High Versus Low Pneumoperitoneum PressUre for Parenchymal Transection in Minimally Invasive Major Liver Surgery (PPULS)

January 7, 2025 updated by: Arianeb Mehrabi, MD, University Hospital Heidelberg

High Versus Low Pneumoperitoneum PressUre for Parenchymal Transection in Minimally Invasive Major Liver Surgery - a Non-inferiority, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial

Minimally invasive techniques in liver surgery gain popularity as they facilitate postoperative recovery while achieving comparable oncologic outcomes to the open approach. No consensus on the application of pneumoperitoneum pressure in minimal invasive liver resections (MILR) has been reached yet, as prospective clinical studies are scarce. The positive pressure of the CO2 pneumoperitoneum reduces intraoperative blood loss during MILR alongside the development of new transection devices and advancements in inflow control. Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum on the other hand has been shown to decrease postoperative pain scores and analgesic consumption in comparison to standard pneumoperitoneum, and international guidelines recommend the application of "the lowest intra-abdominal pressure allowing adequate exposure of the operative field rather than a routine pressure". Nevertheless, evidence for the application of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum is only moderate to low, requiring additional studies to better define its safety. To address this oxymoron, the investigators conduct a randomized non-inferiority trial to investigate the effect of low in comparison to high-pressure pneumoperitoneum during the transection phase of major MILR on intraoperative blood loss while also evaluating the risk of embolic complications.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

132

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age equal or older than 18 years and
  • capacity of consent and
  • planned elective conventional laparoscopic or da Vinci-assisted major liver resection or resections near the liver hilum or the hepatic venous vasculature. Major liver resections are defined as the resection of 3 liver segments or more (right and left partial hepatectomies, extended right and left hepatectomies, liver resections of 3 or more segments). Right posterior sectionectomies and mesohepatectomies of ≥2 liver segments are considered resections in proximity to the liver hilum or hepatic venous vasculature.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • the participation in another trial with interference of intervention and outcome of this study,
  • being a woman who is pregnant or breast-feeding or planning to become pregnant,
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (AS) score >3,
  • language barrier,
  • any contraindication to a minimal invasive surgical approach or intolerance to pneumoperitoneum
  • a patent foramen ovale (PFO) or any other structural cardiac defect that facilitates paradoxical gas embolisms,
  • diagnosis of neuromuscular disease, heart failure NYHA > class II or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
  • being on oral anticoagulation therapy other than Aspirin 100mg daily or any other condition known to increase the risk of bleeding.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: High Pressure Pneumoperitoneum
Intraperitoneal insufflation pressures (IIP) during the parenchymal transection phase of liver resection will be different between the two study groups. Baseline IIP of the surgical procedure will be ≤10 mmHg. IIP will be elevated to ≥14 mmHg in the intervention group during the parenchymal transection phase of liver resection.
The objective of this trial is to determine whether the maintenance of a low intraperitoneal insufflation pressure (IIP) of ≤10 mmHg during the parenchymal transection phase of conventional and robotic-assisted laparoscopic liver resection is non-inferior to a higher IIP of ≥14 mmHg in terms of intraoperative blood loss, gas embolisms, perioperative morbidity, and mortality.
Sham Comparator: Low Pressure Pneumoperitoneum
Intraperitoneal insufflation pressures (IIP) during the parenchymal transection phase of liver resection will be different between the two study groups. Baseline IIP of the surgical procedure will be ≤10 mmHg. IIP will be maintained at ≤10 mmHg in the control group.
The objective of this trial is to determine whether the maintenance of a low intraperitoneal insufflation pressure (IIP) of ≤10 mmHg during the parenchymal transection phase of conventional and robotic-assisted laparoscopic liver resection is non-inferior to a higher IIP of ≥14 mmHg in terms of intraoperative blood loss, gas embolisms, perioperative morbidity, and mortality.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Intraoperative blood loss
Time Frame: From the time of randomization until the completion of the liver surgery, assessed up to 24 hours.
From the time of randomization until the completion of the liver surgery, assessed up to 24 hours.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of CO2 embolisms
Time Frame: intraoperative
Incidence of CO2 embolisms in the right atrioventricular system detected by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography
intraoperative
Morbidity rate
Time Frame: 90 days postoperative
Postoperative complication rate
90 days postoperative
Mortality rate
Time Frame: 90 days postoperative
Postoperative mortality
90 days postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 30, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Upon reasonable request, the data generated by the current research that supports our future article, would be made available as soon as possible, wherever legally and ethically possible.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Surgery

Clinical Trials on High Pressure Pneumoperitoneum

Subscribe