Digital Self-Management and Peer Mentoring Intervention

April 7, 2026 updated by: Katie Devine, PhD, MPH, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Digital Self-Management and Peer Mentoring Intervention to Improve the Transition From Pediatric to Adult Health Care for Childhood Cancer Survivors

This study tests how helpful a digital self-management and peer mentoring program is to young adult survivors of childhood cancer to improve their ability to manage their survivorship care as they transition from pediatric to adult-oriented follow-up care. Survivors require lifelong "risk-based" follow-up care based on the treatment they received to identify and treat late health effects. The transition from pediatric to adult follow-up care is a critical period when many survivors are lost to follow-up. Barriers to successful transition and engagement in care include poor knowledge of cancer history, low healthcare self-efficacy, poor self-management skills, low health literacy, and access issues such as financial hardship, insurance, and distance from cancer center. The "Managing Your Health" digital self-management and peer mentoring program aims to address these gaps and improve survivorship care self-management. Improvements in healthcare self-management are necessary to keep young adult survivors engaged in recommended health care, improve their quality of life, and promote optimal health.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of the study is to determine the efficacy of the Managing Your Health intervention to improve self-management of survivorship care among young adult survivors of childhood cancer.

Aim 1: Evaluate the efficacy of the Managing Your Health intervention. Aim 2: Determine the mechanisms through which Managing Your Health influences outcomes.

Aim 3: Identify subgroups of participants for which treatment effects vary to inform future scale up.

Managing Your Health will be tested in a two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the intervention versus usual care + educational control with 300 young adult survivors of childhood cancer currently aged 18-25 years. Participants will complete outcome measures at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months post-randomization.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 900339239
        • University of South California
    • New Jersey
      • New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 089011914
        • Rutgers Cancer Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis with any malignant childhood cancer between the ages 0-19 at least 5 years prior
  2. Cancer treatment occurred at a pediatric center/facility
  3. Current age 18-25
  4. At least 2 years from treatment completion (typical time for transfer to long-term follow-up care)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any documented physical or self-reported cognitive delay that could prevent self-management of health care
  2. Diagnoses of cancer not typically considered pediatric (I.e., melanoma, carcinoma of the breast, colorectum, lung, ovary, and testicle)
  3. Unable to speak/read English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Managing Your Health (MYH)
The Managing Your Health app + Peer Mentoring Intervention
The Managing Your Health intervention consists of six weekly videoconference calls with a peer mentor and five self-management educational modules within a mobile application. The first call is to get to know each other, share survivorship stories, identify self-management strengths and weaknesses, and select goals for participation in the intervention. The remaining five weekly calls cover a self-management topic each week, including understanding your survivorship care plan, navigating the healthcare system and insurance, managing the emotional aspects of survivorship, negotiating family and significant other involvement in care, and engaging in healthy lifestyle behaviors.
Active Comparator: Usual Care + Educational Control
The Usual Care + Educational Control
The Usual Care + Educational Control group will receive weekly emails with links to the Health Links developed by the Children's Oncology Group for use in survivorship care. Access to these Health Links reflects the current state of clinical care available to survivors. These Health Links were developed as patient education materials to cover relevant self-management and survivorship care topics. The weekly messages will align with the content of the modules from Managing Your Health to provide similar information, including Introduction to Long-Term Follow-Up (Module 1), Finding and Paying for Healthcare (Module 2), Emotional Issues (Modules 3 and 4), Educational Issues, Diet and Physical Activity, Skin Health, Reducing the Risk of Second Cancers, and Male/Female Health Issues (Module 5).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-Management behaviors
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months
The Self-Management Skills scale is a 15-item measure about a patient's active behaviors in managing their health. Response options were modified such that participants respond on a 5-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (completely) regarding their agreement to each item. Example items include "I participate in making decisions about my health" and "I book my own doctor's appointments." A total mean score will be used, which could range from 0 to 5. Higher scores indicate better self-management behaviors.
Baseline, 3 months, 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence to guideline-concordant survivorship care
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months
Participants will report on cancer-specific and general medical appointments, surveillance tests, cancer screenings, and detection of new comorbidities using items from the Follow-Up Care Use Among Survivors (FOCUS) survey developed by NCI and items from surveys in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Given the purposeful heterogeneity of our sample, we focus on the most common surveillance recommendations. We will report separately on receipt of cancer-related follow-up care (yes/no) and survivorship care plan (yes/no). For other tests, participants will be deemed adherent if they are up-to-date on recommended tests based on their health history. A summary score will be calculated for each participant by dividing the total number of recommendations completed by the total number of guideline-recommended tests. Thus, each participant will have a score that could range from 0 to 1, with 0 indicating no engagement in care and 1 indicating fully adherent to guideline concordant care.
Baseline, 12 months
Health-related Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months
The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health measure is a 10-item measure that assesses self-rated health, physical quality of life, mental quality of life, fatigue, pain, and participation in social activities and roles. The PROMIS measures have undergone extensive testing and are widely used. The Global Health measure yields a Physical Summary and Mental Health Summary scores, in addition to the total score. We will use the total score, which is standardized as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Baseline, 3 months, 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Kristine Levonyan-Radloff, MS, Rutgers Cancer Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 4, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 2, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Pro2023000838
  • R01CA282147 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The proposed research will collect self-reported and medical-record data from 300 AYA survivors of childhood cancer. The final dataset will include self-reported demographic, psychosocial, and behavioral data from surveys as well as records of healthcare utilization. Documentation of the variables included in the dataset will be provided with the dataset.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 1 year after publication with no end date

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Even with removal of all identifiers, we believe there remains a very small possibility of identifying subjects with unusual characteristics. Therefore, we will make de-identified data available to qualified individuals within the scientific community for research purposes under a data-sharing agreement that specifies that data will only be used for research purposes, transfer of data will be done through secure methods, and investigators will commit to destroying copies of the data after analyses are completed.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on Managing Your Health (MYH)

Subscribe