- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06788210
Geriatric Team in ED: Effects on Rate of Hospitalization and on Community Health Management of Elderly (GerED-21) (GerED-21)
The Role of the Geriatric Team in Facilitating the Emergency Department (ED) Workflow for Elderly Patients: Effects on Rate of Hospitalization and on Community Health Management: A Multicentric Randomized Controlled Intervention Study
The Ger-ED Intervention study focuses on early assessment and intervention in the emergency department (ED) by a specialized geriatric team, which includes a geriatrician, a nurse with expertise in geriatrics and continuity of care from hospital to community and when necessary a social worker. The intervention model is based on Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) and aims to improve the management and care pathways for elderly patients. Through tailored responses, the team is expected to identify the appropriate setting for each patient and coordinate with community services to facilitate a safe return home when hospitalization is avoidable, and the risks outweigh the benefits.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of this dedicated ED multidisciplinary geriatric team intervention on the quality of care for elderly patients presenting at the ED, compared to usual care.
The study is a multicentric interventional randomized controlled trial involving cluster randomization, where calendar weeks are randomized rather than individual patients.
Study Design:
During the weeks designated as 'treatment', the multidisciplinary team will be present in the ED. They will recruit all eligible patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria and provide consent to participate in the study, until the required weekly number is reached.
During the weeks designated as 'control', patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria and provide consent will receive the usual care.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
The GerED-21 study aims to introduce a multidisciplinary geriatric team model across three Northern Italian hospitals to reduce unnecessary hospitalizations among elderly emergency department (ED) patients. The Geriatric Emergency Team (GET) - comprising a geriatrician, a nurse specialized in transitional care, and a social worker - will conduct a front-door comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) to determine which patients require inpatient care and which can be safely discharged.
The study is planned for a 24-month duration. The first six months will focus on training team members, setting up a database, and arranging logistics within the EDs. The target population includes 624 patients aged 75 and older, admitted to the EDs of three hospitals: IRCCS AOU Policlinico di Sant'Orsola Bologna, Ospedale Maggiore AUSL Bologna, and Ospedale Maggiore AOU Parma, over 52 weeks following the start of the study at each site.
At various timepoints, data will be collected from patients, including:
Demographics: Age, sex, education level, housing status (home, sheltered facility, other hospital), cohabitation status (alone, with spouse, others), and primary caregiver.
Referral Details: Whether referred by an attending physician or direct access to the emergency room.
Multidimensional Assessment Data: Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ) , Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), Charlson Comorbidity Index, Rockwood Frailty Index, Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-5 item), and number of medications.
Delirium Screening: Using the 4AT tool. ED Presentation : Date and time of presentation, clinical diagnosis (reason/condition for ED visit and ICD-9 code at discharge), triage color code (1 red, 2 orange, 3 blue, 4 green, 5 white), 3 months following ED access (including intercurrent hospitalizations).
Patients' Follow-up: Follow-up will be conducted through phone calls and record linkage with administrative data at two timepoints: A- At 7 days post-ED discharge, data on new ED visits, hospital admissions, and corresponding diagnoses according to Canadian Emergency Department Information System (CEDIS) and discharge codes (ICD-9) will be collected. B- At 30 days and 3 months post-discharge of the index ED visit for all patients, data on new ED visits, hospitalizations, functional status (Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), institutionalization, and mortality will be collected.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bologna, Italy, 40138
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged ≥ 75 years
- Triage Risk Screening Tool (TRST) score ≥ 2
- Presence of signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with acute pathology requiring immediate intervention (polytrauma, urgent surgery)
- Patients who need specific pathway (STEMI, Stroke, Hip Fracture, patients with highly contagious diseases, for example Sars Cov2)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Control
During the weeks selected as 'control', patients who access and meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be asked for consent to participate in the study and will follow the usual care.
An independent researcher will perform a Multidimensional assessment.
|
|
|
Experimental: The Geriatric Emergency Team (GET) applied CGA to identify adult patients to safely discharge
The Geriatric Emergency Team (GET), including a geriatrician, a nurse expert in transitional care, and a social worker, conducts a front-door Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) to identify patients who require inpatient care and those who can safely be discharged.
The multidimensional assessment includes the following instruments of evaluation: SPMSQ, ADL, IADL, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Rockwood Frailty Index, GCS-5 item, number of medications, and screening for delirium (4AT).
