Opioid Prescribing in the Emergency Department for Sickle Cell Disease (DOPED-SCD)

January 21, 2026 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

Differential Opioid Prescribing in the Emergency Department for Patients With Sickle Cell Disease: a Vignette-based International Randomised Trial.

This study consists of a clinical vignette presented to emergency physicians asking them what they would prescribe to a patient with acute abdominal pain.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1063

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Occitanie
      • Nîmes, Occitanie, France, 30900
        • CHU de Nîmes
    • Manchester
      • Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, M139WL
        • Manchester University NHS FT

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Population will consist in emergency medicine resident and physician, speaking French or English, in European countries.

The population will be recruited with the use of professional networks and social medias

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being a emergency physician

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Working outside of Europe.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Non-black man
the case will present a non black man
The intervention consisted of a randomized questionnaire presenting a clinical case of a patient suffering from severe abdominal pain. The control case was "As an emergency physician in an adult emergency department, you are presented with the following patient: The patient is a 39-year-old non-smoking male/female with a history of Meniere's disease and an allergy to Bactrim. He/she presents with abdominal pain that began abruptly 2 hours ago and has persisted despite taking NEFOPAM 45 minutes ago. This is his first episode. His/her vital signs are blood pressure 140/66, heart rate 91, pulse ox 97%, temperature 36.8°C. He/she rates his/her pain as 8/10 without any analgesic position. On clinical examination he/she presents with localized epigastric tenderness. The rest of the abdomen is soft, painless and depressed. There are hydro-aeriform noises. No diarrhea or vomiting. The rest of the clinical examination showed no abnormalities.". In the intervention case, patient had history of S
Black man
the case will present a non black man
The intervention consisted of a randomized questionnaire presenting a clinical case of a patient suffering from severe abdominal pain. The control case was "As an emergency physician in an adult emergency department, you are presented with the following patient: The patient is a 39-year-old non-smoking male/female with a history of Meniere's disease and an allergy to Bactrim. He/she presents with abdominal pain that began abruptly 2 hours ago and has persisted despite taking NEFOPAM 45 minutes ago. This is his first episode. His/her vital signs are blood pressure 140/66, heart rate 91, pulse ox 97%, temperature 36.8°C. He/she rates his/her pain as 8/10 without any analgesic position. On clinical examination he/she presents with localized epigastric tenderness. The rest of the abdomen is soft, painless and depressed. There are hydro-aeriform noises. No diarrhea or vomiting. The rest of the clinical examination showed no abnormalities.". In the intervention case, patient had history of S
non-black woman
the case will present a non black woman
The intervention consisted of a randomized questionnaire presenting a clinical case of a patient suffering from severe abdominal pain. The control case was "As an emergency physician in an adult emergency department, you are presented with the following patient: The patient is a 39-year-old non-smoking male/female with a history of Meniere's disease and an allergy to Bactrim. He/she presents with abdominal pain that began abruptly 2 hours ago and has persisted despite taking NEFOPAM 45 minutes ago. This is his first episode. His/her vital signs are blood pressure 140/66, heart rate 91, pulse ox 97%, temperature 36.8°C. He/she rates his/her pain as 8/10 without any analgesic position. On clinical examination he/she presents with localized epigastric tenderness. The rest of the abdomen is soft, painless and depressed. There are hydro-aeriform noises. No diarrhea or vomiting. The rest of the clinical examination showed no abnormalities.". In the intervention case, patient had history of S
black woman
the case will present a black woman
The intervention consisted of a randomized questionnaire presenting a clinical case of a patient suffering from severe abdominal pain. The control case was "As an emergency physician in an adult emergency department, you are presented with the following patient: The patient is a 39-year-old non-smoking male/female with a history of Meniere's disease and an allergy to Bactrim. He/she presents with abdominal pain that began abruptly 2 hours ago and has persisted despite taking NEFOPAM 45 minutes ago. This is his first episode. His/her vital signs are blood pressure 140/66, heart rate 91, pulse ox 97%, temperature 36.8°C. He/she rates his/her pain as 8/10 without any analgesic position. On clinical examination he/she presents with localized epigastric tenderness. The rest of the abdomen is soft, painless and depressed. There are hydro-aeriform noises. No diarrhea or vomiting. The rest of the clinical examination showed no abnormalities.". In the intervention case, patient had history of S

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Morphine prescription
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The proportion of patient for which physician would have prescribed morphine
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Analgesic prescription between groups
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
To compare analgesic prescription between groups
through study completion, an average of 1 year
factors associated with differences in management between groups
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
identify factors associated with differences in management (urgency level, morphine prescription and computed tomography scan ordering)
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Differences according to patient and practitioner gender
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
analyze the difference in morphine treatment prescribed according to patient and practitioner gender
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 17, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 19, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

March 19, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sickle Cell Disease

Clinical Trials on opioid prescription

Subscribe