The Trans-Led Care Study (TLC)

March 23, 2026 updated by: Arryn Guy, Illinois Institute of Technology

A Gender-Affirming Stigma Intervention to Improve Substance Misuse and HIV Risk Among Transgender Women

This study is testing a new mutual-help group called "the TLC program" for transgender adults who use substances or are recently in recovery. The TLC Program is based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy or "ACT" which is a type of mental health counseling that focuses on using mindfulness skills to connect a person to their values and improve their mental health. The TLC Program was developed by transgender and gender diverse community members, mental health providers, and researchers.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Transgender (trans) populations are disproportionately impacted by HIV compared to the general population (nearly 1 in 7 trans women are living with HIV; 3.2% of trans men are living with HIV compared to 0.3% in the general U.S. population). Trans people also experience stigma rooted in systems of oppression. To prevent the forward transmission of HIV, public health officials emphasize the need for consistent condom use, regular HIV testing, and linkage to HIV prevention and care services. Stigma, however, interferes with trans individuals' ability to engage in HIV prevention and care due to its negative affects across multiple socioecological levels, including structural policies that constrain resources for trans people, negative community attitudes and prejudicial norms towards trans people, interpersonal discrimination towards trans people resulting in social isolation, and trans individual's psychological and behavioral responses to such stigma and stress. This makes stigma a social and structural determinant of health.

Stigma also plays a significant role in increasing risk for substance misuse among trans adults broadly. Rates of current illicit drug use, cannabis consumption, and/or nonmedical prescription drug use among trans adults are high relative to the U.S. general population (29% vs. 10%, respectively). Heavy alcohol use is also high, with 23% of trans adults consuming alcohol on 11 or more days in the past month Prior research with trans women suggests that unmet gender affirmation needs (i.e., the multitude of ways people receive recognition and support for their gender identity) may lead trans women to seek affirmation in traumatizing and unsafe contexts, such as sex work and sex under the influence of substances. Trans women are also at an increased risk of being targeted for violence, including sexual and physical assault, and substance use is associated with increased risks of victimization.

The Model of Gender Affirmation illustrates that lack of gender affirmation (i.e., the multitude of ways people receive recognition and support for their gender identity) contributes to psychological distress, substance misuse, and HIV risk among trans women. Evidence demonstrates that those who experience stigma report attempts to cope by avoiding or controlling distressing thoughts or feelings (e.g., substance use), which in turn produces greater psychological distress, and interferes with self-care behaviors. Specialized evidence-based interventions delivered in community-based organizations have the potential to reduce the negative effects of internalized stigma on behavioral health.

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is one of the few evidence-based approaches that targets stigma related to a variety of conditions, including substance use disorders and HIV. ACT is a transdiagnostic psychotherapeutic intervention that increases psychological flexibility through mindfulness, acceptance, and behavior change processes. ACT for stigma focuses on the fears, shame, and identification with a stigmatized group that pose a barrier to living a life consistent with one's values. ACT is a promising, but not yet evaluated, intervention to improve stigma among trans adults.

Guided by a community-engaged research approach, the investigators are testing an ACT-based, peer-led, gender affirming mutual-help group (called "the TLC Program") to reduce substance misuse and HIV risk among trans adults. The TLC Program was developed through a needs assessment of adaptations to ACT for integration into community-based organizations serving trans populations. Focus groups and interviews with transgender adults and stakeholders (e.g., organization staff, providers who serve trans clients) identified necessary adaptations. A proof-of-concept test of the TLC Program in an open pilot with (N = 16) trans adults who experienced at least one substance use problem in the past year informed final refinements to the intervention. The TLC Program is now being tested in a randomized controlled feasibility/acceptability trial compared to standard of care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

124

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Arryn Guy, PhD
  • Phone Number: 312-567-6467
  • Email: aguy1@iit.edu

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60616
        • Recruiting
        • Illinois Institute of Technology
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Arryn Guy, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Eligible transgender adults must:

