Mobile Application for Patient Engagement and Physician-Directed Remote Management of Heart Failure (ENGAGE-HF)

May 19, 2026 updated by: Michael Dorsch, University of Michigan

Mobile Application for Patient Engagement and Physician-Directed Remote Management of Heart Failure: The ENGAGE-HF Study

The ENGAGE-HF mobile application tracks three key features over time: (1) heart failure health status, (2) vital signs (e.g., blood pressure, heart rate) and weight, and (3) the quality of heart failure medication therapy. Helping patients understand how these characteristics interact and change over time may improve their ability to understand and manage heart failure.

In this study, the investigators aim to evaluate whether the ENGAGE-HF mobile application, by facilitating the behavior change strategies of self-monitoring and feedback, and a clinician-facing dashboard, improves the optimization of heart failure guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMT) and quality of life.

An optional sub-study of cognitive function will invite all eligible participants enrolled in the main study to participate.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

134

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford Cardiovascular Clinic
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • The Johns Hopkins Hospital
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • U-M Frankel Cardiovascular Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of heart failure
  • Last left ventricular ejection fraction within 2 years < 50% based on echocardiogram, MRI, CT, or nuclear perfusion and, if no ejection fraction documented, then clinical documentation of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
  • Currently admitted with upcoming discharge or discharged from hospital within the prior 4 weeks
  • At least two eligible heart failure therapies (guideline-recommended BB, RASI, MRA, or SGLT2i) not yet initiated or at < 50% of target dose at time of enrollment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Receives dialysis
  • Inotropic therapy after hospitalization
  • History of a prior solid organ transplant or actively listed on heart transplant waiting list
  • History of left ventricular assist device implantation
  • Cardiac amyloidosis
  • Currently pregnant or intends to become pregnant during the study period
  • Life expectancy estimated less than 6 months related to cardiac or non-cardiac comorbidities as per investigator's judgment
  • Actively enrolled in hospice or comfort care
  • Currently participating in an investigational device or drug study or having participated in such a study 30 days prior to screening
  • Subject without a compatible smartphone
  • Subject not proficient with written and spoken English
  • Any other disorder or condition that, in the opinion of the investigator would pose a risk to subject safety or interfere with the study evaluation, procedures or completion
  • Participant has diminished decision-making capacity
  • Admitted to or planned discharge to a skilled nursing facility or rehabilitation facility (acute or subacute)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
The ENGAGE-HF intervention is a combination of a patient-facing mobile application that is integrated with a remote blood pressure cuff and scale along with a clinician-facing dashboard. The mobile application helps complete standard ambulatory monitoring recommended by heart failure clinicians. Simultaneously, the application includes visualizations of that data and education for patients that is intended to promote patient engagement and patient understanding of heart failure care. The information is then made available to treating clinicians via a PDF summary to facilitate outpatient management of the patient by the clinician. There are also a select set of notifications triggered by the ENGAGE-HF platform that will be transmitted to the treating clinician.

The mobile app aids ambulatory heart failure monitoring and patient engagement through several features:

Physiologic Monitoring: Daily tracking of blood pressure, weight, and heart rate using Bluetooth devices. Data is shown in graphical and tabular formats.

Health Status Assessment: Biweekly KCCQ-12 surveys and dizziness questions provide scores (0-100), helping visualize therapy benefits and medication adherence, and reducing clinician inertia.

Medication Checklist: Lists current medications and target doses for common heart failure therapies, encouraging adherence and optimization, with alerts for potential improvements.

Education: Animated videos from heart failure experts and societies explain medications, monitoring rationale, app features, and interpretation of data.

The app enhances heart failure management via consistent monitoring, assessment, medication adherence, and educational content.

No Intervention: Control Group
Participants randomized to the control group will receive usual heart failure care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Medication optimization score at 90 days
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
The primary outcome will be the difference in the medication optimization score at 90 days between the intervention and control group. The MOS is a percent between 0 (least optimized) and 100 (most optimized), which represents the extent of medication optimization that needs to be performed. Inputs for the score include medications, vital signs, and laboratory values, and thus, the score accounts for contraindications to medical therapy titration. The score has been shown to correlate with clinical outcomes in two large randomized controlled trials.
From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-23)
Time Frame: Baseline and at 90 days

The secondary outcome will be heart failure symptoms as assessed by the difference between the intervention and the control groups in the 23-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaires (KCCQ-23) clinical summary score at 90 days.

