Effectiveness of Structured Myofacial Chain Exercises After Distal Radius Fracture

January 10, 2024 updated by: Sebnem Nur Alkan, Bahçeşehir University

Investigation of the Effectiveness of Structured Myofacial Chain Exercise Training Applied in the Early Period After Distal Radius Fracture

When determining the treatment method to be applied in distal radius fracture (DRF), in addition to clinical and radiological evaluation, the patient's age, physical activity level, cognitive status, severity of trauma, mechanism of injury and type of fracture are important factors in the treatment plan. Clinical studies show that physiotherapy is useful in improving the limitation of movement and pain in DRF. It shows that the active movement level is increased by decreasing the level. Rehabilitation after surgery proceeds similarly to conservative treatment. When exercise approaches in the literature are examined, it is seen that specific exercises for the wrist and forearm are recommended for treatment, but it has been reported that there are not enough studies to constitute evidence value. For decades, the skeletal muscles of the human body have been characterized as independent structures. However, recent research supports the "single muscle theory", contrary to this classical view. According to this theory, the fascia tissue that covers the entire body connects the muscles to each other in the form of chains, and the muscles in the chain work together in performing functional movements. These chains are called myofascial chains. Fascia tissue that creates all these connections; It consists of tightly arranged connective tissue and is structurally similar to tendons and ligaments. It surrounds organs, muscles, vessels and nerves, connects tissues and allows them to slide and move over each other. Past histological studies have reported that there are also contractile cells in the fascia structure. Although there are problems in rehabilitation after DRF that go beyond a single segment and affect the whole body; There is no study in the literature that uses the myofascial chain exercises approach in the treatment of these problems. In the light of all this information, the thesis study aims to ensure the active participation of the upper body muscles in the rehabilitation process with the DRUK program planned with myofascial chain exercises and in this way to improve the functional level obtained as a result of rehabilitation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Clinical studies show that physiotherapy is useful in improving the limitation of movement in distal radius fractures and increases the level of active movement by reducing the level of pain. Providing functional restoration with physiotherapy not only increases the quality of life but also reduces the number of days patients cannot go to work. Rehabilitation after surgery proceeds similarly to conservative treatment. When exercise approaches in the literature are examined, it is seen that specific exercises for the wrist and forearm are recommended for treatment, but it has been reported that there are not enough studies to constitute evidence value. Due to the increased risk of prolonged immobilization and damaged tissues after surgery compared to closed reduction; If problems such as disuse atrophy, loss of proprioception and joint range of motion are taken into consideration, all upper extremity disorders may occur after surgery, including the elbow and shoulder joints, which are positioned together with the wrist and whose use is restricted. The following have been reported as early and late complications after surgical treatments: i)Complex regional pain syndrome, reflex sympathetic dystrophy, algodystrophy, compartment syndrome; ii) Tendon adhesion or rupture; iii)Nerve compression; iv) Post traumatic arthritis; v)Dupuytren's contracture. Although some of these complications are related to surgery, other complications are affected by processes involving the fascial system. For decades, the skeletal muscles of the human body have been characterized as independent structures. However, recent research supports the "single muscle theory", contrary to this classical view. According to this theory, the fascia tissue that covers the entire body connects the muscles to each other in the form of chains, and the muscles in the chain work together in performing functional movements. These chains are called myofascial chains. In cadaveric studies, mechanical force transfer along these connections has been demonstrated, and this connection has been tried to be explained with biotensegrite models. Due to this load transfer, all structures on the chain are affected by the forces or disorders that any structure in the myofascial chain is exposed to, and this is explained by the biotensivity theory. Fascia tissue that creates all these connections; It consists of tightly arranged connective tissue and is structurally similar to tendons and ligaments. It surrounds organs, muscles, vessels and nerves, connects tissues and allows them to slide and move over each other. Past histological studies have reported that there are also contractile cells in the fascia structure. Although there are problems in rehabilitation after distal radius fracture that go beyond a single segment and affect the whole body; There is no study in the literature that uses the myofascial chain exercises approach in the treatment of these problems. In the light of all this information, the thesis study aims to ensure the active participation of the upper body muscles in the rehabilitation process with the distal radius fracture program planned with myofascial chain exercises and in this way to improve the functional level obtained as a result of rehabilitation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34000
        • Bahçeşehir University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being between the ages of 18-70
  • Being able to establish written and verbal communication in Turkish
  • Post-Op rehabilitation after primary DRF surgery, at 4 weeks, post op at 6 weeks at the l latest
  • Fixation using volar plating and nailing method
  • Post-op, if instruments were left temporarily, these instruments should be removed before the study
  • No previous history of surgery involving the upper extremity
  • To have sufficient technological device usage skills and fast internet infrastructure to use video communication technologies without any problems
  • Having a device that provides the necessary equipment for video calling
  • Having a table and 6 m2 of space to allow exercise in the living area

