Microsurgical Robot-assisted Corneal Transplant (GRACE)

Graft Robot-Assisted Corneal Enhancement

Full-thickness corneal grafting (transfixing keratoplasty) is a tissue graft described at the beginning of the 20th century, which has remained technically unchanged for several decades. Around 900 transfixing keratoplasties are performed every year in France. This microsurgical procedure is intended for patients with severe corneal pathology that seriously impairs visual function, and for whom no therapeutic alternative - optical devices, medication or other surgical procedure - exists.

The initial anatomical outcome of surgery depends on the accurate execution of the corneal sutures. Very recently, a robot with microsurgical capabilities was developed by the MMI company (Symani® surgical system, now available from the Reims University Hospital). This robot is equipped with forceps and a needle holder capable of handling fragile tissues and microsurgical needles with an amplitude of movement greater than that of the human hand. It is operated by a surgeon via a wireless controller and foot pedal. It could thus be used to perform the usual sutures of a transfixing keratoplasty.

To our knowledge, no study to date has evaluated the contribution of a microsurgical robot to transfixing keratoplasty in humans. The Symani® microsurgical robot recently received CE marking for microsurgery. The investigators were able to carry out a series of ex vivo keratoplasties using the robot to suture non-conforming human corneas (destined for destruction), thus proving the feasibility of the procedure.

On the basis of this proof of concept, our project aims to evaluate the performance of robot-assisted transfixing keratoplasty in patients requiring corneal transplantation. Robotic assistance for human eye surgery, particularly corneal transplants, has never been evaluated. The use of a robot to perform corneal sutures during transfixing keratoplasty could equal or even surpass the performance of this crucial surgical step, which is conventionally performed manually. Ultimately, visual results could be equivalent or even better than those obtained after conventional surgery. At the same time, the use of the robot will be evaluated in terms of surgical cost, in order to obtain a quantified financial evaluation of robot-assisted keratoplasty.

Study Overview

• Status: Recruiting
• Conditions: Corneal Dystrophy
• Intervention / Treatment: Procedure: Robot-assisted keratoplasty

Detailed Description

Context Transfixing keratoplasty was developed in the early 20th century. The aim is to replace the entire central cornea with a corneal allograft. This microsurgical procedure is performed with the aid of an operating microscope, and under general anesthetic to ensure optimal control of the absence of movement and arteriovenous pressure throughout the procedure.

Suturing is therefore an essential part of transfixing keratoplasty. They determine the congruence of the tissue edges and the distribution of tension applied to the sutures, thus modulating the curvature (astigmatism) of the graft. This curvature will determine the optical properties of the eye, and hence its acuity and the patient's visual recovery. A topical immunomodulatory local treatment (corticosteroids and/or ciclosporin eye drops) is administered for several years; no systemic treatment is used. Sutures are usually removed 6 months to 1 year after surgery. Current indications are major declines in visual acuity - generally below 4/10 with the best possible correction - associated with i) severe keratoconus, the most frequent indication, ii) failed anterior grafts, iii) full-thickness central corneal scars, and iv) hereditary stromal dystrophies.

Robot-assisted surgery has developed considerably over the last twenty years, with procedures now routinely performed in macro- and endoscopic surgery (mainly urology, obstetrics and visceral surgery). Very recently, engineering advances in precision motion control and mechanical miniaturization have enabled the development of robots dedicated to microsurgery. The Symani® Surgical System (Medical MicroInstrument, Pisa, Italy) has been used and evaluated in animals and humans over the past two years for vessel and nerve microsurgery. The Symani® robot is equipped with forceps and a needle holder capable of handling fragile tissue, as well as microsurgical needles and wires (8/0 to 12/0). The Symani® robot has recently been CE-marked for microsurgery [appendix 1]. To date, there is only one study - ex vivo and in animals - on the feasibility of its use in ocular surgery. On the basis of the robot's capabilities and its CE mark, the investigators have carried out preliminary experiments, enabling us to envisage robot-assisted keratoplasty in humans.

On the basis of our preliminary results, the investigators hypothesize that it is possible to use the Symani® robot's assistance to perform the major surgical stage of transfixing keratoplasty, i.e. the sutures between the graft and the recipient cornea, in humans.

Objectives :

• Main:

  1. Evaluate the feasibility, and intraoperative intercurrent events of robotic assistance during transfixing keratoplasty,
  2. Identify possible early and late postoperative intercurrent events/adverse events related to robot use.

• Secondary :

  i) Evaluate the impact of robotic assistance during transfixing keratoplasty on postoperative corneal anatomical outcome (graft curvature).

ii) Assess the impact of robotic assistance on refraction and visual outcome in the medium term: 3 months iii) Evaluate the mean degree of astigmatism post robotic-assisted grafting, so as to be able to calculate the number of subjects required for a subsequent study of the superiority of robotic-assisted surgery over usual conventional surgery.

iiii) Evaluate the additional cost of robotic-assisted surgery. iv) Evaluate the quality of life before and 3 months after the intervention Type of study: pilot feasibility study, monocentric, interventional. Population: Ten consecutive adult patients requiring transfixing keratoplasty who agreed to participate by signing an informed consent form.

Investigation plan : The study will be offered to patients scheduled for penetrating keratoplasty. Clinical follow-up will be conducted at Day 1, Day 7, Day 30. Final clinical and paraclinical check-up at Day 90 and end of participation.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Estimated): 10
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

• Study Contact: Name: Alexandre DENOYER; Phone Number: 0033 0326787888; Email: adenoyer@chu-reims.fr

Study Locations

• France
  • Reims, France, 51092
    • Recruiting
    • CHU Reims
    • Contact: Damien JOLLY; Phone Number: 33 326788472; Email: djolly@chu-reims.fr

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: Adult
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

inclusion criteria :

• Patients of legal age seen in a specialized ophthalmology consultation at the Reims University Hospital, and requiring transfixing keratoplasty.
• Affiliated to a social security scheme
• Agreeing to take part in the study (information and signature of consent form).

exclusion criteria :

• Patients protected by law
• