Advanced Wireless Sensors for Neonatal Care in the Delivery Room (AWARD)

May 5, 2026 updated by: Guilherme Sant'Anna, MD

Advanced Wireless Sensors for Neonatal Care in the Delivery Room: the AWARD Prospective Multicenter International Study

The goals of this observational study is to assess whether a new advanced wireless skin sensor vital sign monitoring system can effectively monitor the vital signs of healthy newborn infants (≥ 35 weeks gestational age). The main aims of this Study are to:

  1. Assess feasibility
  2. Evaluate safety
  3. Determine accuracy of the wireless monitoring system, compared to the standard of care wired vital sign monitoring system, immediately after delivery and for the first 2h of age in the obstetrical center under unsupervised parents' care. The newborn infants participating in the Study will have both vital sign monitoring systems placed on their chest and limb. Their vital signs will be monitored for 2h consecutively.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

When the transition from intrauterine to extrauterine life necessitates Neonatal Resuscitation, specialized monitoring of vital signs is required. Sudden Unexpected Postnatal Collapse (SUPC) is an apnea or cardiorespiratory failure occurring in otherwise healthy near-term or term neonates, usually in the first 48 hours of age, during the initial Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) in the obstetrical center. SUPC carries a high morbidity and mortality rate. Approximately 10 million babies do not breathe immediately after birth, and 60% require basic resuscitation interventions. Sudden Unexpected Postnatal Collapse has been estimated to occur in 2.6-133 cases per 100.000 newborns and over 50% of the cases occur following accidental suffocation, which frequently goes unrecognised by parents in the obstetrical center during unsupervised KMC.

Current guidelines recommend monitoring of heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), and skin temperature (Tskin) during neonatal resuscitation. This is usually achieved by using wired electrodes and sensors that require expensive and large base units attached to a power supply. SUPC is a rare but largely preventable cause of neonatal mortality that deserves particular attention. Better resuscitation and prevention of SUPC might be achieved by continuous non-intrusive monitoring of vital signs immediately after delivery and while in the obstetrical center.

This research will address a very important gap in care; the need for safe and accurate advanced, non-invasive, and non-intrusive wireless technologies for monitoring of vital signs immediately after birth and during the immediate postnatal care, potentially preventing cases of SUPC while in the obstetrical center.

Reliable and low-cost wireless monitoring that could be used immediately after delivery would promote widespread adoption of neonatal resuscitation recommendations in low and middle income countries, improve detection of vital signs quickly after delivery and during early unsupervised KMC, and optimize neonatal care in the obstetrical centers or during hospital stay, to prevent cases of SUPC and its associated high mortality.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

600

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Paraná
      • Londrina, Paraná, Brazil, 86038-350
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hospital Universitário da Universidade Estadual de Londrina
        • Contact:
          • Adriana Zani
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H4A 3J1
        • Recruiting
        • Montreal Children's Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Guilherme Sant'Anna, MD
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Wissam Shalish, MD
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
        • Recruiting
        • Royal Victoria Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Guilherme Sant'Anna, MD, PhD
    • BI
      • Ponderano, BI, Italy, 13875
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Nuovo Ospedale Degli Infermi
        • Contact:
          • Paolo Manzoni, MD
    • Canton of Lucerne
      • Lucerne, Canton of Lucerne, Switzerland
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Lucerne Cantonal Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Urs Schumacher

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Newborns ≥35 weeks (gestational age)
  2. Newborns determined to be clinically stable at delivery
  3. Newborns with no skin abnormalities

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Newborns ≤ 35 weeks (gestational age)
  2. Newborns determined to not be clinically stable at delivery
  3. Newborns with Skin abnormalities

