Clinical Evaluation of Effectiveness of the "Therm'Up" Heating Device

January 12, 2026 updated by: ThermoTrauma

Clinical Evaluation of an Innovative Hypothermia Management Strategy in Trauma Patients: Effectiveness of the Therm'Up Heating Device

Here's a concise summary in English without the numbers:

Hypothermia is defined as a core temperature below 35°C and occurs when the body loses more heat than it produces. It is classified by severity: mild (32-35°C), moderate (28-32°C), and severe (<28°C). Trauma patients are particularly vulnerable, as hypothermia can affect cardiac, pulmonary, neurological, and coagulation systems, contributing to the "lethal triad" of metabolic acidosis, coagulopathy, and hypothermia, which increases early mortality risk.

Shivering, a key sign of hypothermia, significantly raises oxygen consumption, making its prevention during prehospital care critical. Passive warming measures, such as insulating survival blankets, are commonly used to prevent heat loss in emergencies. These blankets help maintain body temperature, protecting victims from cold and wind. Hypothermia prevalence among trauma patients on hospital arrival is high, emphasizing the importance of prehospital measures to limit its impact. However, active warming systems are often impractical in prehospital settings, leaving passive methods as the primary strategy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hypothermia is defi ned as a core temperature below 35°C. Accidental hypothermia occurs when the human body loses more heat than it produces, resulting in a drop in body temperature.

Core body temperature is the standard physiological parameter for diagnosing and classifying the severity of hypothermia. Mild accidental hypothermia is defi ned as a core body temperature between 32 and 35°C, moderate hypothermia as a core temperature between 28 and 32°C, and severe hypothermia as a core temperature <28°C.

Trauma patients are at high risk of accidental hypothermia (body temperature ≤ 35°C). Hypothermia has signifi cant consequences on human physiology, including the cardiac, pulmonary, neurological, and hemostatic systems.

Hypothermia is of particular concern in trauma patients because it is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In addition, hypothermia can infl uence blood coagulation by reducing platelet aggregation and increasing fi brinolysis. Three closely related elements: metabolic acidosis, coagulopathy, and hypothermia constitute the "lethal triad" of trauma. The presence of one or more of these elements during the management of a severely traumatized patient increases the risk of early mortality.

The occurrence of shivering in a patient is also an indicator of hypothermia. Shivering can increase oxygen consumption of muscle cells by up to 400%. The goal of prehospital care is to prevent the onset of shivering, making the use of passive warming measures crucial.

In a systematic review, the prevalence of hypothermia in trauma victims on arrival at hospital was found to be high, at 14%.

An observational study conducted by the SMUR (Mobile Emergency and Resuscitation Services) team of eight French hospitals between January 1, 2004 and November 10, 2007, measured the body temperature of 448 patients upon arrival at the hospital. Hypothermia (body temperature ≤ 35°C) was present in 64 of these 448 patients (14%). Optimal patient care can help limit heat loss or hypothermia. It is important to note that the prolonged time required to recover patients after a road accident increases the risk of lasting hypothermia. This hypothermia, linked to the accident, is associated with an increased mortality rate in severely injured patients, which underlines the importance of prehospital efforts to prevent hypothermia.

Prevention of hypothermia in trauma patients in the prehospital care setting is of critical importance. Various devices have been designed to reduce heat loss and/or actively warm patients in a prehospital environment.

Warming strategies are not ideally suited to pre-hospital care due to the complexity of their implementation and their inadequacy to the conditions encountered. Active external systems generate heat transferred to the patient, while passive systems isolate the patient by preventing the dispersion of body heat.

In most cases, passive warming methods are used, such as the use of insulating survival blankets, which still allow the patient to be insulated from the cold. The insulating survival blanket is used in emergency situations to cover a victim and prevent hypothermia. It is an essential product in the event of illness or accident (trauma, fall, etc.), or in the event of a sudden change in temperature, to maintain the victim's body temperature, protect them from the cold and wind and prevent hypothermia. These so-called "isothermal" blankets allow the body temperature to be maintained at around 37°C.

Active external warming is only possible with chemical, electrical methods or warm air blankets, but these are diffi cult to access before arrival at the hospital due to their high cost, their signifi cant environmental impact (single use) and their unsuitability for outdoor use. However, only proactive and early administration of heat can effectively combat hypothermia and its consequences. The use of a heated blanket or better still, a warm air mattress, is much more effective and allows to gain 1 to 2 °C of core temperature per hour. In out-of-hospital and mountain rescue environments, measuring core temperature can guide transport and treatment decisions, although obtaining an accurate value can be difficult.

Developing alternatives to current devices would reduce health risks and allow targeted intervention to control core temperature, thereby preventing or reducing the harmful consequences of hypothermia. This type of innovation would also have the potential to reduce the risks and limitations associated with existing technical procedures. Hence the objective of this clinical investigation to assess the non-inferiority of a new Therm'Up device compared to the survival blanket to prevent hypothermia in trauma patients in prehospital care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Échirolles, France, 38130
        • Grenoble Alpes University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years; Confi dential Page 7on 11 Version No. 2.0 of 2024/12/10
  • Patient at risk of hypothermia presenting with grade A, or B, or C trauma or patient with hypothermia;
  • Patient exposed to cold;
  • Patient with hemorrhage;
  • Patient burned over 20% of body surface area;
  • Patient requiring an intervention delay of more than 30 minutes (between the arrival of the medical team on site and arrival at the hospital)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with known ongoing hyperthermia and/or infections or body injuries such as burns in the area where the breastplate is positioned;
  • Patient presenting with cardiac arrest before the arrival of the team;
  • Patient with bilateral aural bleeding preventing continuous monitoring of the eardrum;
  • Patient covered with insulating bubble wrap;
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman;
  • Patient already participating in an interventional clinical trial;
  • Patient not receiving social security benefi ts;
  • Adult patient subject to a legal protection measure, guardianship or deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental Arm with ThermUp chest protector
Patients benefi ting from the Therm'Up heated chest protector
The intervention Description is exactly the same, except that the patient will be given a ThermUp jacket
Active Comparator: Control Arm with blanket
Patients supported with survival coverage (conventional PEC).

Following calls to emergency medical services, handled by the ground SMUR/SAMU or the air SMUR (HéliSMUR), the operator collects essential information on the nature of the incident and the apparent condition of the injured. A medical team is thus mobilized on site. It takes over from the rescue team (e.g. the SDIS fi refi ghters) who are generally the fi rst to arrive on the scene.

Eligible patients will be randomly assigned consecutively to one of two groups: control (use of the survival blanket) and experimental (use of the Therm'Up breastplate).

Any traumatized person at risk of hypothermia or in hypothermia in a pre-hospital environment, having given verbal consent to participate in the study and meeting the inclusion criteria

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Statistical distribution of the temperature evolution
Time Frame: From the intervention of the medical team on site until discharge from the hospital (1 month maximum)
The statistical distribution of the temperature evolution will be tested to verify whether it follows a normal distribution. The Shapiro-Wilk test and graphical methods will be used to assess this normality.
From the intervention of the medical team on site until discharge from the hospital (1 month maximum)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Thomas Spadoni, Thermotrauma SAS

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 5, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 14, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

According to European Regulation on Data Protection (GDPR, 2016/679, April 2016), we are not allowed to share patients data

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypothermia Due to Cold Environment

Clinical Trials on Patients support with active thermic jacket

Subscribe