Grasshopper: a Novel Clinical Dashboard for Radiologists (Grasshopper)

January 17, 2025 updated by: Jason D. Balkman, Kaiser Permanente
Does a radiology clinical dashboard increase radiologist use of specific reporting language for chest X-rays (CXRs) and thereby decrease rates of unnecessary Emergency Department (ED) prescriptions and follow-up imaging?

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Chest X-rays (CXR) are the most common radiologic exam, comprising nearly one third of total KPNC imaging volume. Despite high CXR utilization, diagnostic yield is frequently low, partly due to the paucity of clinical information provided to radiologists at the time of CXR interpretation, resulting in frequent nonspecific CXR assessments which include terms like "opacities" instead of diagnostic terms such as "pulmonary edema" or "pneumonia". This may contribute to over-treatment and unnecessary follow-up CT imaging. This study proposes the production deployment, active promotion, and evaluation of an innovative clinical dashboard called Grasshopper for radiologists to provide pertinent clinical information at the time of CXR interpretation. The dashboard leverages the electronic medical record to programmatically retrieve, and display select clinical notes, patient lab values, and vital signs. The Grasshopper study aims to prospectively evaluate the impact of Grasshopper on CXR report specificity in ED settings across 15 KPNC service areas, and on downstream care process measures such as prescription and imaging utilization.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Pleasanton, California, United States, 94566
        • Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Kaiser Permanente Northern California CXR is ordered during emergency room visit or inpatient hospitalization

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Grasshopper CXR Dashboard
Computer dashboard application for radiologists that displays relevant clinical information directly from the medical record

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Diagnostic CXR Reports
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 18 months.
Number of CXR reports that employ diagnostic terms in the report impression (e.g. "negative", "pneumonia", "pulmonary edema"), compared with baseline standard of care report impressions.
Through study completion, an average of 18 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Prescriptions after Stat CXR
Time Frame: Through study completion, at an average of 18 months.
Number of antibiotic and diuretic prescriptions the patient receives after having undergone a stat CXR, compared with baseline standard of care.
Through study completion, at an average of 18 months.
Number of CT Imaging exams after Stat CXR
Time Frame: Through study completion, at an average of 18 months.
Number of follow-up CT imaging exams that a patient receives after having undergone a stat CXR, compared with baseline standard of care.
Through study completion, at an average of 18 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2142507

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Pending further organizational guidance

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Edema - Acute

Clinical Trials on Grasshopper dashboard

Subscribe