Interdisciplinary Interventions After mTBI

August 11, 2025 updated by: Rune Skovgaard Rasmussen

Effect of Interdisciplinary Interventions After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

The investigators aim to investigate the impact of interdisciplinary and individually tailored programs for mTBI (concussion) on quality of life and work capacity, both at the conclusion of the program and after 1 and 3 years. The investigators also want to examine whether early intervention is significant by comparing individuals who enter the program between 1 and 3 months post-concussion with those who only start the program more than 9 months post-concussion. Such a study has not been conducted before and can provide valuable insights into long-term effects and the importance of early intervention

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A concussion typically results from a trauma to the head or body and, for most people, causes symptoms that resolve within a few weeks. Approximately 25,000 individuals in Denmark experience concussions annually. However, about 8,000 to 11,000 of those affected experience prolonged symptoms such as fatigue, dizziness, headaches, pain, and cognitive impairments. These symptoms can significantly reduce quality of life and work capacity, and in some cases, become chronic. Consequently, a subset of individuals with concussions require ongoing social support even two years post-injury.

Denmark currently lacks a comprehensive national guideline for managing concussions within regional and municipal healthcare systems. As a result, individuals with concussions are often left to navigate the healthcare system on their own, leading to limited or no access to rehabilitation services. The Danish Center for Concussion and other experts have recommended the establishment of national concussion clinics.

Since 2016, the Special Education and Employment Unit (SuB) in Slagelse, part of the municipality's Center for Disability and Psychiatry, has been developing and providing concussion interventions based on national and international evidence. Participants in these programs have reported significant improvements in weekly work hours and overall quality of life. However, the long-term effects of these interventions remain unknown.

Participants are typically in great distress and need help, which is why a lack of interventions-or the delay of interventions for several months-in a control group is considered unethical. It should be noted that single-group studies, which evaluate outcomes longitudinally, are often the only possible method and can provide both interesting and reliable results. Investigators will be blinded for participants being allocated to early or late interventions.

This single-center and uncontrolled study aims to investigate the long-term impact of interdisciplinary and personalized concussion rehabilitation programs on quality of life and work capacity. Researchers will compare the outcomes of individuals who begin the program within 1-3 months post-concussion to those who start later (more than 9 months post-concussion) to determine the significance of early intervention. This research is groundbreaking as it will provide valuable insights into the long-term effects of concussions and the importance of timely interventions.

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of tailored concussion rehabilitation programs.

Outcomes: Changes in quality of life and work capacity. Timeframes: Immediate post-program and at 1 and 3 years. Comparison: Early vs. late intervention. Significance: The study will fill a gap in the current understanding of concussion recovery.

In essence, this study seeks to determine if a comprehensive and individualized approach to concussion rehabilitation can lead to sustained improvements in the lives of those affected, and whether starting treatment sooner is beneficial.

The investigators expect that an early intervention will result in significantly higher average weekly work hours and quality of life compared to a late intervention. The main hypothesis is that an early intervention will counteract the chronic effects and prevent worsening, including by inhibiting the development of hypersensitivity to sound and light.

The vision is to offer an intervention for concussion sufferers at the highest international level, and with this focus, it is important to know the long-term effects.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

140

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Rune S Rasmussen, MSc, PhD
  • Phone Number: +45 28757500
  • Email: rsras@slagelse.dk

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Two cohorts will be followed, one group of adults included between 1 and 3 months after a concussion, and another group experiencing a concussion 9 months before inclusion.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults who are medically diagnosed with a concussion.
  • Adults with a connection to the labor market.
  • Participants must be able to communicate in Danish and be able to independently participate in the intervention.
  • Participants must be able to transport themsleves to and from SuB facility for their treatment sessions.
  • Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) score must be at least 20, indicating a significant severity of symptoms following a concussion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Persons without medically verified concussion.
  • Person where brain injury was found at symptom onset.
  • Persons with significant cognitive dysfunction.
  • Persons who are unable to understand Danish or with communication disorders that hinder test performance.
  • Persons with terminal illness or other progressive disease.
  • Chronic use of opioids.
  • Significant abuse of alcohol or euphoriants or narcotics or other serious illnesses that may affect test results or ability/possibility of attendance.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Early intervention

Interventions for mTBI patients initiated within 1 to 3 months after symptoms onset:

Interventions include psychoeducation for the individual, their family, and their workplace or educational setting. Investigators initiate contact with the individual's workplace or educational setting to discuss the case and collaborate closely with both the individual and their employer/supervisor. Investigators focus on vocational rehabilitation, aiming to gradually increase the participant's work capacity, weekly working hours, and job retention. Ongoing supportive conversations are provided before and during work or study. Investigators offer counseling on cognitive and psychological aspects, with a focus on mental health.

