Interest of Nurse Participation During Epicutaneous-cavity Catheter Placement in Neonatal Intensive Care (IPICAVE)

February 3, 2025 updated by: University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

To meet the needs of newborns in neonatal intensive care and ensure long-term venous access, a percutaneous central venous catheter (KTEC) is inserted. According to the recommendations of the French Society of Hospital Hygiene, the placement of this device is the responsibility of a medical professional. It may require several attempts to ensure the success of the procedure.

The pain associated with the needle insertion is generally controlled, but with repeated attempts, the newborn may become agitated, cry, and be difficult to calm. The study by Courtois et al. showed that pain in infants under 45 weeks of gestational age increased with the number of attempts. Acute and repeated pain in newborns can lead to trauma and disturbances in psychological, cognitive, and motor development.

In the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at the University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, the procedure is performed by the physician alone (i.e., "two hands"), whereas in other NICUs in France, the procedure is systematically performed by a nurse/physician team (i.e., "four hands"). However, no comparative study has been conducted to date to assess the impact of this "four hands" approach on the number of needle attempts and the pain experienced by the newborn.

The investogator hypothesize that the training and participation of the nurse (pediatric nurse) during the placement of the KTEC, in collaboration with the physician, could reduce the number of needle attempts and the newborn's pain. Therefore, the investigator aim to conduct a randomized, monocentric pilot study in the neonatal intensive care unit at the University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of the University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand (63), the study will begin with the training of a group of nurse practitioners (I(P)DE) to perform KTEC insertions in pairs over a six-month period. After this training, if a KTEC insertion is required, the investigator will ask the parents or guardians of eligible newborns for their consent to participate in the IPICAVE study (pre-inclusion visit).

If they agree, inclusion/randomization will take place after the parents or legal guardians sign the informed consent form for study participation.

The inclusion period will last for 18 months, and the study participation for each newborn will begin with the first needle insertion during the procedure and end at the conclusion of the dressing change after successful KTEC insertion or upon the last needle insertion if the attempt fails. During the KTEC insertion, the responsible I(P)DE will complete a data collection form to assess the various study criteria.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

96

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newborns born between 25 and 42 weeks of amenorrhea requiring KTEC insertion
  • Newborn whose parents or guardians have been informed of the study and are capable of providing informed consent to participate in the research.
  • Informed consent obtained from parents or guardians
  • Parents of legal age (≥18 years)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Parents under guardianship or curatorship, deprived of liberty or under court protection
  • Parents who do not speak or understand French
  • Newborn born under X

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 4 hand

At D1, on the first attempt, the KTEC will be inserted by an I(P)DE/physician pair served by the nurse in charge of the child (whatever their level of experience) using the standard method, with no limit to the number of injections.

At D2, if KTEC insertion fails at D1, a second attempt will be made, respecting the newborn's randomization arm. This second attempt must be carried out by an I(P)DE/doctor pair, with the nurse having a minimum of three years' seniority in a neonatal intensive care unit, and whose expertise will ensure successful insertion, with the number of injections limited to five.

At D3, in the event of a further failure at D2, a third and final attempt will be made by a senior doctor, with no limit on the number of injections (to encourage success), in line with current department practice.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

success of catheter insertion
Active Comparator: 2 hand

At D1, on the first attempt, the KTEC will be inserted by the doctor alone (junior or senior, depending on availability), assisted by the nurse responsible for the child, using the standard method, with no limit on the number of injections.

On D2, if KTEC insertion fails on D1, a second attempt will be made, respecting the newborn's randomization arm. This second attempt must be made by a senior doctor in the department, whose expertise will help ensure successful insertion, with the number of injections limited to five.

At D3, in the event of a further failure at D2, a third and final attempt will be made by another senior doctor, with no limit on the number of injections (to encourage success), in line with the department's current practice.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

success of catheter insertion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Successfull of KTEC insertion
Time Frame: within day 3
Total number of injections until successful KTEC insertion.
within day 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
success rate of the procedure.
Time Frame: within day 3
Success or failure of KTEC insertion.
within day 3

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain evaluation
Time Frame: within day 3
Average and maximum pain during injections, measured by hetero-evaluation scales
within day 3
number of insertion attempts in cases of previous failure
Time Frame: within day 3
Total number of previous unsuccessful placement attempts
within day 3
procedure time
Time Frame: within day 3
procedure time in minutes
within day 3
Study the factors associated with the total number of bites
Time Frame: within day 3
number of bites according to the occurrence or non-occurrence of state of consciousness (awake or sedated newborn)
within day 3
Study factors associated with average and maximum pain in newborns
Time Frame: within day 3
average and maximum pain according to state of gestational age (in weeks of amenorrhea: ˂29 , 29 to 32, 33 to 36, 37 to 42, and >42)
within day 3
hemoglobin levels
Time Frame: within day 3
Percentage change in hemoglobin between two consecutive days (dependent variable) and number of injections performed between the two hemoglobin measurements (independent variable)
within day 3
Study the factors associated with the total number of bites
Time Frame: within day 3
number of bites according to catheter type (Premicath, Epicutaneocave, Nutriline twinflow)
within day 3
Study factors associated with average and maximum pain in newborns
Time Frame: within day 3
average and maximum pain according to insertion site (left/right upper limb, left/right lower limb, skull)
within day 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nathalie SATURNIN LENOBLE, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 4, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 4, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Premature Birth

Clinical Trials on catheter insertion

Subscribe