Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Efficacy in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (REPAIR)

July 7, 2025 updated by: Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Efficacy in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: a Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled, Parallel-group Trial

Several recent large-scale clinical trials aimed at improving subarachnoid hemorrhage(SAH) outcomes have concluded with negative results, failing to enhance the prognosis for these patients. Consequently, there is an urgent demand for novel treatment strategies and approaches to address the challenges posed by SAH.

Remote ischemic conditioning(RIC) has gained considerable attention in the treatment of stroke, particularly ischemic stroke, with numerous studies demonstrating its potential to enhance neurological outcomes compared to conventional treatments alone.RIC for the treatment of SAH is an investigative strategy in its initial stages. The neuroprotective effects of RIC, particularly its potential to preserve cranial nerve function and ameliorate neurological deficits, confer significant value in the treatment of SAH patients.

The precise manner in which SAH patients may benefit from RIC treatment, and the mechanisms by which it improves neurological function, remain to be fully understood. Consequently, randomized controlled trials are necessary to validate the efficacy of RIC in this patient population and to delineate the optimal therapeutic protocols for its application.

Based on the above discussion, this study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of RIC in the treatment of SAH.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage confirmed by imaging examination (diagnosed by computed tomography and confirmation of an intracranial aneurysm by CT angiography or digital subtraction angiography);
  2. The Hunt-Hess grade is 2-3 at admission;
  3. Onset of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage ≤72 hours;
  4. The responsible aneurysm has been treated by endovascular interventional therapy;
  5. 18≤ age ≤80 years old;
  6. Informed consent must be obtained from participants or legally authorized representatives.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with other intracerebral hemorrhage or other types of subarachnoid hemorrhage;
  2. Previous neurological deficits (mRS Score ≥1) or psychiatric disorders that can confound neurological or functional assessments;
  3. With severe comorbidities and a life expectancy of less than 90 days;
  4. Refractory hypertension (Systolic blood pressure> 180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >110 mmHg);
  5. Contraindications of RIC: severe soft tissue injury of the lower limbs, etc;
  6. Concurrent participation in another protocol investigating a different experimental therapy;
  7. Any condition that the investigator believes may increase the patient's risk.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Sham group
Guideline-based therapy+Sham RIC is given twice a day with 60mmHg pressure.
Remote Ischemic Conditioning is given twice a day with 60mmHg pressure.
Experimental: RIC Group
Guideline-based therapy+RIC RIC is given twice a day with 200mmHg pressure.
Remote Ischemic Conditioning is given twice a day with 200mmHg pressure.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of mRS (0-2)
Time Frame: 90±7 days
Modified Rankin Scale, mRS; min:0, max:6; A smaller score indicates a better prognosis.
90±7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of mRS (0-1)
Time Frame: 90±7 days
Modified Rankin Scale, mRS; min:0, max:6; A smaller score indicates a better prognosis.
90±7 days
mRS Score as ordinal variable
Time Frame: 7±1 days
Modified Rankin Scale, mRS; min:0, max:6; A smaller score indicates a better prognosis.
7±1 days
mRS Score as ordinal variable
Time Frame: 30±7 days
Modified Rankin Scale, mRS; min:0, max:6; A smaller score indicates a better prognosis.
30±7 days
Cognitive function score as ordinal variable
Time Frame: 7±1 days
Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA. The total score is 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function.
7±1 days
The complete blood count
Time Frame: During hospitalization
up to 30 days
During hospitalization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified participant data and study materials will be accessible.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After publication of the main trial results, subject to legal and ethical approvals.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Approved investigators will have access to deidentified data by contacting the corresponding author.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases

Clinical Trials on Sham RIC

Subscribe