All interventions focus on gradual progression, exposure, and rehabilitation in both personal and work life. Participants are guided in gradually increasing activities and working hours.

Focus on understanding mechanisms of concussion
Gradual training and physical exercises
Treatment given individually or in groups
Training and examination by a neuro-optometrist
Counselling to achieve better sleep and reduce fatigue.
Training by certified mindfulness instructor
The Concussion Team therapists work with a patient's employer to facilitate a gradual return to normal working hours.
Counselling to achieve more energy and vitality.
Talks with a neuropsychologist about mTBI sequelae.
Late intervention

Interventions for mTBI patients initiated at least 9 months after symptoms onset. Note that these interventions are the same as offered to the early interventions group:

Interventions include psychoeducation for the individual, their family, and their workplace or educational setting. Investigators initiate contact with the individual's workplace or educational setting to discuss the case and collaborate closely with both the individual and their employer/supervisor. Investigators focus on vocational rehabilitation, aiming to gradually increase the participant's work capacity, weekly working hours, and job retention. Ongoing supportive conversations are provided before and during work or study. Investigators offer counseling on cognitive and psychological aspects, with a focus on mental health.

All interventions focus on gradual progression, exposure, and rehabilitation in both personal and work life. Participants are guided in gradually increasing activities and working hours.

Focus on understanding mechanisms of concussion
Gradual training and physical exercises
Treatment given individually or in groups
Training and examination by a neuro-optometrist
Counselling to achieve better sleep and reduce fatigue.
Training by certified mindfulness instructor
The Concussion Team therapists work with a patient's employer to facilitate a gradual return to normal working hours.
Counselling to achieve more energy and vitality.
Talks with a neuropsychologist about mTBI sequelae.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Weekly working hours
Time Frame: Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
Weekly working hours, measured in hours, will be assessed at baseline and after the intervention is completed. Subsequently, working hours will be assessed 1, 2, and 3 years after the intervention is completed. Follow-up will be conducted via telephone calls
Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ)
Time Frame: Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
Scores range from 0 to 64, low scores are best.
Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
Work Role Functioning Questionnaire v. 2.0 (WRFQ 2.0).
Time Frame: Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
A higher score on the WRFQ 2.0 indicates better work role functioning. Scores range from 0 to 100.
Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
Behavioural Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adults (BRIEF-A)
Time Frame: Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
T-scores are measured, a score above 65 indicates problems. Scores range from 0 to 99.
Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions
Time Frame: Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
Scores range from 0 to 100, high scores are best.
Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI)
Time Frame: Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
Scores range from 1 to 7, high score is worst.
Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
Brain Injury Vision Symptom Survey (BIVSS)
Time Frame: Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
The total score can range from 0 to 112. A higher score indicates a greater severity of visual symptoms.
Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
King-Devick (K-D)
Time Frame: Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
There is no strict range with clear cut-offs, normative data suggests that healthy individuals complete the test in under 60 seconds.
Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
Vestibular Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS)
Time Frame: Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
If symptoms are provoked, the individual rates their severity on a scale of 0 to 10 (0 = none, 10 = severe).
Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
Reading test
Time Frame: Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
Reading of a short article published in a newspaper. Faster reading times are best.
Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
Major Depression Inventory (MDI)
Time Frame: Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
Scores range from 0 to 50, low scores are best.
Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
Fatigue Severity Scale - 7 item (FSS-7)
Time Frame: Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
Scores range from 1 to 7. Low scores are best.
Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
Visual Analogue Scale for Smerte (VAS)
Time Frame: Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
Scores range from 0 to 10. Low scores are best.
Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
Questionnaire about sound sensitivity and tinnitus
Time Frame: Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
Scores range from 0 to 25, low scores are best.
Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS42)
Time Frame: Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
Scores range from 0 to 42, low scores are best.
Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
Harvard Trauma Questionnaire (HTQ)
Time Frame: Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
Scores ranged from 16 to 64. Low scores are best.
Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale - 7 item (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention
Scores range from 0 to 21, low scores are best.
Measured at inclusion, through study completion (an average of 6 months), and after 6, 12 and 36 months of no intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Rune S Rasmussen, MSc, PhD, Special Education and Employment Unit (SuB) in Slagelse
  • Study Chair: Signe E Petersson, OT, Special Education and Employment Unit (SuB) in Slagelse

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

February 7, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Concussion, Mild

Clinical Trials on Psychoeducation

Subscribe