- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06750549
Mobile Application for Patient Engagement and Physician-Directed Remote Management of Heart Failure (ENGAGE-HF)
Mobile Application for Patient Engagement and Physician-Directed Remote Management of Heart Failure: The ENGAGE-HF Study
The ENGAGE-HF mobile application tracks three key features over time: (1) heart failure health status, (2) vital signs (e.g., blood pressure, heart rate) and weight, and (3) the quality of heart failure medication therapy. Helping patients understand how these characteristics interact and change over time may improve their ability to understand and manage heart failure.
In this study, the investigators aim to evaluate whether the ENGAGE-HF mobile application, by facilitating the behavior change strategies of self-monitoring and feedback, and a clinician-facing dashboard, improves the optimization of heart failure guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMT) and quality of life.
An optional sub-study of cognitive function will invite all eligible participants enrolled in the main study to participate.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Stanford, California, United States, 94305
- Stanford Cardiovascular Clinic
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
- The Johns Hopkins Hospital
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
- U-M Frankel Cardiovascular Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of heart failure
- Last left ventricular ejection fraction within 2 years < 50% based on echocardiogram, MRI, CT, or nuclear perfusion and, if no ejection fraction documented, then clinical documentation of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
- Currently admitted with upcoming discharge or discharged from hospital within the prior 4 weeks
- At least two eligible heart failure therapies (guideline-recommended BB, RASI, MRA, or SGLT2i) not yet initiated or at < 50% of target dose at time of enrollment
Exclusion Criteria:
- Receives dialysis
- Inotropic therapy after hospitalization
- History of a prior solid organ transplant or actively listed on heart transplant waiting list
- History of left ventricular assist device implantation
- Cardiac amyloidosis
- Currently pregnant or intends to become pregnant during the study period
- Life expectancy estimated less than 6 months related to cardiac or non-cardiac comorbidities as per investigator's judgment
- Actively enrolled in hospice or comfort care
- Currently participating in an investigational device or drug study or having participated in such a study 30 days prior to screening
- Subject without a compatible smartphone
- Subject not proficient with written and spoken English
- Any other disorder or condition that, in the opinion of the investigator would pose a risk to subject safety or interfere with the study evaluation, procedures or completion
- Participant has diminished decision-making capacity
- Admitted to or planned discharge to a skilled nursing facility or rehabilitation facility (acute or subacute)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention
The ENGAGE-HF intervention is a combination of a patient-facing mobile application that is integrated with a remote blood pressure cuff and scale along with a clinician-facing dashboard.
The mobile application helps complete standard ambulatory monitoring recommended by heart failure clinicians.
Simultaneously, the application includes visualizations of that data and education for patients that is intended to promote patient engagement and patient understanding of heart failure care.
The information is then made available to treating clinicians via a PDF summary to facilitate outpatient management of the patient by the clinician.
There are also a select set of notifications triggered by the ENGAGE-HF platform that will be transmitted to the treating clinician.
|
The mobile app aids ambulatory heart failure monitoring and patient engagement through several features: Physiologic Monitoring: Daily tracking of blood pressure, weight, and heart rate using Bluetooth devices. Data is shown in graphical and tabular formats. Health Status Assessment: Biweekly KCCQ-12 surveys and dizziness questions provide scores (0-100), helping visualize therapy benefits and medication adherence, and reducing clinician inertia. Medication Checklist: Lists current medications and target doses for common heart failure therapies, encouraging adherence and optimization, with alerts for potential improvements. Education: Animated videos from heart failure experts and societies explain medications, monitoring rationale, app features, and interpretation of data. The app enhances heart failure management via consistent monitoring, assessment, medication adherence, and educational content. |
|
No Intervention: Control Group
Participants randomized to the control group will receive usual heart failure care.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Medication optimization score at 90 days
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
|
The primary outcome will be the difference in the medication optimization score at 90 days between the intervention and control group.
The MOS is a percent between 0 (least optimized) and 100 (most optimized), which represents the extent of medication optimization that needs to be performed.
Inputs for the score include medications, vital signs, and laboratory values, and thus, the score accounts for contraindications to medical therapy titration.
The score has been shown to correlate with clinical outcomes in two large randomized controlled trials.
|
From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-23)
Time Frame: Baseline and at 90 days
|
The secondary outcome will be heart failure symptoms as assessed by the difference between the intervention and the control groups in the 23-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaires (KCCQ-23) clinical summary score at 90 days. The KCCQ-23 quantifies patients' health status over the prior 2 weeks and has extensive data supporting its validity, reliability, and sensitivity to clinical change. Scores will be transformed into a 0-100 point rating, with lower scores representing worse health status. |
Baseline and at 90 days
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Kansas City Medical Optimization (KCMO) score
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
|
Kansas City Medical Optimization (KCMO) is the average total daily dose for each eligible Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) drug class divided by its target dose.
The investigators will compare this score with the primary outcome measure.
|
From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
|
|
Modified Continuous 4-Pillar Score
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
|
The Modified Continuous 4-Pillar Score (C4P) score is a continuous version of the 4P Intensification Score, where each dose escalation leads to an increase in the score rather than assigning the same points to a range of increasing GDMT doses.
