- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06791746
Compound Staphylococcal Lysostaphin Vs. Chlorhexidine Mouthrinse for Oral Mucositis in Patients Undergoing Allo-HSCT
January 22, 2025 updated by: XY Zhou, Zhejiang University
Compound Staphylococcal Lysostaphin Versus Chlorhexidine Mouthrinse for the Prophylaxis of Oral Mucositis in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: a Randomized, Controlled, Non-inferiority Clinical Tria
Oral mucositis (OM) is a common complication in patients receiving myeloablative conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).
Chlorhexidine mouthrinse offers a cost-effective prophylactic approach to preventing OM, yet its use is hampered by issues like tooth discoloration, unpleasant taste, and pain on ulcerated surfaces, leading to reduced patient compliance.
This study aims to demonstrate the non-inferior efficacy of a compound Staphylococcal lysostaphin mouthrinse to that of chlorhexidine mouthrinse in reducing OM occurrence in patients receiving myeloablative conditioning allo-HSCT.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study aims to demonstrate the non-inferior efficacy of a compound Staphylococcal lysostaphin mouthrinse (Xinjingjie Mouthrinse®) to that of chlorhexidine mouthrinse in reducing OM occurrence in patients receiving myeloablative conditioning allo-HSCT.
It also seeks to observe patient treatment adherence and pain, so as to provide evidence for the appropriate OM prevention and management measures in clinical practice.
This randomized, controlled, non-inferiority clinical trial was conducted at the Bone Marrow Transplant Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Zhejiang University from January 2020 to December 2021.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
388
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Zhejiang
-
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Bone marrow transplantation center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with malignant hematological diseases who are undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from fully matched sibling donors, unrelated donors, or haploidentical related donors.
- The conditioning regimen is myeloablative, specifically the BUCY regimen (comprising cytarabine, busulfan, and cyclophosphamide), with methotrexate used for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. The dosage of cytarabine is ≥4.0g/m²/day, busulfan is ≥3.2mg/m²/day, and cyclophosphamide is ≥1.8g/m²/day.
- There are no restrictions on age or gender.
- Patients voluntarily agree to participate in this trial.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with an expected survival time of less than one month;
- Patients who have already developed oral mucositis (OM) prior to conditioning;
- Patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation;
- Patients receiving a non-myeloablative conditioning regimen.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: compound Staphylococcal lysostaphin mouthrinse
Patients in the compound Staphylococcal lysostaphin mouthrinse group received OM prophylaxis by sequential gargling with 15 ml of sodium bicarbonate mouthrinse and 15 ml of compound Staphylococcal lysostaphin mouthrinse.
|
Lysostaphin is a proteolytic enzyme produced by a specific species of Staphylococcus, uniquely capable of cleaving the cross-linking pentaglycine bridges within the cell walls of Staphylococcus aureus.
|
|
Active Comparator: chlorhexidine mouthrinse
The chlorhexidine mouthrinse group followed the same protocol using 15 ml of sodium bicarbonate mouthrinse and 15 ml of chlorhexidine mouthrinse.
|
Chlorhexidine mouthrinse offers a cost-effective prophylactic approach to preventing OM.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
cumulative incidence of oral mucositis
Time Frame: Time from day 0 to the day of neutrophil engraftment (usually within 30 days after transplantation).
|
Time from day 0 to the day of neutrophil engraftment (usually within 30 days after transplantation).
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
severity of oral mucositis
Time Frame: Time from day 0 to the day of neutrophil engraftment (usually within 30 days after transplantation).
|
The severity of OM was assessed according to the WHO grading criteria.
|
Time from day 0 to the day of neutrophil engraftment (usually within 30 days after transplantation).
|
|
the onset time of oral mucositis
Time Frame: Time from day 0 to the day of neutrophil engraftment (usually within 30 days after transplantation).
|
Time from day 0 to the day of neutrophil engraftment (usually within 30 days after transplantation).
|
|
|
oral pain
Time Frame: Time from day 0 to the day of neutrophil engraftment (usually within 30 days after transplantation).
|
Oral pain was evaluated using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 to 10, with higher numbers indicating greater pain intensity.
|
Time from day 0 to the day of neutrophil engraftment (usually within 30 days after transplantation).
|
|
compliance with mouth rinsing
Time Frame: Time from day 0 to the day of neutrophil engraftment (usually within 30 days after transplantation).
|
Compliance was measured by the average daily frequency of mouthrinse use.
|
Time from day 0 to the day of neutrophil engraftment (usually within 30 days after transplantation).
|
|
the number of days new analgesics are used due to OM
Time Frame: Time from day 0 to the day of neutrophil engraftment (usually within 30 days after transplantation).
|
Time from day 0 to the day of neutrophil engraftment (usually within 30 days after transplantation).
|
|
|
time to neutrophil engraftment
Time Frame: Time from day 0 to the day of neutrophil engraftment (usually within 30 days after transplantation).
|
Neutrophil engraftment was defined as three consecutive days with a neutrophil count >0.5×10e9/L.
|
Time from day 0 to the day of neutrophil engraftment (usually within 30 days after transplantation).
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 2, 2020
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 31, 2021
Study Completion (Actual)
June 30, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 13, 2025
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 22, 2025
First Posted (Actual)
March 25, 2025
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 25, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 22, 2025
Last Verified
January 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2019.1114
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Oral Mucositis
-
Instituto Nacional de Cancer, BrazilWithdrawnOral Mucositis | Oral Mucositis (Ulcerative) Due to Radiation | Oral Mucositis (Ulcerative) Due to Antineoplastic Therapy | Oral Mucositis Due to RadiationBrazil
-
Air Force Military Medical University, ChinaCompletedMucositis OralChina
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedOral Mucositis | Radiation Induced Oral Mucositis | Oral Mucositis Due to RadiationEgypt
-
University Hospital, ToulouseRecruiting
-
Catalysis SLCompletedMucositis OralRussian Federation
-
Ain Shams UniversityNot yet recruitingOral Mucositis Due to ChemotherapyEgypt
-
Zubeyde Ezgi ErcelikCompleted
-
Galera Therapeutics, Inc.CompletedRadiation Induced Oral MucositisUnited States, Canada, Puerto Rico
-
Ghada zakiNot yet recruiting
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingChemotherapy Induced Oral Mucositis