Music, Social Attention, and Dementia

December 1, 2025 updated by: University of California, San Francisco

The Impact of a Caregiver-patient Music Intervention on Social Attention and Connectedness in Persons Living With bvFTD and AD

This is an exploratory mixed-methods control-treatment study to evaluate if participation in rhythmic musical activities improves social attention and connectedness in individuals living with mild to moderate bvFTD and AD, and their caregivers. Secondary objectives include evaluating the potential relationships between brain networks associated with rhythm production, social attention, and connectedness in these populations.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The proposed research will evaluate potential relationships between synchronous rhythm production, social attention, and connectedness in persons living with mild to moderate bvFTD and AD and their caregivers. To evaluate these relationships, the proposed research will include data collection and analysis of the following: 1) pre-post evaluation of social attention and connectedness in individuals living with dementia and their caregivers; 2) control-treatment participation in a synchronous (treatment) or solo (control) rhythm production activity; and 3) secondary analysis of structural and functional MRI of resting state network connectivity between networks of the brain including areas associated with rhythm perception and production, namely the fronto-parietal, executive control, sensorimotor, dorsal and ventral attention networks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94158
        • Sandler Neurosciences Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion (patients)

  • Male or female ≥ 55 years of age living with bvFTD; or ≥ 70 years of age living with AD.
  • Documentation of a bvFTD or AD diagnosis as evidenced by one or more known clinical features.
  • Written informed consent obtained from subject.

Inclusion (caregivers)

  • Male or female ≥ 55 years of age living without diagnosis of neurological or psychiatric disease.
  • Individual capable of independent execution of activities of daily living, including personal care and hygiene, dressing, eating, use of a toilet, and mobility.
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion (patients)

  • Presence of a condition or abnormality that in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the data.
  • community-dwelling individuals not living with bvFTD

    • community-dwelling individuals with normal cognitive functioning
    • Individuals living with Alzheimer's disease or related dementias (primary progressive aphasia, semantic variant FTD, Lewy body dementia, vascular dementia, Parkinson's disease, or mixed dementia)
  • Individuals with a score of 2 or higher on the CDR
  • Individuals with a history of neuropsychiatric illness that would interfere with performance (e.g., transient psych hx of depression okay, hx of schizophrenia will be excluded) or medicated depression to control symptoms.
  • Individuals with unstable (e.g., cancer other than basal cell skin) or chronic (e.g., severe diabetes) medical conditions
  • Individuals with MRI contraindications (e.g., pregnancy, claustrophobia, metal implants that are contraindicated for MRI)
  • Individuals with physical impairment(s) precluding motor response
  • Individuals with inability to walk two blocks without stopping
  • Individuals with hearing or vision deficits that will not allow for completion of testing; inability to hear conversation conducted at an average volume (~60 dB)
  • Individuals who practice music making or production for at least 30-mins per week

    • This may include instrumental or vocal, writing or arranging, alone or in groups
    • Listening to music for more than 30-mins weekly will not exclude the individual from the study

Exclusion (Caregivers)

  • Presence of a condition or abnormality that in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the data.
  • Community-dwelling individuals living with diagnosis of a neurological or psychiatric disease

    o Community-dwelling individuals with abnormal cognitive functioning

  • Individuals living with dementia
  • Individuals with a history of neuropsychiatric illness that would interfere with performance (e.g., transient psych hx of depression okay, hx of schizophrenia will be excluded) or medicated depression to control symptoms
  • Individuals with unstable (e.g., cancer other than basal cell carcinoma) or chronic (e.g., severe diabetes) medical conditions
  • Individuals with physical impairment(s) precluding motor control
  • Individuals with inability to walk two blocks without stopping
  • Individuals with hearing or vision deficits that will not allow for completion of testing; inability to hear conversation conducted at an average volume (~60 dB)
  • Individuals who practice music making or production for at least 30-mins per week