For Beta Blockers, ACEI/ARBs, MRAs, and SGLT2 inhibitor, the C4P score is calculated as 2 + 2 × (% of target daily dose) for patients on therapy to a max score of 4. For ARNI therapy, the score is calculated as 4 + 2 × (% of target daily dose).
The score range is from 0 to 18.
A higher score is a better outcome.
|
From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
|
|
90 day all-cause mortality
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
|
Participant deaths
|
From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
|
|
Heart failure hospitalization
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
|
Participant hospitalization due to heart failure.
Heart failure hospitalizations will be defined as outlined by the Heart Failure Collaboratory and Academic Research Consortium
|
From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
|
|
Emergency department visits for heart failure
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
|
Participant visits to the emergency department for heart failure.
Emergency department visits will use a modified version of the criteria of the Heart Failure Collaboratory and Academic Research Consortium without the 24 hour hospital admission requirement.
|
From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
|
|
Outpatient intravenous diuresis
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
|
Participant undergoes outpatient intravenous diuresis.
|
From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
|
|
Process measures
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
|
The investigators will evaluate process measures related to use of the intervention and downstream clinical processes.
This will include patient engagement with the ENGAGE-HF mobile application and the subcomponents of engagement with respect to the different aspects of the mobile application.
|
From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
|
|
Mini-Cog Cognitive Assessment
Time Frame: At baseline
|
The Mini-Cog is a brief screening tool used to assess cognitive function, particularly memory and executive function, in study participants.
The assessment consists of two components: a three-item recall test and a clock-drawing test (CDT).
The three-item recall test evaluates short-term memory by requiring participants to remember and later recall three unrelated words.
The CDT assesses executive function and visual-spatial skills by requiring participants to draw a clock with a specified time.
|
At baseline
|
|
Memory Recall - Immediate
Time Frame: Baseline and at 90 days
|
In the Memory Recall - Immediate part of the INTACT neurocognitive assessment, participants recall and select five animal names.
Measured by the average number of correct responses (0-5) and completion time (seconds).
|
Baseline and at 90 days
|
|
Choice Reaction Time
Time Frame: Baseline and at 90 days
|
In the Choice Reaction Time part of the INTACT neurocognitive assessment, participants identify the direction of an arrow in an odd-colored block among three.
Measured by the proportion of correct responses (true/false) and average reaction time (seconds).
|
Baseline and at 90 days
|
|
Visual Paired Associates
Time Frame: Baseline and at 90 days
|
In the Visual Paired Associates part of the INTACT neurocognitive assessment, participants match image pairs after learning them.
Measured by the proportion of correct responses (true/false) and average reaction time (seconds).
|
Baseline and at 90 days
|
|
Digit Symbol Matching
Time Frame: Baseline and at 90 days
|
In the Digit Symbol Matching part of the INTACT neurocognitive assessment, participants match symbols to numbers using a reference.
Measured by the proportion of correct responses (true/false) and average reaction time (seconds).
|
Baseline and at 90 days
|
|
Spatial Memory
Time Frame: Baseline and at 90 days
|
In the Spatial Memory part of the INTACT neurocognitive assessment, participants recreate increasingly complex block designs.
Measured by the proportion of correct responses (true/false) and average reaction time (seconds).
|
Baseline and at 90 days
|
|
Memory Recall - Delayed
Time Frame: Baseline and at 90 days
|
In the Memory Recall - Delayed part of the INTACT neurocognitive assessment, participants recall the five animal names from the immediate recall test after a delay.
Measured by the average number of correct responses (0-5) and completion time (seconds).
|
Baseline and at 90 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michael Dorsch, PharmD, University of Michigan
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- HUM00240067
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Heart Failure
-
Umeå UniversityRegion NorrbottenNot yet recruitingHeart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureSweden
-
Indiana UniversityRecruitingCongestive Heart Failure | Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) | Congestive Heart Failure Chronic | Congestive Heart Failure(CHF)United States
-
University of Health Sciences LahoreRecruitingAcute Decompensated Heart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, SystolicPakistan
-
Tufts Medical CenterMetro West Medical CenterCompletedCongestive Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureUnited States
-
Manipal UniversityUnknownHeart Failure | Decompensated Heart Failure | Acute Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureIndia
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure NYHA Class II | Heart Failure NYHA Class III | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure NYHA Class IV | Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure...United States, Canada
-
Lakeland Regional Health Systems, Inc.RecruitingHeart Failure | Heart Failure Acute | Acute Heart Failure (AHF) | Heart Failure - NYHA II - IVUnited States
-
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care SystemNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure,Congestive | Heart Failure AcuteUnited States
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyNot yet recruitingHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, SystolicUnited States, Japan
-
Wake Forest UniversityCompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Clinical Trials on ENGAGE-HF Mobile Application
-
Healthcare Innovation Technology LabBayerUnknown
-
Marta MarciniakRecruiting
-
Mississippi State UniversityCompleted
-
Mississippi State UniversityAssociation for contextual behavioral scienceCompletedHealth-Related BehaviorUnited States
-
George Washington UniversityMedia RezCompleted
-
University of ReginaCompletedStress | Dementia | Caregiver BurdenCanada
-
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical CenterCompleted
-
Seda ÇETİN AVCIActive, not recruiting
-
University of CadizCompleted
-
Boston Medical CenterBoston Medical Center Food KitchenWithdrawnDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | Pre DiabetesUnited States