any associated undesirable side effects of atenolol, propranolol, or Ivabradine will appear.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Menoufia Government
      • Shepien El Kom, Menoufia Government, Egypt, 32817
        • Menoufia University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA physical status I and II,

    • aged from 18 to 50 years old
    • scheduled for elective lumber spine surgeries will be included in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hypertension.
  • Hepatic or renal disease.
  • Diabetes Mellitus.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Coagulation disorders.
  • Anemia (Hb < 10 g/dL).
  • Ischemic heart disease
  • Drug or alcohol abuse.
  • Allergy to any of atenolol, propranolol, and ivabradine.
  • History of beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, Tricyclic antidepressants, anticoagulant or clonidine intake.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Atenolol Group
patients will be premedicated with atenolol (50mg)
patients will be premedicated with atenolol (50mg)
Active Comparator: propranolol Group
patients will be premedicated with propranolol (10mg)
patients will be premedicated with propranolol (10mg)
Active Comparator: Ivabradine Group
patients will be premedicated with Ivabradine (5mg)
patients will be premedicated with Ivabradine (5mg)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perioperative Heamodynamic Effect of the drugs
Time Frame: every 5 minutes for 15 minutes and then every 10 minutes till end of surgery, then every 15 minutes for 1hour in the recovery room
Heart rate
every 5 minutes for 15 minutes and then every 10 minutes till end of surgery, then every 15 minutes for 1hour in the recovery room

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood loss & surgical field visibility score
Time Frame: Intraoperative time
quality scale proposed by Fromm and Boezaart
Intraoperative time
Anesthetic consumption
Time Frame: Intraoperative time
Propofol, opioid, and isoflurane consumption
Intraoperative time
Incidence of complication
Time Frame: Intraoperative time
The patient will be examined for bradycardia, or tachycardia hypo or hypertension, shivering, respiratory depression, dizziness, visual disturbance, nausea, and vomiting
Intraoperative time
The need for blood transfusion
Time Frame: Intraoperative time
The need for blood transfusion
Intraoperative time

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

November 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intraoperative Bleeding

Clinical Trials on Atenolol 50 MG

Subscribe