Keep-On-Keep-Up (KOKU)

April 27, 2026 updated by: Prof Emma Stanmore, University of Manchester

The Effectiveness of a Digital Falls Prevention Programme (KOKU) Versus Usual Care to Improve Balance, Falls Risk and Function in Older Adults

Falls are the primary cause of fatal and non-fatal accidental injuries in older adults. Around a third of community-dwelling older adults fall per year with high associated personal and societal costs. The World Falls Prevention Guidelines recommend balance challenging, functional exercise programmes for falls prevention but there can be low uptake and adherence in community settings. A digital, NHS approved programme Keep-On-Keep-Up (KOKU) was co-developed with older adults and therapists, to provide progressive, evidence-based exercises and to raise awareness of home hazards and ways to improve bone health, nutrition and hydration. This trial aims to investigate the effectiveness of the KOKU digital strength and balance programme for improving balance, function and reducing falls risk in community dwelling older adults.

Objective:

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an NHS (National Health Service) approved, digital falls prevention intervention; (Keep On Keep Up (KOKU) - see https://kokuhealth.com) for improving balance, maintaining function and reducing falls risk in community dwelling older adults.

Design:

A two-arm randomised controlled trial.

Participants and setting:

Community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years and older.

Interventions:

Digital 12-week strength and balance programme, plus standard care (falls prevention exercises advice and leaflet) against standard care only.

Main outcome measures:

The primary outcome measure is balance function at 12 weeks post-baseline, as assessed by the Berg Balance scale (BBS). Secondary outcomes include: healthcare utilisation and health-related quality of life, fear of falling, mobility, self-reported physical activity, falls risk, pain, mood, fatigue, and self-reported falls over a 3-month period. Randomisation will take place after participants are recruited and baseline data is collected.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

  • Eligible participants will be advised to use KOKU (a digital health wellbeing app) three times per week for 20-30 minutes
  • The KOKU intervention will run for 12 weeks to test the effectiveness
  • The control group will be given FaME/ OTAGO exercise and falls prevention information leaflets without KOKU
  • Assessments will take place at baseline, 6 weeks, and at the end of the12-week period
  • Outcome measures to be used include a series of standardised tests and questionnaires and each participant will be aided in completing these measures
  • At the end of the 12 weeks, focus groups and interviews will be conducted to assess the care managers, carers and participant's perspectives regarding the effectiveness of the KOKU digital program and its usability

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

202

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Greater Manchester
      • Manchester, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom, M13 9PL
        • University of Manchester
      • Manchester, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom, M13 9PL
        • The University of Manchester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Older adults (aged 60 years and older, inclusive of all genders and ethnicities)
  • Are able and willing to provide informed consent (to participate in the study)
  • Are able to understand and speak English (to communicate with researchers and understand what the research involves)
  • Are able to see and safely use the tablet-based program and read instructions with or without glasses as assessed by the trained research staff (in order to access the intervention)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to understand the study procedures
  • Currently using other digital technologies to exercise (would not be a true experimental or control group participant)
  • Medical contraindications to exercise e.g. acute illness, severe congestive cardiac failure, uncontrolled hypertension, recent fracture or surgery; myocardial infarction or stroke in past 6 months; severe cognitive impairment; orthopaedic surgery in last 6 months, or on waiting list to have orthopaedic surgery; wheelchair users; severe auditory or visual impairment; and peripheral neuropathy or other uncontrolled medical (conditions that are likely to compromise the ability to exercise)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: KOKU

A maximum of 196 participants will be recruited to participate in the study, across sites in Greater Manchester and Lancashire, UK.

Participants will be randomised into either;

  • the experimental group (n=98); who will receive the KOKU intervention or
  • the control group (n=98); who will receive the FaME/ OTAGO exercise and falls prevention information leaflets without KOKU.

KOKU is a digital strength and balance programme designed to prevent physical decline and frailty KOKU provides access to personalised, progressive strength and balance exercises.

More information can be found at: https://kokuhealth.com/

Other Names:
  • Keep-On-Keep-Up
Active Comparator: FaME/OTAGO

A maximum of 196 participants will be recruited to participate in the study, across sites in Greater Manchester and Lancashire, UK.

Participants will be randomised into either;

  • the experimental group (n=98); who will receive the KOKU intervention or
  • the control group (n=98); who will receive the FaME/ OTAGO exercise and falls prevention information leaflets without KOKU.

