Integrating Design Thinking Into Undergraduate Nursing Education

April 9, 2026 updated by: Carmen Chan Yip Wing-han, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Integrating Design Thinking Into Undergraduate Nursing Education: a Pilot RCT

Previous studies have demonstrated that design thinking workshops can indeed produce these effects in healthcare education settings. However, its effectiveness in nursing curriculum is inconclusive. This research project aims to introduce and integrate design thinking principles into the undergraduate nursing program at the Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), the Nethersole School of Nursing. By implementing a comprehensive study encompassing desktop research, a 3-hour introductory workshop, and pre- and post-evaluations over a 9-month period, the investigators seek to enhance nursing students' problem-solving skills, empathy, creativity, collaboration, and patient-centered care attitude.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Subjects A group of 50 second-year undergraduate nursing students at CUHK Nethersole School of Nursing who volunteer to participate in the research. Participants will be randomly assigned to either: i) Intervention group (n=25): Receives the design thinking workshop; ii) Control group (n=25): Receives no intervention (continues with regular curriculum). According to Hertzog (2008), a minimum of 25 subjects per group would be considered sufficient for the purposes of pilot testing. Students who have prior experience in joining design thinking workshop will be excluded.

Methodology This study employs a pilot randomized controlled design to evaluate the impact of a design thinking workshop on undergraduate nursing students' problem-solving abilities and related skills. The methodology encompasses a comprehensive literature review, pre- and post-workshop assessments, and a 3-hour introductory workshop on design thinking principles applied to healthcare challenges.

  1. Systematic review and preparation of material A systematic review will be conducted to examine existing applications of design thinking in healthcare education, particularly in nursing, informing workshop curriculum development in terms of content, delivery method and evaluation approach.
  2. Pre-Workshop Evaluation An online survey one month before the workshop will be conducted to assess participants' baseline skills and attitudes using validated instruments. These instruments measure problem-solving abilities, empathy, creativity, collaboration, and patient-centered care attitudes.
  3. Design Thinking Workshop A 3-hour introductory workshop will cover the five stages of design thinking: Empathize, Define, Ideate, Prototype, and Test. Students will work on scenario of real-world healthcare challenges, and apply design thinking principles to develop innovative solutions.
  4. Post-Workshop Evaluation Immediately after the workshop, participants will complete a post-workshop survey using the same instruments as the pre-workshop evaluation, allowing for comparison of scores.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

29

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • The Nethersole School of Nursing, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Undergraduate nursing students at CUHK Nethersole School of Nursing who volunteer to participate in the research.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Nil

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group
Participants in the experimental group will receive a 3-hour design thinking workshop. The workshop will cover the five stages of design thinking, allowing students to apply these principles to real-world healthcare challenges in their future practice
The workshop will cover the five stages of design thinking, allowing students to apply these principles to real-world healthcare challenges in their future practice.
No Intervention: Control group
will NOT receive design thinking workshop

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Problem-solving Abilities
Time Frame: Baseline
rating on the Eight subscales of capabilities in Student engagement questionnaire (SEQ) (1=Strongly disagree, 5= Strongly Agree)
Baseline
Problem-solving Abilities
Time Frame: immediately after workshop
rating on the Eight subscales of capabilities in Student engagement questionnaire (SEQ) (1=Strongly disagree, 5= Strongly Agree)
immediately after workshop

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Creativity
Time Frame: Baseline
rating on the Eight subscales of capabilities in Student engagement questionnaire (SEQ) (1=Strongly disagree, 5= Strongly Agree)
Baseline
Creativity
Time Frame: immediately after workshop
rating on the Eight subscales of capabilities in Student engagement questionnaire (SEQ) (1=Strongly disagree, 5= Strongly Agree)
immediately after workshop
Collaboration
Time Frame: Baseline
rating on the Eight subscales of capabilities in Student engagement questionnaire (SEQ) (1=Strongly disagree, 5= Strongly Agree)
Baseline
Collaboration
Time Frame: immediately after workshop
rating on the Eight subscales of capabilities in Student engagement questionnaire (SEQ) (1=Strongly disagree, 5= Strongly Agree)
immediately after workshop
Empathy
Time Frame: Baseline
rating on the Jefferson Scale of Empathy - Health Professions Student Version (JSE-HPS) (1=Strongly disagree, 5= Strongly Agree)
Baseline
Empathy
Time Frame: immediately after workshop
rating on the Jefferson Scale of Empathy - Health Professions Student Version (JSE-HPS) (1=Strongly disagree, 5= Strongly Agree)
immediately after workshop
Patient-centered Care attitude
Time Frame: Baseline
rating on the Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS), 1= strongly disagree, 5=strongly agree
Baseline
Patient-centered Care attitude
Time Frame: immediately after workshop
rating on the Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS), 1= strongly disagree, 5=strongly agree
immediately after workshop

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Carmen WH Chan, The Nethersole School of Nursing

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 31, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 4, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 24-0219
  • SBRE-24-0219 (Other Identifier: Survey and Behavioural Research Ethics)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nurse Training

Clinical Trials on Design thinking workshop

Subscribe