  1. be 18 years of age or older;
  2. speak primarily English;
  3. live in the U.S.;
  4. have a gender identity different from their assumed gender, or sex assigned, at birth;
  5. identify as a person of transgender experience;
  6. endorse having experienced two or more problem(s) related to alcohol or other drug use within the past 12 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Treatment as Usual (TAU)
Participants randomized to the control condition will receive treatment-as-usual (TAU), following SAMHSA guidelines for risky alcohol and other drug use and CDC established standards of care for STD/HIV prevention counseling. Participants meeting criteria for risky alcohol, drug use, or sexual behavior will be provided 15-25 minutes of brief counseling including: 1) a discussion that the participants drinking or drug use is more than the recommended limits for safe consumption, and that staying below these limits is important for their health; 2) a discussion of HIV risk-reduction interventions (i.e., consistent condom use, PrEP, ART treatment as prevention); and 3) referral to treatment (i.e., regular screening for HIV/STDs, HIV care, and/or substance use treatment).
Experimental: The TLC Program
Participants randomized to the TLC Program will receive TAU plus the telehealth, peer-delivered group intervention, "the TLC Program."
Participants randomized to the TLC Program will receive TAU plus the telehealth, peer-delivered group intervention. The TLC Program was adapted from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) - an acceptance and mindfulness-based third wave cognitive behavioral therapy. The intervention will be delivered in a group format with peer facilitators via telehealth using videoconferencing. The protocol covers all six ACT core concepts (i.e., contact with the present, acceptance, defusion, self-as-context, values, and committed action) with tailored examples and exercises focused on gender affirmation, internalized stigma, and substance use. Additional sessions are included defining stigma, how stigma affects physical and sexual health and engagement with healthcare, and values-driven self-care goals of substance use reduction and healthcare engagement. Sessions are approximately 1.5 hours each and are delivered over 12 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gender Minority Stress and Resilience Scale Internalized Transphobia
Time Frame: Reported at baseline assessment, post-assessment (12 weeks), and follow-up assessment (24 weeks)
Minimum value = 0, Maximum value = 1, Higher score = worse outcome
Reported at baseline assessment, post-assessment (12 weeks), and follow-up assessment (24 weeks)
Health Care Empowerment Inventory
Time Frame: Reported at baseline assessment, post-assessment (12 weeks), and follow-up assessment (24 weeks)
Minimum value = 1, Maximum value = 5, Higher score = better outcome
Reported at baseline assessment, post-assessment (12 weeks), and follow-up assessment (24 weeks)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)
Time Frame: Reported weekly, as well as at baseline assessment, post assessment (12 weeks), and follow-up assessment (24 weeks)
Measuring psychological distress (depression and anxiety), Minimum value = 1 (per subscale), Maximum value = 5 (per subscale), Higher score = worse outcome
Reported weekly, as well as at baseline assessment, post assessment (12 weeks), and follow-up assessment (24 weeks)
Psychological Flexibility, Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI)
Time Frame: Reported at baseline assessment
Minimum value = 1 (per subscale), Maximum value = 6 (per subscale), Higher score = worse outcome
Reported at baseline assessment
The Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
Time Frame: Reported at post-assessment (12 weeks)
Minimum value = 1, Maximum value = 5, Higher score = better outcome
Reported at post-assessment (12 weeks)
Intervention Appropriateness Measure
Time Frame: Reported at post-assessment (12 weeks)
Minimum value = 1, Maximum value = 5, Higher score = better outcome
Reported at post-assessment (12 weeks)
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
Time Frame: Reported at post-assessment (12 weeks)
Minimum value = 1, Maximum value = 5, Higher score = better outcome
Reported at post-assessment (12 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Substance Use Timeline Followback Interview
Time Frame: Over the past 30 days
Over the past 30 days
HIV Risk Questionnaire
Time Frame: Reported at baseline assessment, post-assessment (12 weeks), and follow-up assessment (24 weeks)
Participants will be reporting number of sexual partners, types of sexual activities, and various HIV risk factors including condom use, PrEP use, and treatment as prevention
Reported at baseline assessment, post-assessment (12 weeks), and follow-up assessment (24 weeks)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PTSD Life Events Checklist for DSM-5
Time Frame: Reported at baseline assessment
Participants will indicate whether certain difficult or stressful life events they have experienced
Reported at baseline assessment
Intersectional Discrimination Index (InDI)
Time Frame: Reported at baseline assessment
Minimum value = 0, Maximum value = 13, Higher score = worse outcome
Reported at baseline assessment
Access to Gender Affirmation in Healthcare Questionnaire
Time Frame: Reported at baseline assessment, post-assessment (12 weeks), and follow-up assessment (24 weeks)
Minimum value = 1, Maximum value = 5 Higher score = Better outcome
Reported at baseline assessment, post-assessment (12 weeks), and follow-up assessment (24 weeks)
Need for Gender Affirmation Questionnaire
Time Frame: Reported at baseline assessment, post-assessment (12 weeks), and follow-up assessment (24 weeks)
Minimum value = 1, Maximum value = 5
Reported at baseline assessment, post-assessment (12 weeks), and follow-up assessment (24 weeks)
Satisfaction with Gender Affirmation Questionnaire
Time Frame: Reported at baseline assessment, post-assessment (12 weeks), and follow-up assessment (24 weeks)
Minimum value = 1, Maximum value = 5, Higher score = better outcome
Reported at baseline assessment, post-assessment (12 weeks), and follow-up assessment (24 weeks)
City Stress Index
Time Frame: Reported at baseline assessment
Minimum value = 0, Maximum value = 3, Higher score = worse outcome
Reported at baseline assessment
PCL-5
Time Frame: Reported at baseline, post-assessment (12 weeks), and follow-up assessment (24 weeks)
Minimum value = 0, Maximum value = 4, Higher score = worse outcome
Reported at baseline, post-assessment (12 weeks), and follow-up assessment (24 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 10, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Substance Abuse

Clinical Trials on The TLC Program

Subscribe