- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06843785
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Different Squat Exercises in Healthy Individuals
August 11, 2026 updated by: Doç.Dr.Ömer Şevgin, Uskudar University
Effects of Two Different Squat Exercise Patterns on Low Back Pain, Pressure Pain Threshold, Balance and Jump Performance in Young Adult Healthy Individuals
The aim of our study is to compare the effects of two different squatting patterns, with and without the knees passing the toes, on low back pain, muscle strength and balance.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
A total of 60 volunteer participants between the ages of 18-30, who are in the active category of the International Physical Activity Assessment Questionnaire Short Form, are planned to be included in the study.
Individuals participating in the study will be divided into 3 groups using using unrestricted (simple) randomization.
A random number was generated for each participant with the random-number functions of Microsoft Excel and participants were ordered by that number and assigned to the three groups.
No blocking or stratification was used and no formal allocation-concealment mechanism (such as sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes) was implemented.
Group I (n=20); squatting with the knees passing the toes (PI), Group II (n=20); squatting with the knees not passing the toes (PG) and Group III (n=20); control group (CG).
Squatting with the knees passing the toes (PI); squatting with the knees not passing the toes (PG) will be applied to the study groups as a home program for 6 weeks and will be checked with an exercise diary.
Participants will be re-evaluated at the end of the exercise program.
No training program will be applied to the control group and they will be asked to continue their daily lives and participants will be evaluated at 6-week intervals.
The training program of 1 set; 20 repetitions; 30 seconds active contraction/30 seconds rest is applied to the PI and PG groups 3 days a week, every other day for 6 weeks.
The training program of the groups is monitored by a physiotherapist for 6 weeks via telerehabilitation technologies.
All participants will be evaluated for back pain, knee pain, pressure pain threshold, low-back-related disability, self-reported knee function, dynamic balance, perceived exertion, and vertical-jump flight time, function and balance before and at the end of the program and the data obtained will be recorded.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
60
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
- Bahçeşehir Universtiy
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Being between the ages of 18-30,
- According to International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form Being physically active
- Not having any psychological, neurological, orthopedic and rheumatic disorders,
- Not having a history of fractures or surgeries affecting the lower extremities in the last year,
- Being able to do at least one traditional squat exercise
- Being able to communicate in Turkish (written and verbal) Exclusion criteria
- Being pregnant or suspected of being pregnant
- Knee valgus diagnosis
- Pes planus or pes cavus diagnosis in the foot
- Hip rotation diagnosis
- Strength deficit between two extremities
- A physician-diagnosed painful knee condition of recent onset
- Regular medication use or use of NSAIDs and similar disease-modifying drugs in the last month
- Intra-articular injection (hyaluronic acid/steroid) application in the last 6 months
- Having a comorbid disease that contraindicates exercise (advanced osteoporosis, vertigo, neurological diseases, etc.)
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: knee past toes squat
A squatting program with the desired characteristics will be applied
|
Participants are instructed to stand comfortably with feet pelvis-width apart and approximately 15-30° to the side with arms extended in front of them.
Participants are asked to squat to their most comfortable point, looking straight ahead, without heels leaving the floor, and to hold the position for 2 seconds before returning to the original standing position.
The distance between the hips and the floor is measured vertically using a ruler for squat depth.
Three trials are performed and the average of the three trials is used for further analysis.
|
|
Experimental: knee not past toes squat
A squatting program with the desired characteristics will be applied
|
In the limited squat exercise, the position of the most anterior part of the knee is not allowed to extend beyond the toes.
In the limited squat exercise, a wooden board is placed just distal to the first toe of each foot, and the 60 cm wide wooden board restricts knee movement.
Participants are instructed to stand comfortably with their feet pelvis-width apart and approximately 15-30° to the side, and their arms extended in front of them.
Participants are asked to squat to 90° of knee flexion, looking straight ahead, without the heels leaving the floor, and to hold the position for 2 seconds, then return to the original standing position.
Squat depth is determined by measuring 90° of knee flexion using a goniometer placed on the knee and measured vertically between the hip and the floor using a ruler.
Three trials are performed, and the average of the three trials is used for further analysis.
|
|
Active Comparator: control
No Intervention
|
Participants will not be subjected to any intervention and will not be asked to perform any action.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: 6 weeks (baseline and immediately post-intervention)
|
It was developed to evaluate the degree of loss of function in low back pain.
Items question pain severity, self-care, lifting and carrying loads, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, degree of pain change, travel and social life.
Under each item there are six statements in which the patient ticks the one appropriate to his/her situation.
The first statement is scored as "0" and the sixth statement is scored as "5".
When the total score is calculated, it is multiplied by two and expressed as a percentage.
The maximum score is "100" and the minimum score is "0".
As the total score increases, the disability level also increases.
|
6 weeks (baseline and immediately post-intervention)
|
|
Y balance test
Time Frame: 6 weeks (baseline and immediately post-intervention)
|
The test is a practical functional test that can predict dynamic balance and postural stability.
The player's performance improves with balance, flexibility, coordination and power integration.
For this test, players stand in the center of a 'Y' shaped arrangement with 3 lines drawn at certain angles.
The players are asked to reach in anterior, posterolateral and posteromedial directions using one foot.
Three applications are made in each direction and the average of the reach distances is recorded in centimeters.
Pre-measured leg length is used to normalize the mean score of these three treatments.
Percentage of maximum reach = deflection distance/leg length.
Leg length; Spina iliaca anterior superior to the distal point of the medial malleolus.
To obtain an overall measure of the Y Balance Test, data from all directions must be averaged to calculate the composite score.
|
6 weeks (baseline and immediately post-intervention)
|
|
International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form
Time Frame: 6 weeks (baseline and immediately post-intervention)
|
This questionnaire is a standardized tool for measuring physical activity, developed by researchers from various countries with the support of the World Health Organization (WHO) and Centers for Disease Control (CDC).
Questionnaire, four areas of physical activity; It covers work, transportation, housework/gardening, and leisure activities, but also includes questions about time spent sitting as an indicator of inactivity.
In each of the four areas, the energy expended in moderate and vigorous activities in the last 7 days, the number of days the activities were performed, and the number of activities performed during the day are recorded.
The times are multiplied by the Metabolic Equivalent (MET) values per activity, and the results for all items are added to form the overall physical activity score.
The question about sitting is not included in the physical activity score.
Classification is made in three categories as physically inactive (3000 MET min/week).
|
6 weeks (baseline and immediately post-intervention)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Amirkiya Movahhedi, Bahcesehir University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Kararti C, Ozsoy I, Ozyurt F, Basat HC, Ozsoy G, Ozudogru A. The effects of dynamic neuromuscular stabilization approach on clinical outcomes in older patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Somatosens Mot Res. 2023 Sep;40(3):116-125. doi: 10.1080/08990220.2023.2191705. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
- Slater LV, Hart JM. Muscle Activation Patterns During Different Squat Techniques. J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Mar;31(3):667-676. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001323.
- Desai I, Marshall PW. Acute effect of labile surfaces during core stability exercises in people with and without low back pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2010 Dec;20(6):1155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.08.003.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 1, 2025
Study Completion (Actual)
May 15, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2025
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 19, 2025
First Posted (Actual)
February 25, 2025
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 14, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 11, 2026
Last Verified
August 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Uskudar23
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
The anonymized participant-level dataset is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.