The Effect of Task-oriented Training on Upper Extremity Motor Functions in Chronic Stroke Patients

September 16, 2025 updated by: Guzin Kaya Aytutuldu, Biruni University

The Effect of Task-oriented Training With Conventional Rehabilitation on Upper Extremity Motor Functions in Chronic Stroke Patients

The aim of our study was to investigate the effects of task-oriented training added to conventional rehabilitation on upper extremity muscle thickness and upper extremity motor functions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Stroke refers to a neurological disorder caused by cerebrovascular damage. It is defined as a sudden brain attack that causes partial or complete brain dysfunction due to blockage or rupture of blood vessels of the brain.The primary symptom of stroke is hemiparesis. In addition, stroke negatively affects senses, motor function, perception, cognition and language, depending on location, etiology and infarct volume. One study reported that %85 of stroke patients had hemiparesis and more than %69 had upper limp disfunction. In general, upper limb dysfunction not only causes problem in performing tasks that require fine motor skills (Daily tasks such as personal hygiene activities, eating and handwriting), but also makes ıt very difficult the perform tasks that require gross motor skills (such as balancing).(walking and self protection reflexes). Upper limb dysfunction reduces the quality of life (QoL) of patients with paralysis. It limits their ability to live independently in society as it impairs many of the basic IADLs (such as crawling, balancing, walking, writing, eating, washing and manipulating objects) necessary for individuals to live independently. Hands and arms are used in a wide range of tasks performed in the workplace and used to communicate.They also play an important role in various cognitive activities and motor functions. In stroke patients, the recovery of upper limb function, which is necessary to independently perform IADLs, can be considered as critical as the recovery of walking. The aim of therapeutic training in rehabilitation is to help patients try to use the affected side and voluntarily perform motor functions, and there are various physical intervention approaches.According to several recent studies conducted in stroke patients, among them, task-oriented training is reported to be effective in developing functional motor skills necessary to perform activities of daily living. Task-oriented training can help patients to increase their ability to perform IADLs. Training consists of a variety of functional activities that offer a more effective treatment approach. Task-oriented training is a therapeutic model based on the theory of motor control system, which regulates the movements of organisms by the nervous system, including reflexes. It uses a functional approach in the rehabilitation of neurological patients and teaches patients task-specific strategies to help them adapt to changing environments. The approach involves patients practicing a skill necessary to achieve the goal of a task to facilitate problem solving by improving their ability to adapt to various situations and developing an effective reward strategy. In addition, the approach for maximal learning involves motivating patients behaviorally using tasks related to their personal daily lives and emphasizes the interaction between patients and their environment. Task-focused training uses a patient-centered approach rather than a therapist-centered approach, and meaningful tasks are selected as a core component. The therapeutic goal of task-focused training is maximal recovery of motor function through proactive performance of activities using the upper limb on the affected side rather than the intact side . It was stated that repetitive and focused task-oriented training improves recovery of upper limb function and can improve motor order, dexterity and agility in the upper limb.

Lee also reported that task-oriented circuit training improved upper limb functions, performance in activities of daily living, and self-efficacy in expressing confidence.

The aim of our study was to investigate the effects of task-oriented training added to conventional rehabilitation on upper extremity muscle thickness and upper extremity motor functions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

39

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • History of cerebrovascular accident at least 6 months ago;
  • Score at least 20 points on the mini mental test;
  • Not having pain with tension or severe weakness in the shoulder muscles;
  • Active shoulder flexion movement of at least 30 degrees
  • Having a stroke for the first time
  • The level of motor function is Stage 3 or Stage 4 in Brunnstrom Staging according to the proximal function of the upper extremity
  • Not receiving botulinum toxin treatment for the last 3 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of concomitant neurological, orthopedic, cardiovascular diseases and severe comorbidities
  • Severe spasticity of the elbow flexors more than 2 on the Modified Ashworth Scale

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Task oriented Training Group

Conventional rehabilitation + Upper arm Ergometer

+ Task oriented Training

Task oriented training consists of opening the bottlecap, stacking cubes on different sizes, buttoning,screwing, wearing a coat.
Bobath weightbearing and mobility exercises for upper extremity and 15 minutes Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation.
The patients will be rode 5 minutes forwardly and 5 minutes backwardly
Active Comparator: Conventional Rehabilitation Group
Conventional rehabilitation + Upper arm Ergometer
Bobath weightbearing and mobility exercises for upper extremity and 15 minutes Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation.
The patients will be rode 5 minutes forwardly and 5 minutes backwardly

