Magnetic Mallet and Densah Bur for Crestal Sinus Left

November 5, 2024 updated by: Hams Hamed Abdelrahman

Magnetic Mallet Versus Densah Bur for Crestal Sinus Left With Implant Placement in Maxilla (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)

Background: Implant placement in the posterior maxilla is problematic procedure, not only due to inferior properties of bone but also due to loss of vertical bone height, which happens after extraction of posterior teeth. When the required additional height is few millimeters, indirect transcrestal sinus lifting is recommended. Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate Densah bur versus Magnetic mallet in transcrestal sinus lifting procedure in edentulous molar and premolar maxillary region.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Alexandria, Egypt
        • Recruiting
        • Alexandria Faculty of Dentistry
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • mohamed abdelbaset, BDS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient seeking replacement of missing maxillary posterior teeth by dental implant procedure.
  • Residual bone height is (5-7) mm measured from crestal bone to sinus floor.
  • Both genders.
  • Good general health;
  • Good oral hygiene.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncontrolled Diabetes.
  • Coagulation disorders.
  • Immunological disorders.
  • Previous radiation of the head and neck region.
  • Presence of chronic systemic diseases;
  • Presence of acute or chronic sinus problems;
  • Alcohol or drug abuse;
  • Heavy smokers.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control Group
The implant motor will be adjusted on reverse-densifying mode with 800 to 1200 rpm. According to the desired implant dimension, it will be started with the smallest densah bur. The first densah bur will advanced in densifying mode with bouncing motion in and out movement with copious irrigation until.
Experimental: Test Group
The osteotome will be directly attached and pushed by magnetic mallet and a shock wave will be pushed on their tip. The electrical mallet will be imparted to osteotomes a longitudinal movement along a central axis moving up and down toward pilot bone hole providing a driving mechanism of longitudinal movements. Then the sinus lift instruments (Sweden and Martina) will be used to slowly lift the sinus. After that implant will be placed with the help of implant drilling device.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in pain socres
Time Frame: 3rd day, 1 week and 10 days
pain will be examined using visual analogue scale (VAS) 0 means no pain 10 means extreme pain
3rd day, 1 week and 10 days
change in implant stability
Time Frame: baseline and 4 months
will be measured by the Resonance Frequency Analysis using osstel
baseline and 4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in implant protrusion length
Time Frame: baseline and 4 months
Immediate post- operative CBCT (T1) will be done to measure the implant protrusion length (IPL) which is the length of the implant extending into the maxillary sinus.
baseline and 4 months
change in bone density
Time Frame: baseline and 4 months
it will be measured by CBCT
baseline and 4 months
change in prescence of complications
Time Frame: 3rd day, 1 week and 10 days
patients will be followed up to assess the occurence of any clincial complications
3rd day, 1 week and 10 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 814-12

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Maxillary Sinus Left

Clinical Trials on Electrical Mallet

Subscribe