Pharmacist-Led SDoH Screening Intervention During Transitions of Care in an Acute Care Setting

September 15, 2025 updated by: David Matthew Jacobs, State University of New York at Buffalo

Implementation of a Pharmacist-Led Social Determinants of Health Screening Intervention During Transitions of Care in an Acute Care Setting

The study is a quasi-experimental pilot study conducted at Buffalo General Medical Center (BGMC). It aims to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of a pharmacist-led intervention addressing health-related social needs (HRSN) during transitions of care in the emergency department. The intervention involves: 1) pharmacist led medication review, 2) screening patients using the Accountable Health Communities (AHC) HRSN tool, connecting them to local community-based organizations, and 3) conducting follow-up to assess outcomes. The study will recruit 150 patients (50 intervention and 100 control) and assess healthcare utilization metrics, including hospital readmissions and emergency department visits.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study is a quasi-experimental pilot project conducted at Buffalo General Medical Center (BGMC). Using a pre-post design with a non-equivalent control group, the study aims to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of a pharmacist-led intervention addressing health-related social needs (HRSN) during care transitions in the emergency department (ED). Eligible patients, including English-speaking adults aged 18 or older will be identified daily through the ED worklist by trained research assistants. Participants will undergo screening using the Accountable Health Communities (AHC) HRSN tool to identify unmet needs such as housing instability, food insecurity, and transportation challenges.

The intervention includes: 1) pharmacist led medication reconciliation, 2) providing patients with tailored referrals to community-based organizations identified through the 211 WNY resource database, based on their specific social needs and geographic location and 3) follow-up phone calls within one month will assess whether participants contacted the referred organizations and whether these services were helpful. A patient satisfaction survey will also be conducted during these follow-up calls to gauge attitudes toward the intervention.

The historical control group will include patients admitted or discharged from the ED during the same timeframe as the intervention group but without HRSN screening. Control group data, including healthcare utilization outcomes, will be extracted from the electronic health record (EHR). Outcomes of interest include feasibility measures such as recruitment rates and data completeness, acceptability metrics like patient satisfaction, and secondary outcomes such as unplanned hospital readmissions and ED visits at 30 days and 3 months post-discharge.

Data analysis will involve statistical comparisons of demographic and clinical characteristics between the intervention and control groups using Chi-square tests for categorical variables and Wilcoxon Rank-sum or t-tests for continuous variables. Multivariable logistic regression will assess the impact of the intervention on healthcare utilization outcomes.

The study expects to recruit 50 patients in the intervention group and 100 in the control group over eight months, with a total study duration of 12 months, including follow-up and data analysis. By integrating pharmacists into HRSN screening and referral processes, the study aims to address critical social determinants of health, improve care transitions, and reduce healthcare utilization in underserved populations.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

58

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14203
        • Buffalo General Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Age: Patients must be at least 18 years old.

Status: Patients being seen at Buffalo General Medical Center (BGMC).

Discharge Plan: It is anticipated that the patient will be discharged home. Control Group: Patients in the control group will meet the same inclusion criteria as those in the intervention group, except they will not receive the health-related social needs (HRSN) screening.

Exclusion Criteria:

Cognitive Impairment: Patients who are cognitively impaired and unable to consent will be excluded.

Non-English Speakers: Non-English speaking individuals are excluded due to the nature of the intervention requiring direct communication between the clinical pharmacist and participants

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Control
The control arm of the study consists of a historical cohort of patients who were admitted to or discharged from the emergency department (ED) at Buffalo General Medical Center (BGMC) during the same timeframe as the intervention arm but did not receive the pharmacist-led health-related social needs (HRSN) screening or referral intervention. These patients are identified through the electronic health record (EHR) based on the same inclusion criteria as the intervention group, such as age, geographic location, and discharge disposition. Control participants are matched 1:1 with intervention participants using demographic and clinical characteristics, including age (within 5 years), zip code, insurance type, discharge status, and race. Data for the control arm include healthcare utilization metrics such as 30- and 90-day unplanned hospital readmissions and emergency department visits. The control arm serves as a comparator to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention
Experimental: Intervention
The intervention incorporates a multifaceted pharmacist-led approach to addressing health-related social needs (HRSN) during transitions of care in the emergency department (ED) at Buffalo General Medical Center (BGMC). The intervention includes: 1) pharmacist-led medication reconciliation, and 2) HRSN screening using the Accountable Health Communities (AHC) HRSN tool. Based on the results, patients receive tailored referrals to community-based organizations using the 211 WNY database, which provides localized resources aligned with their social needs. Each patient is given a printed handout detailing the referral information. Within one month, a follow-up phone call is conducted to follow up with patients and assess additional needs as well as collect feedback through a patient satisfaction survey.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Healthcare Utilization
Time Frame: 30 days post discharge
The primary outcome measure of the study is the composite rate of unplanned, all-cause hospital readmissions or emergency department (ED) visits within 30 days of hospital discharge.
30 days post discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intervention feasibility and fidelity metrics
Time Frame: Through study completion and up to 30 day post discharge

Recruitment Rates: The proportion of eligible patients who are approached and consented for the intervention.

Completion Rates: The number of patients who complete all aspects of the intervention, including follow-up and patient satisfaction surveys.

Follow-Up Rates: The proportion of participants who successfully engage with referred community-based organizations (CBOs).

Through study completion and up to 30 day post discharge
Intervention Acceptability
Time Frame: Through study completion and up to 30 days post-discharge

Patient satisfaction with the HRSN screening and referral process, assessed through post-intervention surveys.

Participant attitudes toward pharmacist-led social care interventions in an acute care setting.

Through study completion and up to 30 days post-discharge
Rates of unplanned hospital readmissions and emergency department visits
Time Frame: Up to 90 days post-discharge

Rate of Unplanned, All-Cause Hospital Readmissions at 30 and 90 Days: This evaluates the frequency of unplanned hospital readmissions within 30 and 90 days post-discharge in both the intervention and control groups.

Rate of Unplanned, All-Cause Emergency Department (ED) Visits at 30 and 90 Days: This measures the number of unplanned ED visits within 30 and 90 days post-discharge for both groups, providing additional insights into healthcare utilization.

Up to 90 days post-discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 31, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 17, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pharmacy

Clinical Trials on Intervention

Subscribe