Maxillary Sinus Elevation and Simultaneous Implant Placement

August 15, 2017 updated by: fatma fawzy kandel, Cairo University

MAXILLARY SINUS ELEVATION USING GELFOAM (ABSORBABLE GELATIN) VERSUS XENOGRAFT (TUTOGEN) and SIMULTANEOUS IMPLANT PLACEMENT:Randomized Clinical Trial

using gel foam [ absorbable gelatin ] in maxillary sinus elevation which act as a space maintainer and alternative to bone filler for new bone formation in the maxillary sinus and its advantages for patients undergoing maxillary sinus elevation with simultaneous implant placement as regards the implant stability and amount of bone height gain compared to conventional maxillary sinus elevation by xenograft.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

One of the main problem for posterior maxilla it becomes atrophic after extraction of the teeth and this followed by Pneumatization of the maxillary sinus, the atrophy of the alveolar process is a common reason for the limited availability of alveolar bone for implant placement in the posterior maxilla.

Numerous techniques designed to increase bone volume in the maxillary sinus region have been proposed. They were mostly based on the insertion of various materials into a void created between the sinus (Schneiderian) membrane and the bony walls of the maxillary sinus. (Sohn et al 2008) reported simultaneous placement of implants, and insertion of gelatin sponges demonstrate new bone formation through clinical and radiographic evaluations. New bone formation was verified by stabilization of the elevated sinus membrane from the tenting effect of placement of dental implants and absorbable gelatin sponge without any bone graft material. This study shows that there is great potential for new bone formation in the maxillary sinus without the use of additional bone grafts. Systemic review showed that the survival rate for implants utilizing xenografts was statistically the same as for implants placed in particulate autogenous bone grafts .

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 60 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:• Patients with atrophic maxilla and pneumatization of the maxillary sinus with residual bone height from 3 to 5mm .

  • Both sexes.
  • No intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology.
  • No systemic condition that contraindicate implant placement.

Exclusion Criteria:• Sinus pathology.

  • Heavy smokers more than 20 cigarettes per day .
  • Patients with systemic disease that may affect normal healing.
  • Psychiatric problems.
  • Disorders to implant are related to history of radiation therapy to the head and neck neoplasia, or bone augmentation to implant site.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: GELFOAM (ABSORBABLE GELATIN)

Sterile Sponge is a medical device intended for application to bleeding surfaces as a hemostatic. It is a water-insoluble, off-white, nonelastic.

it act as a space maintainer and alternative to bone filler for new bone formation in the maxillary sinus. It may be cut without fraying and is able to absorb and hold within its interstices, many times its weight of blood and other fluids its effect appears to be more physical than the result of altering the blood clotting mechanism. When placed in soft tissues, GELFOAM is usually absorbed completely within four to six weeks, without inducing excessive scar tissue

  • Three line mucoperiosteal pyramidal flap will be reflected in the posterior maxillary edentulous area to expose the lateral wall of the maxilla.
  • A diamond bur will be used to make a rectangular osteotomy.
  • The membrane will be carefully elevated from the lateral wall and floor of maxillary sinus with simultaneous implant placement.
  • Implant stability will be measured by osteal device
  • implant will be inserted with gelfoam (absorbable gelatin) for augmentation• The flap will then be copiously irrigated with saline in preparation for closure.
  • The flap will then be closed using interrupted 4/0 resorbable sutures.
Other Names:
  • (ABSORBABLE GELATIN)
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: XENOGRAFT (TUTOGEN)
xenografts as a sinus bone replacement graft ,The osteoconductive properties of xenografts in human sinus grafting have been well documented. They are due to both their chemical composition and their macro and micro morphology.The efficacy of xenografts as a sinus bone replacement graft may be due to combination of factors. Foremost would be the osteoconductive capacity of xenografts. In addition, they supply minerals that are necessary for bone formation, their density provides stability to the graft and the implants placed in them, and this density persists long term due to the fact that these grafts do not completely resorb.
  • Three line mucoperiosteal pyramidal flap will be reflected in the posterior maxillary edentulous area to expose the lateral wall of the maxilla.
  • A diamond bur will be used to make a rectangular osteotomy.
  • The membrane will be carefully elevated from the lateral wall and floor of maxillary sinus with simultaneous implant placement.
  • Implant stability will be measured by osteal device
  • implants will be inserted with xenograft for augmentation.• The flap will then be copiously irrigated with saline in preparation for closure.
  • The flap will then be closed using interrupted 4/0 resorbable sutures.
Other Names:
  • TUTOGEN

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Amount of bone gained:
Time Frame: 6 month
using linear measurements from Cone beam computed tomography
6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2017

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 17, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 17, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MI.cairouniversity

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Maxillary Sinus

Clinical Trials on GELFOAM

Subscribe