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Vaginal Birth
Wireless monitoring system placed first for vaginal birth. 15-20 minutes later, the wired monitoring system is placed. Both systems stay in place for 2 hours.
A standard ECG and SpO2 monitoring device will be applied suing the Infinity M540 monitor (Draeger, Germany). The chest sensor will be placed as per standard of care on the newborn's chest and abdomen, and the SpO2 sensor on their hands or feet.
Other Names:
  • Infinity M540 (Draeger)
The wireless monitoring system will be applied to the newborn and consist of a chest sensor (Anne Arc by Sibel Inc.) and a RAD-7 (Masimo)pulse oximeter limb sensor.
Other Names:
  • Anne Arc (Sibel Health Inc)
  • Radical-7 (Masimo)
Other: C-Section Birth
System placement randomized for C-section. One system placed first and the alternate placed immediately after. Both systems stay in place for 2 hours.
A standard ECG and SpO2 monitoring device will be applied suing the Infinity M540 monitor (Draeger, Germany). The chest sensor will be placed as per standard of care on the newborn's chest and abdomen, and the SpO2 sensor on their hands or feet.
Other Names:
  • Infinity M540 (Draeger)
The wireless monitoring system will be applied to the newborn and consist of a chest sensor (Anne Arc by Sibel Inc.) and a RAD-7 (Masimo)pulse oximeter limb sensor.
Other Names:
  • Anne Arc (Sibel Health Inc)
  • Radical-7 (Masimo)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of using a wireless monitoring system immediately after delivery for RR.
Time Frame: 6 months
Percentage of time for which respiratory rate (RR) is displayed.
6 months
Feasibility of using a wireless monitoring system immediately after delivery for SpO2.
Time Frame: 6 months
Percentage of time for which blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) is displayed.
6 months
Feasibility of using a wireless monitoring system immediately after delivery for Tskin
Time Frame: 6 months
Percentage of time for which skin temperature (Tskin) is displayed.
6 months
Feasibility of using a wireless monitoring system immediately after delivery - Gap occurence
Time Frame: 6 months
Occurrence of gaps in signal detection/recordings (% and length in seconds).
6 months
Feasibility of using a wireless monitoring system immediately after delivery - Gap causes
Time Frame: 6 months
Causes of the gaps in signal detection/recordings.
6 months
Feasibility of using a wireless monitoring system immediately after delivery - User satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 months
Descriptive analysis of user surveys and their satisfaction with the wireless system.
6 months
Safety of using a wireless system immediately after delivery - skin score
Time Frame: 6 months
Skin score (Neonatal Skin Condition Score) to be determined by a blinded dermatologist using de-identified pictures of the skin after removal of the sensors of each system. A "perfect" score using the NSCS is 3; the worst score is 9.
6 months
Safety of using a wireless system immediately after delivery - pain scale
Time Frame: 6 months
Pain scale (Neonatal Infant Pain Scale) to assess any discomfort or pain during the removal of the sensors, with higher scores indicating greater pain.
6 months
Assess the accuracy of this wireless system - correlation coefficient.
Time Frame: 6 months
Measuring HR, RR, SpO2 and Tskin signals compared with the "standard of care" wired system - Correlation coefficient
6 months
Assess the accuracy of this wireless system - slope
Time Frame: 6 months
Measuring HR, RR, SpO2 and Tskin signals compared with the "standard of care" wired system - Slop
6 months
Assess the accuracy of this wireless system - variance accounted for
Time Frame: 6 months
Measuring HR, RR, SpO2 and Tskin signals compared with the "standard of care" wired system - Variance accounted for
6 months
Assess the accuracy of this wireless system - bias.
Time Frame: 6 months
Measuring HR, RR, SpO2 and Tskin signals compared with the "standard of care" wired system - Bias
6 months
Feasibility of using a wireless monitoring system immediately after delivery for HR.
Time Frame: 6 months
Percentage of time for which heart rate (HR) is displayed.
6 months
Safety of using a wireless system immediately after delivery - clinical event discrepancies
Time Frame: 6 months
Clinically significant events detected by the wired system (HR < 100 bpm or SpO2 < 80%) but missed by the wireless system.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time between sensors placement and data display (seconds)
Time Frame: 6 months
To determine the time (seconds)between sensors placement and data display for each system (seconds)
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Guilherme Sant'Anna, MD, PhD, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 8, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infant, Newborn, Diseases

Clinical Trials on Wired vital sign monitoring system

Subscribe