Association Between Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement and Long-term Outcomes in 50 to 65-year-olds

January 17, 2025 updated by: Alissa Florian, Medical University of Vienna

Association Between Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement and Long-term Outcomes in 50 to 65-year-olds: Results of the AUTHEARTVISIT Study

The goal of this observational study o is to compare outcomes after either biological or mechanical aortic valve replacement. The main question it aims to answer:

Is survival better after mechanical aortic valve replacement compared to biological aortic valve replacement? Are there less complications and reoperations after mechanical aortic valve replacement compared to biological aortic valve replacement? We perform a retrospective Data Collection of anonymized Austrian health insurance data.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Objectives: In recent years, age recommendations for the utilization of biological prostheses rather than mechanical prostheses for surgical aortic valve replacement (sAVR) have been significantly reduced. This study evaluated survival rates, major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), and reoperation risks following surgical (sM-AVR) and biological (sB-AVR) AVR, with the aim of providing data to inform optimal prosthesis selection for middle-aged patients between 50 and 65 years.

Methods: A population-based cohort study was conducted using data from the Austrian Health System from 2010 to 2020. Patients undergoing isolated sAVR (n=3761) were categorized into sM-AVR (n=1018) and sB-AVR (n=2743) groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance covariates. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoints included MACEs, reoperation, stroke, bleeding, and post-reoperation survival. Outcomes were assessed using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

3761

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vienna, Austria, 1090
        • Medical University of Vienna

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

  • age between 50 and 65 years
  • st. p. isolated biological or mechanical aortic valve replacement

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age between 50 and 65 years
  • st. p. isolated biological or mechanical aortic valve replacement

Exclusion Criteria:

  • transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI; MEL codes DB025, DB026, DB021, or XN010) as index procedure
  • age <50 or >65 years
  • concomitant heart surgery or additional procedures during the index operation
  • patients receiving a coronary artery stent (MEL codes DD050 or DD060) within four months before AVR

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
sB-AVR
Patients with biological Aortic valve replacement
sM-AVR
Patients with mechanical Aortic valve replacement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Survival
Time Frame: up to 12 years
overall Survival
up to 12 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
reoperation-free survival
Time Frame: up to 12 years
reoperation-free survival after either biological or mechanical AVR
up to 12 years
reoperation
Time Frame: up to 12 years
reoperation after either biological or mechanical AVR
up to 12 years
MACEs
Time Frame: up to 12 years
MACEs after either biological or mechanical AVR
up to 12 years
heart failure
Time Frame: up to 12 years
heart failure after either biological or mechanical AVR
up to 12 years
embolic stroke or ICH
Time Frame: up to 12 years
embolic stroke or ICH after either biological or mechanical AVR
up to 12 years
myocardial infarction
Time Frame: up to 12 years
myocardial infarction after either biological or mechanical AVR
up to 12 years
non-embolic bleeding
Time Frame: up to 12 years
non-embolic bleeding after either biological or mechanical AVR
up to 12 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hendrik J Ankersmit, Univ. Prof. Dr., Medical University of Vienna

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GS1-EK-4/722-2021

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Valve Replacement

Subscribe