Efficacy of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Preventing Post-Stroke Depression

April 2, 2025 updated by: Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing

Efficacy of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Preventing Post-Stroke Depression: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial

Post-stroke depression (PSD) is characterized primarily by low mood and loss of interest following a stroke. It is one of the most common and serious complications of stroke, with an incidence of 11% to 41% within two years post-stroke. PSD significantly impacts stroke prognosis, not only hindering neurological recovery but also increasing clinical disability and mortality rates, thereby imposing substantial economic and psychological burdens on families and society. Therefore, preventing PSD is crucial for stroke rehabilitation.

Clinical trials have demonstrated that preventive antidepressant treatment can reduce PSD incidence and improve clinical outcomes; however, controversies remain regarding the timing, methods, and safety. Meanwhile, preventive psychological therapy faces challenges in implementation due to effectiveness, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness.

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIC) is a non-invasive, cost-effective, and non-pharmacological intervention. By modulating small molecules in the peripheral and central nervous systems through transient, periodic limb blood flow restriction and reperfusion, RIC reverses neurobiological changes and demonstrates neuroprotective potential in various neurological diseases. Recently, a study showed that RIC is safe and effective in preventing PSD; however, the sample size is small and the specific mechanisms remain unclear. Therefore, this study aims to further explore the role and mechanisms of RIC in PSD prevention.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham controlled clinical study will enroll acute ischemic stroke patients within 48 hours of symptom onset. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated (1:1) to receive either remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) or sham-RIC treatment for 14 consecutive days. The primary outcome is the incidence of post-stroke depression at day 14 post-randomization.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

240

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China, 100053
        • Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University
        • Contact:
    • Guizhou
      • Tongren, Guizhou, China, 554399
        • Tongren City People's Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Long Liao
          • Phone Number: +8615121644332
    • Hebei
      • Baoding, Hebei, China, 071030
        • Baoding People's Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Lan Hou
          • Phone Number: +8613931239934
    • Jilin
      • Jilin, Jilin, China, 132001
        • Jilin People's Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Zhifei Wang
          • Phone Number: +8618104421807
    • Shanxi
      • Jincheng, Shanxi, China, 048028
        • Jincheng People's Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Lina Xu
          • Phone Number: +8613835628289

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient age≥18 years;
  • No gender preference;
  • Diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke;
  • From onset to treatment ≤48 h;
  • 6≤ NIHSS scores ≤25;
  • Premorbid mRS ≤1;
  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Baseline HAMD-24 scores ≥8;
  • Infarction area overlapped with the area where the DTI-ALPS index is calculated;
  • A history of severe mental illness such as depression, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia;
  • A history of mental disorders caused by other organic diseases, such as post-Parkinson depression;
  • Participants with cognitive impairment, disturbance of consciousness, severe hearing impairment, or aphasia who were unable to cooperate with the assessment;
  • A history of autoimmune diseases (such as multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, systemic lupus erythematosus, etc.), malignant tumors, or obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome;
  • Intracranial tumor, arteriovenous malformation, or aneurysm;
  • Uncontrolled severe hypertension (systolic pressure >180mmHg or diastolic pressure >110 mmHg after drug treatment) ;
  • Subclavian artery stenosis≥50% or subclavian steal syndrome;
  • Any contraindication for remote ischemic adaptation: the upper limb has serious soft tissue injury, fracture or vascular injury, distal upper limb perivascular lesions, etc.;
  • Severe coagulation dysfunction, platelet count < 100×10^9/L, cardiac dysfunction (NYHA class Ⅲ or above), hepatic dysfunction (aspartate aminotransferase and/or alanine aminotransferase > 3 times the upper limit of normal), or renal dysfunction (serum creatinine > 265μmol/L);
  • Any contraindication for magnetic resonance imaging: metal implants, claustrophobia, etc.;
  • Women known to be pregnant or lactating, or have a positive pregnancy test;
  • Participating in other clinical trials within three months;
  • Participants not suitable for this clinical studies considered by researcher.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: RIC group
Subjects in the RIC group receive standard therapy and RIC treatment.
The ischemic preconditioning training device is applied to the subjects' upper arms to administer pressure (200 mmHg). The pressure is maintained for 5 minutes, followed by 5 minutes of release, completing one ischemia-reperfusion cycle. Each training session consists of 5 consecutive cycles, performed twice daily for 14 days.
Sham Comparator: Sham-RIC group
Subjects in the Sham-RIC group receive standard therapy and Sham-RIC treatment.
The ischemic preconditioning training device is applied to the subjects' upper arms to administer pressure (60 mmHg). The pressure is maintained for 5 minutes, followed by 5 minutes of release, completing one ischemia-reperfusion cycle. Each training session consists of 5 consecutive cycles, performed twice daily for 14 days.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of post-stroke depression
Time Frame: Day 14
The diagnosis of post-stroke depression is established according to the "Depressive Disorder Due to Another Medical Condition" criteria specified in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders, Research Version (SCID-5-RV).
Day 14