The intervention consists of counseling and information, drug therapy optimization/deprescribing, planning referral to the Center for Diagnosis of Cognitive Disorders and Dementia, contact with the patient's general practitioner, physiotherapy and walking aid prescription, social worker referral, activation of home healthcare and assistance services, transfer to a community hospital/transitional care facility, and assessment for nursing home admission.
|
In comparison to the precedent studies, this project is characterised by some innovative aspects as regards to the design of intervention:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change the ED hospitalization rate in the intervention arm compared with the control arm
Time Frame: Discharge from ED at baseline access
|
Expected result: >= 6% difference in hospitalization rate in patients receiving multidisciplinary evaluation compared to those following the standard care pathway. Measue: Proportion of patients assigned by ED to Emergency Medicine or medical/surgical ward vs. those discharged to home, facility or nursing home. |
Discharge from ED at baseline access
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in rate of new accesses in the ED and hospital admission
Time Frame: Patients participating in the study will also be asked for consent to be contacted by telephone at 7 days, 30 days and three months from access to the PS to carry out the follow-up with respect to secondary outcomes
|
Change in re-attendance rate at the ED within 7 and 30 days after the index access in elderly patients discharged Measure: Proportion of patients who needed a new ED visit for the same reason/condition
|
Patients participating in the study will also be asked for consent to be contacted by telephone at 7 days, 30 days and three months from access to the PS to carry out the follow-up with respect to secondary outcomes
|
|
Change in rate of mortality
Time Frame: Patients participating in the study will also be asked for consent to be contacted by telephone at 7 days, 30 days and three months from access to the PS to carry out the follow-up with respect to secondary outcomes
|
Mortality rates at 30 and 90 days after index access to the ED in all patients. Measure:% of deaths at 30 and at 90 days in all patients after index access to the ED |
Patients participating in the study will also be asked for consent to be contacted by telephone at 7 days, 30 days and three months from access to the PS to carry out the follow-up with respect to secondary outcomes
|
|
Change in rate of loss of autonomy
Time Frame: Patients participating in the study will also be asked for consent to be contacted by telephone at 7 days, 30 days and three months from access to the PS to carry out the follow-up with respect to secondary outcomes
|
Change in Activitiesof Daily Living (ADLs) score at 30 and 90 days after index access to the ED in all patients. Measure: ADLs score (0-6) , where the higher score means better autonomy. Change in Instrumentale Activities of Daily Living (IADLs) score at 30 and 90 days after index access to the ED in all patients. Measure :IADLs score (0-5) in males and (0-8) in females at 30 and 90 days after index access to the ED in all patients, where the higher score means better autonomy |
Patients participating in the study will also be asked for consent to be contacted by telephone at 7 days, 30 days and three months from access to the PS to carry out the follow-up with respect to secondary outcomes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Maria L Lunardelli, MD, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- GerED-21
- 3665 (SIRER)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Comparative Effectiveness Research
-
The University of Hong KongUnknownComparative Effectiveness ResearchChina
-
The University of Hong KongCompletedComparative Effectiveness Research | Community-Based Participatory ResearchChina
-
University of Colorado, DenverNational Library of Medicine (NLM)CompletedImmunization | Health Services Research | Comparative EffectivenessUnited States
-
The Second Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityCompletedClinical Trial | Comparative Effectiveness Research | Equipment SafetyChina
-
Mopsy ResearchRecruitingComparative Effectiveness ResearchHong Kong
-
University of OttawaCompletedMental Disorders | Adolescents | Early Intervention | Comparative Effectiveness Research | Education Curriculum
-
CHU de ReimsCompletedIntensive Care | Interprofessional Relations | Comparative Effectiveness Research | Clinical Competence | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures | Nursing Assessment | Pupil Assessment | Pupillometry | Neurological Examination | Observer VariationFrance
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingNeoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary | Comparative Effectiveness ResearchUnited States
-
Duke UniversityPatient-Centered Outcomes Research InstituteRecruitingPediatrics | Health Care | Comparative Effectiveness | Transitional Care | Family EngagementUnited States
-
VU University of AmsterdamActive, not recruitingIntervention Effectiveness | Implementation ResearchNetherlands