A leaflet with information on a combination of strength and balance exercises and walking programs, performed on a weekly basis by older adults at home, or community settings. The exercises can be done individually or in a group setting and are aimed at reducing falls in older adults.

More information can be found at: https://fameexercise.com/ and https://www.livestronger.org.nz/assets/Uploads/acc1162-otago-exercise-manual.pdf https://www.ageuk.org.uk/information-advice/health-wellbeing/exercise/staying-steady-download-page/#:~:text=This%20guide%20outlines%20things%20you%20can

Other Names:
  • Fitness-and-Mobility-Exercises (FaME) / OTAGO-Exercise-Program (OEP) and AGE UK Stay Steady Leafletleaflets

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Time Frame: 0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion)
The primary outcome measure is balance function as measured by the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). The BBS is a 14-item scale designed to measure balance of the older adult in a clinical setting. Each item consists of a five-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating the lowest level of function and 4 the highest level of function and takes approximately 20 minutes to complete. The total score equals 56. Score of < 45 indicates individuals may be at greater risk of falling (Berg et al., 1992).
0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ5D-5L)
Time Frame: 0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion)
The 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) measures health-related quality of life and consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient selects the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions which results in a 1-digit number for the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life. Minimum score is -0.285 and maximum score is 1.
0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion)
5-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)
Time Frame: 0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion)
Mood will be assessed using the 5-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). This screening tool for depression in older adults is validated for older adults in a wide range of settings (Hoyl et al., 1999). The scale ranges from minimum score of 0 indicating no depression to 5 indicating higher level of depressive symptoms.
0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion)
Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE)
Time Frame: 0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion)
To assess the participant's physical activity levels. The PASE score theoretically ranges from 0 indicating no physical activity to a maximum score of over 400 (depending on the intensity, frequency and duration of the activities) indicating greater levels of physical activity.
0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion)
Short Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I)
Time Frame: 0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion)
To assess confidence in performing activities of daily living without falling.(concerns about falling). The scale ranges from 7 to 28 with 7 as the minimum score indicating no concerns about falling and 28 is the maximum score indicating severe concern about falling.
0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion)
Five times Sit to Stand Test
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks
The 5-times Sit-to-Stand Test assesses lower body strength, lower limb power, and functional mobility. It measures the time in seconds taken to complete five consecutive sit-to-stand movements as quickly as possible from a seated position. There are no fixed minimum or maximum scores in time, higher scores indicate worse performance. For older adults a time greater than 12 seconds is often used as a threshold indicating an increased risk of falls or mobility limitations.
Baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks
Assessment of Falls Risk Tool (FRAT)
Time Frame: 0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion)
To assess risk of falls, 0 is the minimum score indicating no or very low risk of falls and 20 is the maximum score indicating a very high risk of falls.
0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion)
System Usability Scale (SUS)
Time Frame: 0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion)
To assess the usability of KOKU. The SUS provides a score between 0 and 100 with 0 the minimum score indicating poor usability and 100 the maximum score indicating excellent usability.
0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion)
Theoretical Framework for Acceptability (TFA)
Time Frame: 0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion)
To assess the usability of KOKU. The TFA is reported qualitatively to capture a detailed understanding of acceptability in healthcare settings.
0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion)
12 Item Short Scale for Measuring Technology Commitment
Time Frame: 0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion)
To assess the usability of KOKU. The 12 Item Short Scale for Measuring Technology Commitment follows a likert-type scale (ranging 1 to 5 for each item). The total score is then calculated by summing the items. The minimum score is 12 representing the lowest commitment to technology and the maximum score is 60 indicating highest level of commitment to technology.
0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion)
The Short Version of the User Experience Question
Time Frame: 0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion)
To assess the usability of KOKU. The Short Version of the User Experience Question (UEQ) is composed of 6 dimensions of user experience (attractiveness, efficiency, perspicuity, dependability, stimulation and novelty) rated on a 7 point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 7. The minimum score is 6 indicating low user experience and the maximum score is 42 indicating high user experience.
0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Emma Stanmore, PhD, The University of Manchester

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 24, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

June 24, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 4, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PURE ID: 273223769

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Balance

Clinical Trials on KOKU

Subscribe