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Occurrence of one of the complex regional pain syndrome subtypes after fracture
  • History of any chronic systemic, rheumatological, neurological, vascular disease
  • History of traumatic injury to intact extremities and trunk in the last 6 months
  • Presence of pain complaints including spine and shoulder pain over 3 according to the Visual Analogue Scale
  • Those who use anti-inflammatory drugs
  • Presence of cognitive or psychological illness that will prevent cooperation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control Group
Participants will do any exercises. They will join only assessment sessions.
Active Comparator: Upper Extremity Exercises Group
Participants will treated exercises with focused on upper extremity especially wrist muscles.
Participants who have inclusion criterias after DRF reconstrontion pos-op 4. week will included this study. Certified Physiotherapist who have master of science degree and doctorate student will assessed them before and after treatment with face to face. Also exercise education will give face to face with same therapist. After that first sessions patients will progress their standardize or structered exercises pragram with telerehabilition during 4 weeks and 16 sessions. All sessions will be supervised with physiotherapist. End of study assessments will perform again with same therapist.
Experimental: Myofascial Chains Exercises Group
Participants will treated exercises with focused on whole body especilly myofascial chains.
Participants who have inclusion criterias after DRF reconstrontion pos-op 4. week will included this study. Certified Physiotherapist who have master of science degree and doctorate student will assessed them before and after treatment with face to face. Also exercise education will give face to face with same therapist. After that first sessions patients will progress their standardize or structered exercises pragram with telerehabilition during 4 weeks and 16 sessions. All sessions will be supervised with physiotherapist. End of study assessments will perform again with same therapist.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quick DASH (The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand)
Time Frame: Pre treatment and end of study (4 weeks after from first assessment)
Quick-DASH is an 11-item questionnaire that questions a person's limitations in upper extremity problems.
Pre treatment and end of study (4 weeks after from first assessment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Pre treatment and end of study (4 weeks after from first assessment)
This scale scores from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate worse pain.
Pre treatment and end of study (4 weeks after from first assessment)
Hand Functional Index (HFI)
Time Frame: Pre treatment and end of study (4 weeks after from first assessment)
The hand functional index scale consists of 9 items. Each item is scored between 0-3. It is calculated by adding the scores from all items separately for both hands.
Pre treatment and end of study (4 weeks after from first assessment)
Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ)
Time Frame: Pre treatment and end of study (4 weeks after from first assessment)
It is a survey that includes six subheadings from patients (pain, hand function, satisfaction with hand function, work performance, ADL and aesthetic satisfaction).
Pre treatment and end of study (4 weeks after from first assessment)
Joint Range of Motion Measurement Test With Goniometer
Time Frame: Pre treatment and end of study (4 weeks after from first assessment)
Joint range of motion evaluation was made with a goniometer device and flexion, extension, radial-ulnar deviation angles were evaluated.
Pre treatment and end of study (4 weeks after from first assessment)
Hand Grip Strength Measurement Test With Hand Dynamometer
Time Frame: Pre treatment and end of study (4 weeks after from first assessment)
During the test, the patient was in a sitting position and the force value was recorded by squeezing the device in the palm of the hand and not supporting the body with the elbow.
Pre treatment and end of study (4 weeks after from first assessment)
Pinch Grip Strength With Pinch Meter
Time Frame: Pre treatment and end of study (4 weeks after from first assessment)
The force value was recorded by the researcher, by holding the device from the indicator part and asking the subject to squeeze it between the thumb and index finger in a sitting position.
Pre treatment and end of study (4 weeks after from first assessment)
Fingertip Dexterity and Gross Movement of the Hand With The Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT)
Time Frame: Pre treatment and end of study (4 weeks after from first assessment)
With materials such as metal pipe beads and sequin beads inside the device; The subject was asked to perform the exercises against the clock in the order and ways specified in the guide.
Pre treatment and end of study (4 weeks after from first assessment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 2, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

January 10, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 29, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Distal Radius Fractures

Clinical Trials on Therapeutic Exercises

3
Subscribe