Comparison of Effectiveness of Disinfectants

February 2, 2025 updated by: Hira Amjad, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Pakistan

Comparison of Effectiveness of Sodium Hypochlorite and Chlorhexidine Gluconate for Disinfection of Gutta Percha Cones

This is a comparative experimental study to compare the efficacy of chemical disinfection agents , sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate in decontaminating gutta percha cones

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The study design is a comparative study which was done to compare the efficacy of chemical disinfection agents on decontaminating the gutta percha cones .

In this study, 124 standardized size-80 gutta-percha (GP) cones (Dentsply, Germany) were used to assess the efficacy of chemical disinfectants.

The cones were first sterilized using ethylene oxide to ensure baseline sterility. Following sterilization, 124 cones were allocated into two experimental groups (n = 62 each) for contamination.

group A . gp were immersed in 20ml of Enterococcus faecalis solution group B . gp were immersed in 20 ml of human saliva in patients undergoing root canal therapy

samples were incubated at 37°C for 72 hours to ensure uniform and thorough contamination

after incubation period cones were dried and divide into subgroups based on disinfectant agent applied .

The cones were immersed in disinfectant agent for 1 min and 10 min . Cones were dried again and immersed in brain heard infusion broth samples were again incubated at 37°C for 72 hours The presence of bacterial growth was determined by assessing turbidity in the broth, indicating viable microorganisms.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

124

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan, 46000
        • Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • healthy individual age between 20-40 patient needed root canal therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient not willing to participate in study participants with systemic disease patients with neuromuscular disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Naocl group
In this group, the Gp cones would be submerged in 5% naocl solution for 5 minutes and then tested for biofilm removal and eradication of inoculated microorganisms.
Sodium hypochlorite used in 5% concentration for disinfection
Active Comparator: chlorhexidine group
In this group, the Gp cones would be submerged in 0.2% chlorhexidine solution for 5 minutes and then tested for biofilm removal and eradication of inoculated microorganisms.
Chlorhexidine 0.2% concentration for disinfection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
effectiveness of disinfectants by assessing turbidity in broth using mann whitney test
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Following disinfection, all gutta-percha (GP) cones were dried again with sterile gauze and placed individually into sterile test tubes containing 20 mL of fresh brain heart infusion (BHI) broth. The test tubes were incubated at 37°C for 72 hours. The presence of bacterial growth was determined by assessing turbidity in the broth, indicating viable microorganisms. Quantitative analysis of turbidity data was performed using the Mann-Whitney test and Kruskal-Wallis test to evaluate the effectiveness of the disinfectants across the groups.
24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hafiza Hira Amjad, BDS, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 24, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 24, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

June 25, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Root Canal Infection

Clinical Trials on Sodium Hypochlorite

Subscribe