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cumulative incidence of post-stroke depression
Time Frame: Day 28, Day 90, and Day 180
The cumulative incidence of post-stroke depression is calculated as (number of post-stroke depression cases during follow-up / total enrolled participants) × 100%.
Day 28, Day 90, and Day 180
Incidence of post-stroke anxiety
Time Frame: Day 180
The diagnosis of post-stroke anxiety is established according to the "Anxiety Disorder Due to Another Medical Condition" criteria specified in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders, Research Version (SCID-5-RV).
Day 180
Cumulative incidence of post-stroke anxiety state
Time Frame: Day 14, Day 28, Day 90, and Day 180
Post-stroke anxiety state is defined as a 14-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA-14) score ≥7 points.
Day 14, Day 28, Day 90, and Day 180
Change from baseline in enlarged perivascular spaces (EPVS) severity score (range 0-4)
Time Frame: Day 14
EPVS in the basal ganglia (BG) and centrum semiovale (CSO) are visually scored as: 0 = none, 1 = 1-10, 2 = 11-20, 3 = 21-40, and 4 = >40 on the axial slice with the highest burden and hemicerebrum with higher burden. The higher the score, the worse the outcome.
Day 14
Change from baseline in Diffusion Tensor Imaging-Analysis along the Perivascular Space (DTI-ALPS) index.
Time Frame: Day 14
The DTI-ALPS index is calculated as the ratio of projection-to-association fiber diffusivity in the lateral ventricular region.
Day 14
Change from baseline in Neurotransmitter levels in brain regions
Time Frame: Day 14
Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (¹H-MRS) is performed to quantify the levels of N-acetylaspartate (NAA), glutamate/glutamine (Glx), choline (Cho), and creatine (Cr) in the following brain regions: thalamus, caudate nucleus, putamen, globus pallidus, amygdala, hippocampus, insular cortex, medial prefrontal cortex, and cingulate cortex.
Day 14
Change from baseline in peripheral blood neurotransmitter levels
Time Frame: Day 14
Levels of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), glutamate (Glu), glutamine (Gln), serotonin (5-HT), norepinephrine (NE), and dopamine (DA) in peripheral blood are measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).
Day 14
Change from baseline in peripheral blood cytokine levels
Time Frame: Day 14
Levels of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-10, IL-15, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interferon-γ (IFN-γ), and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) in peripheral blood are measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Day 14
Change from baseline in 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-24) score (range 0-76)
Time Frame: Day 14, Day 28, Day 90, and Day 180
The HAMD-24 is a standardized, clinician-rated instrument for quantifying depression severity, where elevated scores correlate with increased symptom burden.
Day 14, Day 28, Day 90, and Day 180
Change from baseline in 14-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA-14) score (range 0-56)
Time Frame: Day 14, Day 28, Day 90, and Day 180
The HAMA-14 is a standardized, clinician-rated instrument for quantifying anxiety severity, with higher scores indicating greater severity.
Day 14, Day 28, Day 90, and Day 180
Change from baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score (range 0-21)
Time Frame: Day 14, Day 28, Day 90, and Day 180
The PSQI is a validated self-reported questionnaire assessing sleep quality and disturbances over a 1-month period. Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality.
Day 14, Day 28, Day 90, and Day 180
Change from baseline in Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) score (range 0-226)
Time Frame: Day 14
The FMA is administered to evaluate sensorimotor recovery post-stroke. Higher total scores indicate better functional recovery.
Day 14
Change from baseline in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (range 0-42)
Time Frame: Day 14
The NIHSS is assessed to quantify neurological deficit severity. Higher scores indicate more severe impairment.
Day 14
Change from baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score (range 0-30)
Time Frame: Day 90 and Day 180
The MMSE is administered to assess global cognitive function, with lower scores indicating greater impairment.
Day 90 and Day 180
Change from baseline in EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) score (range 5-25)
Time Frame: Day 90 and Day 180
The EQ-5D-5L is administered to assess health-related quality of life. Higher scores indicate worse quality of life.
Day 90 and Day 180
Change from baseline in EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-5D-5L VAS) score (range 0-100)
Time Frame: Day 90 and Day 180
The EQ-5D-5L VAS records self-rated overall health status on a vertical scale, with higher scores indicating better perceived health.
Day 90 and Day 180
The proportion of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score 0-2
Time Frame: Day 90 and Day 180
The mRS is administered to evaluate global functional outcomes after stroke, with scores ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death). For analysis, outcomes were dichotomized as favorable (mRS 0-2) or poor (mRS 3-6).
Day 90 and Day 180
The distribution of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score (range 0-6)
Time Frame: Day 90 and Day 180
The mRS is administered to evaluate global functional outcomes after stroke, with higher scores indicating worse outcome.
Day 90 and Day 180
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: Day 180
All-cause mortality is defined as death from any cause occurring during the study period.
Day 180
Total hospitalization time
Time Frame: Day 180
Total hospitalization time is calculated by summing all inpatient days across neurology and rehabilitation departments within the follow-up period.
Day 180

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of adverse events
Time Frame: Day 14, Day 28, Day 90, and Day 180
Adverse events include dizziness, headache, palpitation, and subcutaneous ecchymosis and swelling at the intervention site.
Day 14, Day 28, Day 90, and Day 180
Incidence of serious adverse events
Time Frame: Day 14, Day 28, Day 90, and Day 180
Serious adverse events include death, life-threatening illness or injury, hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization, medical or surgical intervention required to prevent permanent injury, severe disability, or incompetence, and other serious medical events.
Day 14, Day 28, Day 90, and Day 180

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Lina Jia, Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 10, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post-stroke Depression

Clinical Trials on RIC

Subscribe