    • This may include instrumental or vocal, writing or arranging, alone or in groups
    • Listening to music for more than 30-mins weekly will not exclude the individual from the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Solo Rhythm Production
Participants randomized to the control condition will complete the same rhythm conditions to the same recorded audio tracks described in the experimental condition. However, they will not interchange their tapping with their caregiver. They will participate in the rhythm task as a solo producer.
Participants randomized to the control condition will complete the same rhythm conditions to the same recorded audio tracks described in the experimental condition. However, they will not interchange their tapping with their caregiver. They will participate in the rhythm task as a solo producer.
Experimental: Synchronous Rhythm Production
The treatment group will take part in a dyad-based musical rhythm production activity facilitated by a trained musician. This activity will involve two rhythm conditions. The first condition requires tapping along to one pre-recorded audio track composed of an ensemble of Brazilian percussion instruments. The second condition requires tapping along with prerecorded audio tracks of rhythms progressively increasing in difficulty. Participants who indicate proficiency in learning to tap along in both conditions will be able to progress to more complex rhythms. All tapping data will be gathered through a Roland digital hand percussion controller.
The treatment group will take part in a dyad-based musical rhythm production activity facilitated by a trained musician. This activity will involve two rhythm conditions. The first condition requires tapping along to one pre-recorded audio track composed of an ensemble of Brazilian percussion instruments. The second condition requires tapping along with prerecorded audio tracks of rhythms progressively increasing in difficulty. Participants who indicate proficiency in learning to tap along in both conditions will be able to progress to more complex rhythms. All tapping data will be gathered through a Roland digital hand percussion controller.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Social Attention (TASIT)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2-weeks
Dependent Variable. Change in social attention will be measured by the TASIT, a 16-item instrument that measures social attention from the care recipient perspective. Items are sectioned by emotion recognition, social inference minimum (sarcasm) or enriched (lies) and assessed using standardized yes-no questions at the end of each section based on four types: think, feel, say, or do.
Baseline, 2-weeks
Degree of rhythmic synchronization between dyad-pairs as determined by autocorrelated inter-tap intervals
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of one year
Independent variable. Degree of rhythmic synchronization will be measured via a musical instrument, digital interface (MIDI) and assessed using an automated data analysis tool created explicitly for the purposes of this study.
Through study completion, an average of one year
Caregiver perceived connectedness questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 2-weeks
A 1-item, 1-7 Likert based scale (1 = very disconnected ... 7 = very connected)
Baseline, 2-weeks
Mutuality Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 2-weeks
A 15-item instrument using a 0-4 Likert (0 = not at all … 4 = a great deal) that measures mutuality from the caregiver perspective. Examples include "How close do you feel to the person you care for?" or "How much do you confide in the person you care for?"
Baseline, 2-weeks
Zarit burden
Time Frame: Baseline, 2-weeks
A 12-item instrument using a 0-4 Likert (0 = never … 4 = nearly always) that measures burden from the caregiver perspective. An example is "Do you feel that your social life has suffered because you are caring for your relative?"
Baseline, 2-weeks
Positive and Negative Experience
Time Frame: Baseline, 2-weeks
A 12-item instrument using a 1-5 Likert (1 = very rarely or never … 5 = very often or always) that measures an overall affect score that can also be divided into positive and negative feelings. It measures how the participant has felt over the past 4-weeks.
Baseline, 2-weeks
Positive Aspects of Caregiving
Time Frame: Baseline, 2-weeks
A 9-item instrument using a 1-5 Likert (1 = disagree a lot … 5 = agree a lot) that measures a caregiver's perceptions of their positive experiences in caregiving for their care recipient. An example is "Providing help to [enter name of care recipient] has made me feel more useful."
Baseline, 2-weeks
Trait Empathy (Interpersonal Reactivity Index)
Time Frame: Baseline
A 28-item instrument using an A-E Likert (A = does not describe me well … E = describes me very well) that measures participants' trait empathic disposition. Four dimensions of trait empathy are used: fantasy scale, empathic concert, perspective taking, and personal distress.
Baseline
Patient Health
Time Frame: Baseline, 2-weeks
A 2-item instrument using a 0-3 Likert (0 = not at all … 3 = nearly every day) that measures participants' perceived depression over the last 2-weeks.
Baseline, 2-weeks
Revised Self-Monitoring
Time Frame: Baseline, 2-weeks
A 13-item instrument using a 1-5 Likert (1 = … 5 = ) to measure socioemotional sensitivity and responsiveness to the behavioral expressions of others. An example is "In conversations, the subject is sensitive to even the slightest change in the facial expression of the other person he/she is conversing with."
Baseline, 2-weeks
Self-Compassion
Time Frame: Baseline, 2-weeks
A 12-item instrument using a 1-5 Likert (1 = almost never … 5 = almost always) to measure an individual's self-compassion. An example is "When I fail at something important to me I become consumed by feelings of inadequacy."
Baseline, 2-weeks
Inclusion of Self in Other
Time Frame: Baseline, 2-weeks
A 7-item instrument using concentric circles (1 = no overlap … 7 = most overlap) to measure an individual's perceived relationship between self to other.
Baseline, 2-weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient resting state functional connectivity (RSFC)
Time Frame: From date of completion of collection of all primary outcome measures, assessed up to 24 months
Pre-gathered RSFC will be used in mixed models to determine its predictive potential on rhythm production, social attention, and connectedness.
From date of completion of collection of all primary outcome measures, assessed up to 24 months
Perceptions of relationship quality between participants as determined by word frequency analysis of semi-structured interview data
Time Frame: From date of completion of collection of all primary outcome measures, assessed up to 24 months
Semi-structured interviews between participants of the dyad-pair will be analyzed using qualitative data analysis software for word frequencies of subjective and objective perceptions of their relationship with one another.
From date of completion of collection of all primary outcome measures, assessed up to 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aaron Colverson, PhD, University of California, San Francisco

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 10, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 10, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 3, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer Disease

Clinical Trials on Solo Rhythm Production

Subscribe