Natural Evolution of Muscle Structure and Stiffness Following Brain Lesion (Navomuss)

We propose to carry out a single center, prospective, interventional trial to assess the natural evolution of lower limb muscle structure and muscle stiffness of hemiparetic patients following brain damage. Patients will be assessed two weeks, one month, three months and six months after their brain lesion.

Secondary objectives:

To compare the muscle stiffness and structure of patients who will develop muscle overactivity to patients who won't develop muscle overactivity.

To compare the muscle structure and muscle stiffness of the spastic lower limb muscles and the non-spastic lower limb muscles in the affected limb.

To compare the muscle structure and muscle stiffness of the affected and the non-affected lower limb.

To study the relationship between impairment and function by applying a comprehensive and original method to assess all aspects from muscle structure and mechanics to patient's functional capacities.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Brussels, Belgium, 1200
        • Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female or male ≥ 18 years and ≤ 80 years at screening
  • Hemiparesis secondary to a first stroke or traumatic brain injury
  • < 1 month post-stroke/brain injury Subjects must meet all of the inclusion criteria in order to be eligible to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral limb paresis
  • Major cognitive impairments limiting the functional evaluation
  • Neurological or orthopedic affection interfering with the paretic limbs function
  • Underlying neuromuscular disease (e.g. myasthenia gravis, Lambert-Eaton syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis)
  • Contraindication to perform MRI Subjects meeting any of the exclusion criteria at baseline will be excluded from study participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Only one arm
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Shear wave elastography (SWE) Electronic oscillatory device (EOD)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Muscle elasticity
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after brain lesion
Muscle elasticity measured by shear wave elastography, expressed in m/s. A smaller shearwave velocity indicates a better outcome
2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after brain lesion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
muscle volume
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after brain lesion
muscle volume measured by magnetic resonance imaging, expressed in mm3. A greater muscle volume indicates a better outcome
2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after brain lesion
muscle fat fraction
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after brain lesion
muscle fat fraction measured by magnetic resonance imagine, expressed in % . A smaller fat fraction indicates a better outcome
2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after brain lesion

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
passive range of motion
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after brain lesion
expressed in angles °. The greater the angle, the better the outcome
2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after brain lesion
modified ashworth scale
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after brain lesion
minimum score:0; maximum score: 4. A higher score indicates a greater spasticity thus a worse outcome
2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after brain lesion
modified Tardieu scale
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after brain lesion
minimum score:0; maximum score: 4. A higher score indicates a greater spasticity thus a wourse outcome
2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after brain lesion
Fugl-meyer score (Lower extremity; motor function)
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after brain lesion
maximum score of 34. The highest the score, the better the motor function
2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after brain lesion
10 meter walk test
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after brain lesion
Expressed in seconds. A reduced time indicates a better outcome
2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after brain lesion
Timed Up And Go
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after brain lesion
Expressed in seconds. A reduced time indicates a better outcome
2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after brain lesion
Berg balance scale
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after brain lesion
maximum score of 56. The highest the score, the better the balance
2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after brain lesion
Abiloco
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after brain lesion
maximum score of 13. The highest the score, the better the outcome
2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after brain lesion
Stroke Impact Scale
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after brain lesion
maximum score of 295. The highest the score, the better the outcome
2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after brain lesion
Functional ambulation category
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after brain lesion
maximum score of 5. The highest the score, the better the outcome
2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after brain lesion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gaetan Stoquart, MD, PhD, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 2, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

December 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Traumatic Brain Injury

Clinical Trials on imaging

Subscribe