Implementation of a Tumor Response Assessment Program Integrating the Shared Medical Decision Into the Organ Preservation Strategy for Rectal Cancer Patients (EVAREC)

April 8, 2025 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon

Implementation of a Tumor Response Assessment Program Integrating Shared Medical Decision Making Into the Organ Preservation Strategy for Rectal Cancer Patients: Phase III Randomized - Multicenter

The adoption of total mesorectal excision (TME) has standardized rectal cancer surgery and improved oncological outcomes. In locally advanced rectal cancer, neoadjuvant radio chemotherapy (NACRT) has further improved oncological benefit. Although these strategies result in good 5-year disease-free survival rates, they are associated with significant morbidity, in particular permanent long-term bowel, urinary and sexual dysfunction. In rectal cancer management, the main objective of organ preservation is to avoid or reduce morbidity and impact on quality of life after rectal resection, without compromising oncological outcomes.

The aim of this project is to evaluate the efficacy of a defined response monitoring program, including a shared decision process, as a strategy for assessing tumor response in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy.

This is a national, phase III, randomized, open-label, multicenter clinical trial comparing the tumor response monitoring program with shared decision-making, versus standard tumor response assessment in organ preservation strategies in rectal cancer.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

270

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient aged 18 to 80
  • Histologically proven lieberkuhnian adenocarcinoma with MSS status ;
  • Patient who has or is due to receive neoadjuvant treatment (4 to 6 courses of (m)FOLFIRINOX or FOLFOX chemotherapy + CAP 50 radiochemotherapy or CAP 50 radiochemotherapy alone);
  • BEFORE any neoadjuvant treatment:

    • Tumor classified T2T3 (on MRI)
    • N0-N1 (≤ 3 positive lymph nodes * or size ≤ 8 mm) (on MRI)
    • * positive node = node size > 5 mm minor axis and/or morphologically suspicious appearance Tumor size ≤4 cm (ON MRI)
    • No distant metastasis (M0)_ TAP scan or PET scan
    • ≤ 8 cm from anal margin (On MRI) (Clinical examination*)

      *if the clinical examination is not possible, then the source data is that of the MRI.

    • No invasion of the anal canal and/or sphincters (internal and external) (On MRI)
  • Operable patient
  • Ability to comply with the protocol and follow-up appointments (repeated assessment consultations and close follow-up if randomized to the Experimental Group);
  • Person affiliated with or benefiting from a social security scheme;
  • Free and informed consent signed by the patient.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a history of chemotherapy or pelvic irradiation (excluding neoadjuvant treatment)
  • Contraindication to pelvic MRI
  • Patients with MSI status undergoing immunotherapy
  • Other concomitant cancer or history of cancer within 5 years, with the exception of carcinoma in situ of the cervix or basal cell or squamous cell skin carcinoma or any other carcinoma in situ, considered cured
  • Women who are pregnant, likely to become pregnant, or who are breast-feeding;
  • Person under guardianship, curatorship or safeguard of justice, or person deprived of liberty.
  • Unable to undergo medical follow-up for geographical, social or psychological reasons.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental: Tumor response monitoring program with shared decision-making
three steps of tumor response evaluation (STEP 1 at 2 months, STEP 2 at 4 months, STEP 3 at 6 months after completion of neoadjuvant treatment): STEP 1: digital rectal examination, pelvic MRI, rectoscopy, TAP scan STEP 2: DRE, pelvic MRI, rectoscopy STEP 3: DRE, pelvic MRI, rectoscopy, TAP or PET scan
At each stage of the monitoring program and depending on the clinical and oncological results, the decision to preserve the rectum will be discussed with the patient according to a shared-decision program.
Every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months for the third year
Active Comparator: Control: Standard assessment of tumor response (validated in the GRECCAR 2 trial - Lancet 2017)
Every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months for the third year
Assessment at 2 months (+/- 7 days) after neoadjuvant treatment: digital rectal exam, pelvic MRI, rectoscopy, TAP scan
The decision to preserve the rectum is based on assessment at 2 months after completion of neoadjuvant treatment (standard of care since the GRECCAR2 trial).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Organ preservation rate
Time Frame: 2 years after the start of neoadjuvant treatment
An organ-preserving patient is defined as a patient who has not undergone rectal resection.
2 years after the start of neoadjuvant treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2031

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

December 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Tumor response monitoring program

Subscribe