Bacterial Reduction and Post Operative Endodontic-pain Using Different Kinematics

September 5, 2021 updated by: Shehab El Din Mohamed Saber, Ain Shams University

Bacterial Reduction and Post Operative Pain After Cleaning and Shaping of Root Canals With Single File Systems Used in Different Kinematics

This study was conducted to compare the antibacterial effect and degree of postoperative pain of single rotary and reciprocating file systems during endodontic therapy

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Introduction: Instrumentation kinematic is one of the many aspects of shaping files that underwent heavy development through the last decade. The impact of the type of motion used to drive shaping instruments was heavily studied but mostly in-vitro. More randomized clinical trials are needed to achieve a reliable body of data concerning the issue.

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of varying shaping files' kinematics on bacterial reduction, post-operative pain and the incidence of flare-ups. Methods: Necrotic, asymptomatic, single-rooted mandibular premolars with single canals were used in the study, where 46 patients were randomly allocated to two groups. In the first group, WaveOne Gold was used for mechanical preparation while One Shape was used in the second group. Samples were taken preoperatively (S1) and after chemomechanical preparation (S2). Bacterial reduction was evaluated and compared between both groups via culturing technique and quantitative analysis by real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Post-operative pain and the incidence of flare-ups were also evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) method.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • faculty of Dentistry. Ain Shams University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 46 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • mandibular premolars
  • single rooted
  • single canalled
  • necrotic pulps
  • asymptomatic apical periodontitis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • gross caries
  • root/crown fracture
  • sinus tract
  • swelling
  • intake of antibiotics within previous 3 months
  • pain with percussion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: rotation
root canal preparation performed using rotating instruments
root canal treatment
Active Comparator: reciprocation
root canal preparation performed using reciprocating instruments
root canal treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
bacterial reduction
Time Frame: up to 1 hour
pre-instrumentation and post-instrumentation bacterial cultures to detect change in bacterial count after root canal instrumentation with the different kinematics
up to 1 hour
post operative pain
Time Frame: after the treatment visit by 24 hours
Visual analogue scale from 0-100 where 0 is the lowest and 100 is the highest
after the treatment visit by 24 hours
post operative pain
Time Frame: after the treatment visit by 48 hours
Visual analogue scale from 0-100 where 0 is the lowest and 100 is the highest
after the treatment visit by 48 hours
post operative pain
Time Frame: after the treatment visit by 72 hours
Visual analogue scale from 0-100 where 0 is the lowest and 100 is the highest
after the treatment visit by 72 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: shehabeldin M Saber, phd, Professor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 4, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FDASU-RECD091615

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Root Canal Infection

Clinical Trials on root canal shaping

Subscribe