HoLEP vs BipolEP in Management of BPH Patients With Large Prostates

July 21, 2025 updated by: Mostafa Mohamed Atef Abdelaziz Mostafa, Assiut University

Holmium Laser Versus Bipolar Enucleation of the Prostate in Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients With Large Prostates: A Non-inferiority Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

This is a non-inferiority prospective randomized comparative clinical trial aiming to prove the non-inferiority of bipolar enucleation of the prostate in comparison to holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in management of benign prostatic hyperplasia patients with large prostates and in turn its feasibility as an alternative procedure in hospitals with limited resources

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a prevalent condition among older men. It is characterized by non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate gland often leading to urinary obstruction and significant morbidity. In case of failure of medical treatment, surgical intervention is often required especially in patients with larger prostates. Surgical options in such cases include Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) and Bipolar Enucleation of the Prostate (BipolEP). These modalities have emerged as promising relatively minimally invasive treatment options in patients with large prostates. HoLEP, utilizing laser technology to enucleate prostatic tissue, has been associated with reduced intraoperative blood loss, shorter catheterization time, and quicker recovery in comparison to open prostatectomy. Likewise, BipolEP, utilizing bipolar energy for enucleation, offers the advantage of reduced bleeding and shorter operative time. Both HoLEP and BipolEP have demonstrated efficacy in improving lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and alleviating obstruction in BPH patients with large prostates, but the comparative efficacy and safety of both techniques remains highly debated. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of these two surgical modalities aiming to provide valuable insights that can enhance clinical decision-making and patient care in BPH management.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

98

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Assiut, Egypt
        • Recruiting
        • Assiut University Urology Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >50 years
  • Prostate volume >80 ml
  • Failure of or noncompliance with medical treatment
  • IPSS >15
  • Qmax <15 ml/sec
  • Urinary retention and fixed catheters with poor results on trial of voiding without catheter

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with active UTI
  • Prostate cancer
  • Bladder carcinoma
  • Urethral stricture
  • Neurogenic bladder disorders
  • Redo cases

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP)
Half of the BPH patients with large prostate admitted to the study will undergo Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP)
Enucleation of the prostate gland using holmium laser energy
Active Comparator: Bipolar Enucleation of the Prostate (BipolEP)
Half of the BPH patients with large prostate admitted to the study will undergo Bipolar Enucleation of the Prostate (BipolEP)
Enucleation of the prostate gland using bipolar energy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in peak flow rate
Time Frame: At 6 months after the procedure (HoLEP or BipolEP)
Treatment efficacy will be evaluated by comparing the change in peak flow rate (Qmax) on uroflowmetry between the two groups
At 6 months after the procedure (HoLEP or BipolEP)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complications
Time Frame: At 6 months after the procedure (HoLEP or BipolEP)
Treatment safety will be evaluated by collecting and analyzing any reported complication within the first 6 postoperative months. Complications will be reported using the modified Clavien-Dindo classification system.
At 6 months after the procedure (HoLEP or BipolEP)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mostafa M. Mostafa, M.D., Assiut University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 30, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 6, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be made available to protect privacy of patients

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Clinical Trials on Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate

Subscribe