Comparing the Effectiveness of Traditional Physiotherapy Combined With Virtual Reality for Post-Stroke Patients

December 13, 2024 updated by: Muhammad Naveed Babur, Superior University
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of combining virtual reality (VR) therapy with traditional physiotherapy in post-stroke rehabilitation. Post-stroke patients often suffer from impairments in motor function, balance, and overall quality of life. While traditional physiotherapy is a widely accepted method for stroke recovery, incorporating VR technology may enhance treatment outcomes by providing an engaging, immersive environment that motivates patients to perform therapeutic movements.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study will compare the functional and quality-of-life improvements in patients undergoing traditional physiotherapy alone versus those receiving a combination of conventional physiotherapy and VR interventions. By assessing changes in motor function, trunk stability, balance, and quality of life, this research will provide valuable insights into whether VR can be an effective adjunctive tool in post-stroke rehabilitation programs.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
        • Services Hospital, Shadman 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Stroke, either ischemic or hemorrhagic
  • Participants who can ambulate independently or with minimal assistance.
  • Participants who were willing & able to adhere to the study protocol.
  • Including participants who were attending follow-up appointments & completing outcome measures.
  • Participants who were able to understand & provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Existence of additional neurological disorders (such as multiple sclerosis or Parkinson's disease) or serious medical conditions that could prevent participants from participating in the study.
  • Participants receiving rehabilitation or rigorous physical treatment in the previous three months were excluded.
  • Pregnant women or breastfeeding women.
  • Participants who refused to participate in the study or provide informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Interventional group I
Participants receive standard physiotherapy exercises aimed at improving motor function, balance, and trunk stability. These exercises include stretching, balance training, and muscle-strengthening activities.
Active Comparator: Interventional group II
Participants receive the same physiotherapy exercises as the traditional group, but with additional sessions involving virtual reality exercises. The VR component includes immersive activities that stimulate motor control, coordination, and cognitive engagement to support functional recovery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Time Frame: 12 Months

Assesses balance and stability.- *Purpose*: Assesses balance in older adults and individuals with balance disorders.

  • *Items*: 14 tasks, such as sitting, standing, reaching, and turning.
  • *Scoring*: Each task is scored on a scale of 0-4 (0 = inability to perform the task, 4 = normal performance).
  • *Total Score*: The maximum score is 56. Higher scores indicate better balance. A score below 45 indicates a higher risk of falling.
12 Months
Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS)
Time Frame: 12 Months
Measures trunk control and stability. SF-12 Health Survey: Evaluates quality of life in physical and mental health domains.The *Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS)* is a clinical tool used to assess trunk performance in individuals, particularly those with neurological impairments like stroke. It measures three key aspects: *static sitting balance, **dynamic sitting balance, and **coordination of trunk movements. The scale consists of **17 items*, with scores ranging from 0 to 23. Higher scores indicate better trunk control and stability. It helps clinicians evaluate and track improvements in trunk function over time, guiding rehabilitation interventions.
12 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 28, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Traditional Physiotherapy Group

Subscribe