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl Meyer Upper extremity assessment
Time Frame: 5 minutes
It is a disease-specific, objective motor impairment scale designed especially for the evaluation of recovery in hemiplegic patients after stroke. It includes subsections evaluating joint movements, coordination and reflex activities related to the shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist and hand. The highest score that can be obtained from this assessment is 66. The assessment is applied to the affected upper extremities of individuals in the sitting position. The evaluated joint movements are scored as 0: no movement, 1: partial movement and 2: normal movement. Reflex activity is assessed using a reflex hammer and scored as 0: no reflex activity, 2: reflex activity can be elicited.
5 minutes
Wolf Motor Function Scale
Time Frame: 5 minutes
It is an assessment method developed to evaluate motor skills and used in patients with moderate to severe upper extremity motor deficits. The original version was developed by Wolf et al. The modified version was used in our study and the validity and internal consistency of the WMFT have been proven. The test includes 17 activities. For 15 of the 17 activities, data are collected in two areas: "Functional Skill" and 'Performance Time". The other 2 activities evaluating muscle strength were not used in our study. The duration of the test is 30-45 minutes. Each activity was scored by the physiotherapist on a 0-5 point scale (0= Never used the affected hand during the activity, 5= Normal movement) using the "Functional skill scale". An average score should be calculated for the functional skills scale. Accordingly, the patient can score between 0-5 points in this evaluation and a high score indicates good functional skills. "Performance Time" is recorded in seconds. The
5 minutes
Examination of muscle thickness by ultrasound
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Muscle thickness of the biceps, triceps and anterior deltoid muscles on the hemiplegic and intact side will be measured and recorded by ultrosound before and after treatment.
10 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Motor Activity Log-28
Time Frame: 5 minutes
MAG-28 is a structured assessment designed to examine how often and how well the person uses the affected arm outside the treatment session. The reason for choosing the 28-activity form of MAG, which can be found in many forms in the literature such as MAG-14 and MAG-30, in our study is that its validity and reliability have been proven. MAG-28 consists of two scales that question how often the patient uses the upper extremity of the affected side for each activity (Frequency of Use Scale) and how well the patient can perform the activity (Movement Quality Scale) during 28 daily activities (turning on a light switch, opening a door, etc.). The scales are printed on separate sheets of paper and remain in front of the patient being assessed throughout the administration of the test.
5 minutes
2 minutes walking test
Time Frame: 5 minutes
The test protocol will follow the guidelines recommended by Pin (24). The 2-minute walk test is repeated 2 times with a 10-minute rest between each trial to minimize fatigue in individuals. Each individual sits in a chair for 10 minutes before the 2-minute walk test. Each individual is asked to walk at their own pace without running for 2 minutes on a quiet, 10 m long concrete walkway. The start and end points of the walkway are clearly marked with brightly colored marker tape. Individuals are allowed to rest or stop at any time during the 2 minutes if necessary.
5 minutes
Grip strength
Time Frame: 3 minutes
Hand grip strength of the patients will be measured with Jamar Hand Dynamometer. The Jamar Hand Dynamometer has 5 different handles that can be adapted according to the patient's hand size . For the measurement, the patients are seated and the elbow is flexed ninety degrees, the forearm is in neutral position and the wrist is in extension between zero and thirty degrees. Measurements were taken for both sides and three measurements were taken at thirty-sixty second intervals and the average of the three measurements was recorded.
3 minutes
Functional Independence Measurements
Time Frame: 10 minutes

Defined as a comprehensive scale, the FIM assesses the functions of the individual in two main areas evaluates:

  1. Physical/motor functions (13 items)
  2. Cognitive functions (5 items) The items are a seven-level scale assessing different activities such as self-care, sphincter control, transfer, locomotion, communication and social perception. Level 1: Complete Dependence, Level 7: Complete Independence. The FIM total score is obtained by summing the scores of the 18 items. The maximum score can be 126 and the minimum score can be 18. A high total score indicates that the individual's dependence in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) decreases . Functional Independence Scale is presented in Appendix-8. All items should be evaluated and not left blank. Items are evaluated by sticking to the activities defined. For example, when questioning sphincter control, going to the toilet or sitting on the toilet is not taken into consideration.
10 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 30, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 17, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

We share it in order to contribute to future studies.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

september 30- march 30

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Stroke Patients

Clinical Trials on Task Oriented Training

Subscribe