The KCCQ-23 quantifies patients' health status over the prior 2 weeks and has extensive data supporting its validity, reliability, and sensitivity to clinical change. Scores will be transformed into a 0-100 point rating, with lower scores representing worse health status.

Baseline and at 90 days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Kansas City Medical Optimization (KCMO) score
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
Kansas City Medical Optimization (KCMO) is the average total daily dose for each eligible Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) drug class divided by its target dose. The investigators will compare this score with the primary outcome measure.
From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
Modified Continuous 4-Pillar Score
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
The Modified Continuous 4-Pillar Score (C4P) score is a continuous version of the 4P Intensification Score, where each dose escalation leads to an increase in the score rather than assigning the same points to a range of increasing GDMT doses. For Beta Blockers, ACEI/ARBs, MRAs, and SGLT2 inhibitor, the C4P score is calculated as 2 + 2 × (% of target daily dose) for patients on therapy to a max score of 4. For ARNI therapy, the score is calculated as 4 + 2 × (% of target daily dose). The score range is from 0 to 18. A higher score is a better outcome.
From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
90 day all-cause mortality
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
Participant deaths
From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
Heart failure hospitalization
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
Participant hospitalization due to heart failure. Heart failure hospitalizations will be defined as outlined by the Heart Failure Collaboratory and Academic Research Consortium
From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
Emergency department visits for heart failure
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
Participant visits to the emergency department for heart failure. Emergency department visits will use a modified version of the criteria of the Heart Failure Collaboratory and Academic Research Consortium without the 24 hour hospital admission requirement.
From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
Outpatient intravenous diuresis
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
Participant undergoes outpatient intravenous diuresis.
From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
Process measures
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
The investigators will evaluate process measures related to use of the intervention and downstream clinical processes. This will include patient engagement with the ENGAGE-HF mobile application and the subcomponents of engagement with respect to the different aspects of the mobile application.
From enrollment to the end of participation at 90 days
Mini-Cog Cognitive Assessment
Time Frame: At baseline
The Mini-Cog is a brief screening tool used to assess cognitive function, particularly memory and executive function, in study participants. The assessment consists of two components: a three-item recall test and a clock-drawing test (CDT). The three-item recall test evaluates short-term memory by requiring participants to remember and later recall three unrelated words. The CDT assesses executive function and visual-spatial skills by requiring participants to draw a clock with a specified time.
At baseline
Memory Recall - Immediate
Time Frame: Baseline and at 90 days
In the Memory Recall - Immediate part of the INTACT neurocognitive assessment, participants recall and select five animal names. Measured by the average number of correct responses (0-5) and completion time (seconds).
Baseline and at 90 days
Choice Reaction Time
Time Frame: Baseline and at 90 days
In the Choice Reaction Time part of the INTACT neurocognitive assessment, participants identify the direction of an arrow in an odd-colored block among three. Measured by the proportion of correct responses (true/false) and average reaction time (seconds).
Baseline and at 90 days
Visual Paired Associates
Time Frame: Baseline and at 90 days
In the Visual Paired Associates part of the INTACT neurocognitive assessment, participants match image pairs after learning them. Measured by the proportion of correct responses (true/false) and average reaction time (seconds).
Baseline and at 90 days
Digit Symbol Matching
Time Frame: Baseline and at 90 days
In the Digit Symbol Matching part of the INTACT neurocognitive assessment, participants match symbols to numbers using a reference. Measured by the proportion of correct responses (true/false) and average reaction time (seconds).
Baseline and at 90 days
Spatial Memory
Time Frame: Baseline and at 90 days
In the Spatial Memory part of the INTACT neurocognitive assessment, participants recreate increasingly complex block designs. Measured by the proportion of correct responses (true/false) and average reaction time (seconds).
Baseline and at 90 days
Memory Recall - Delayed
Time Frame: Baseline and at 90 days
In the Memory Recall - Delayed part of the INTACT neurocognitive assessment, participants recall the five animal names from the immediate recall test after a delay. Measured by the average number of correct responses (0-5) and completion time (seconds).
Baseline and at 90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Dorsch, PharmD, University of Michigan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 18, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 11, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

December 27, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HUM00240067

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on ENGAGE-HF Mobile Application

Subscribe