Cerebrolysin in Critically Ill Patients With Delirium

December 29, 2024 updated by: Wojciech Dąbrowski, Medical University of Lublin

The Usefulness of Cerebrolysin in Alleviating the Severity of Delirium in Critically Ill Patients

Delirium is a severe problem in critically ill patients, and it is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and extended stay in hospital. The pathophysiology of delirium is multifactorial and still poorly recognized. Several authors proposed different pathomechanisms of delirium. The most likely of these are a metabolic response to cerebral hypoxia/hyperoxia, oxidative stress with excessive reactive oxygen species production, neuroinflammation following general inflammatory response, disorders in neurotransmitters, especially impaired cholinergic and dopaminergic transmissions and dysregulation of tryptophan metabolisms including kynurenine and serotonin/melatonin pathways. The multifactorial pathomechanism of delirium significantly reduces targeted therapy. Due to cerebrolysin properties, it seems reasonable to conclude that this substance is effective in the prevention and treatment of delirium in critically ill patients. Cerebrolysin is commonly used in neurologic patients treated for dementia and Alzheimer's disease. It possesses antioxidative properties, which reduce the severity of post-ischaemic neuronal dysfunction and improve neuronal plasticity. It also increases acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase in a dose-dependent manner, improving neuronal plasticity.

Additionally, cerebrolysin reduces neuroinflammation and neuronal cell apoptosis by activating toll-like receptor pathways. These properties closely correspond to the pathomechanism of delirium.

Therefore, the aim of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of treatment with Cerebrolysin in critically ill patients with delirium.

This study enrolls adult critically ill patients. Prior to delirium detection, the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) is used to assess the level of consciousness. Patients with RASS-4 or -5 were excluded from the analysis, as these disorders of consciousness preclude the determination of the degree of delirium, which is a requisite component of the study. Delirium is detected by the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) and the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC). Additionally, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale is used to detect mild cognitive impairment. The primary endpoint of this study is an analysis of the prevalence and severity of delirium symptoms. The secondary endpoint is an analysis of the duration of delirium.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Detailed Description

This is an observational, interventional study. Adult critically ill patients treated with mechanical ventilation due to acute respiratory insufficiency complicating sepsis, septic shock, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and polytrauma patients without traumatic brain injury are enrolled to this study. All patients should be treated in accordance with the most up-to date recommendations for the specific disease. None of the patients should be treated with neuroprotective medication before the diagnosis of delirium. Patients are randomized into two groups: CBL - patients treated with cerebrolysin and K - control patients treated without cerebrolysin. Cerebrolysin is administered in a daily dose of 50ml, dissolved in 0.9% NaCl. This mixture is infused for one hour. The treatment is initiated when the delirium is detected and continued for seven consecutive days.

The diagnosis of delirium is based on four principal criteria of the CAM-ICU test: 1/ Sudden onset of disturbance, 2/ Lack of focus of attention, 3/ Altered state of consciousness, and 4/ Disorganised thinking. Of these, criterion feature 2 is regarded as the most crucial in establishing a diagnosis of delirium.

The ICDSC method takes into account eight criteria which include: The ICDSC method considers eight criteria that include: 1/ any disturbance of consciousness (RASS other than 0), 2/ attention deficit disorder, 3/ disorientation, 4/ hallucinations, 5/ psychomotor agitation or retardation, 6/ speech or mood disturbances, 7/ disturbance of sleep-wake cycle, 8/ diurnal variability of symptoms. One point is added for each criterion. A score of 4 points or higher indicates a diagnosis of full-blown delirium, while a score of 1 to 3 points indicates subclinical delirium.

The initial detection of delirium using the CAM-ICU and ICDSC scales is conducted one to three days after the cessation of sedative infusion when the patient's sedation level reaches 3 on the RASS scale. Subsequent follow-up analysis is performed on days 7-8 after the diagnosis of delirium.

The MoCA test is performed in the days 7-8. The MoCA test is assessed using the Geriatric Assessment Tool Kit (https://geriatrictoolkit.missouri.edu) with the following points: 1/ Short term memory, 2/ Visuospatial abilities, 3/ Executive functions, 4/ attention and concentration, 5/ working memory, 6/ language, 7/ Orientation to time and place. A score of 24 points or less is the cut-off for mild cognitive impairment, while 19 points or less for dementia diagnosis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Lublin
      • Lubin, Lublin, Poland, 20-090
        • First Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy Medical University of Lublin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age > 18,
  • symptoms of delirium,
  • critical illness treated in Intensive Care Unit

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • traumatic brain injury,
  • neuroinflammatory diseases

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cerebrolysin arm.
Patients in group CER received Cerebrolysin infusion at the dose of 50 mL solved in 0.9% NaCl for seven consecutive days, after delirium diagnose.
Patients were randomized into two groups: CBL - patients treated with cerebrolysin at the daily dose of 50 mL, and K - control patients treated without cerebrolysin. Cerebrolysin was administrated intravenously on the day the delirium was detected and then for seven consecutive days.
Placebo Comparator: Control arm.
Patients in group K (control) received 0.9% NaCl for seven consecutive days.
Patients enrolled in group K received the infusion of 0.9% Saline solution at a volume of 250 mL.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CAM-ICU test
Time Frame: seven days
Cerebrolysin, 50 mL daily administered intravenously for seven consecutive days, reduces or alleviates the severity of delirium detected by the CAM-ICU test.
seven days
ICDSC test
Time Frame: seven days
Cerebrolysin, 50 mL daily administered intravenously for seven consecutive days, reduces or alleviates the severity of delirium detected by the ICDSC test.
seven days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MoCA test
Time Frame: seven days
Cerebrolysin infusion at the dose of 50 mL daily administrated intravenously reduces or alleviates the severity of cognitive impairment detected by the MoCA test.
seven days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Impairment

Clinical Trials on Cerebrolysin

Subscribe