Impact, Cost, and Sustainability of a Customized, Low-Cost Intervention to Reduce Cardiovascular Disease Burden in India: A Cluster Randomized Trial (ENABLE)

May 14, 2025 updated by: St. John's Research Institute

Effect, Cost, and sustaiNability of a Synergistic, Multipronged, Customized, Low-cost Intervention Package to Reduce cArdiovascular Burden Across India: a cLustEr RCT

The ICRAG-2 project aims to assess the impact, cost-effectiveness, and sustainability of a low-cost, multipronged intervention package to reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) burden in India. Given the high CVD mortality rate in India, this study addresses the urgent need for scalable, evidence-based solutions. The project will unfold in three steps: first, formative research including systematic reviews, cross-sectional studies, and qualitative studies will identify key barriers, facilitators, and refine interventions. Next, a matched-pair cluster randomized controlled trial (CRCT) across 26 clusters will evaluate the intervention's impact on CVD outcomes over three years, focusing on therapeutic lifestyle changes, fixed-dose medications, and task-sharing with non-physician health workers. Finally, the project will engage stakeholders through policy dialogues to support potential national-scale implementation. This trial offers a promising model to reduce CVD incidence through customized, sustainable interventions targeting patients, providers, and the health system.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of death worldwide, responsible for approximately 17.9 million deaths each year, which accounts for 31% of all global deaths. The majority of these deaths-about 85%-are due to heart attacks and strokes. In India, CVD has contributed to 28·1% of the total deaths and 14·1% of the total DALYs. There is a remarkably high burden of CVD in India, with an age-standardised death rate of 282 deaths/100,000 (264-293) compared with global levels (233 deaths per 100,000 (229-236). Ischemic heart disease and stroke have been identified as the top two causes of mortality in the country, highlighting the urgent need for effective interventions.

Evidence supports the effectiveness of fixed dose combination treatments and the use of Non-Physician Health Workers (NPHWs) in primary and secondary prevention of CVD. India's healthcare system faces the dual challenge of rising CVD mortality and a lack of integrated preventive and management strategies for CVD at both the primary and secondary care levels. NPHWs play a major role in reducing CVD risk factors.

Despite the growing burden of CVD, there is a notable lack of evidence in India that evaluate comprehensive CVD management strategies across multiple levels, particularly focusing on hard clinical endpoints such as mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and cardiovascular hospitalisations. To fill these gaps, we need a robust implementation trial that evaluates the effectiveness of multiple proven interventions in diverse settings on hard clinical endpoints. Such a trial, likely the first of its kind, would provide key evidence to guide policy decisions to improve CVD management strategies in India.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1560

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Karnataka
      • Bangalore, Karnataka, India, 560034
        • Division of Clinical Research and training St. John's Research Institute Koramangala , - , India
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- 1. High-risk primary prevention A. Patients aged more than 40years of any gender without a CVD event (MI, Stroke) with at least two of the following risk factors, A to E with a 10 year documented evidence OF (a to d) a. Diabetes Mellitus b. Hypertension c. Dyslipidaemia d. Microalbuminuria e. Family history of premature CVD event (MI, stroke or CVD-related death under 55 years) B. Patients aged above 50years of any gender without a CVD event (MI, Stroke) with at least one year of documented disease, at least two A to D (Above) 2. High-risk secondary prevention Patients aged above 40 years or above, with a CVD event with any one of the following: options a. MI or stroke less than three months,
b. MI or stroke, more than three months, but less than one year with at least one comorbid condition, that is A to E (Above).

c. Patients aged above 60 years or above with MI or stroke greater than three months BUT less than one year, without any comorbid condition. These patients are expected to have a moderate to high risk of a CVD event or death in the next three years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • We will exclude patients with any ONE of the following:

    1. Severe cognitive impairment of any aetiology and have no reliable caregivers.
    2. Medical conditions with a survival prognosis of less than 12 months.
    3. Unable to follow-up for the study period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention arm - FDC and TLC and medication adherance
NPHW enabled education and counseliing along with prescribing combination therapies and TLC and availability of low cost rational FDC at hospital pharmacy
Level 1: Patient 1. Rational FDCs 2. NPHWs and PMs mediated therapeutic lifestyle changes 3. Texts/ WhatsApp reminders Level 2:Physician 1. Reinforcing task sharing 2. Providing evidence on FDCs 3. Theory based behavior modification Level 3: Health administrators 1. Pharmacy - Update drug formulary FDCs 2. CV health days 3. Facility strengthening
Experimental: Control arm - Patients will Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) with periodic follow ups.
Patients will Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) with periodic follow ups

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke and CVD-related hospitalisations at three years
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Cost-Effectiveness (incremental cost- effectiveness ratio, ICER) of the IP
Time Frame: 3 years

b) The Cost-Effectiveness (incremental cost- effectiveness ratio, ICER) of the IP c) Key Fidelity Metrics - utilisation rates of fixed-dose combinations, adherence to drug therapy at 12 months, proportion monitoring BP at home, adherence to different components of TLC and optimal referral.

d) Key Implementation Metrics using the Reach Effectiveness-Adoption Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework (Implementation research metric/ framework)

3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in specific publication arising out of the trial, after de-identification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases

Clinical Trials on FDC and TLC and medication adherance

Subscribe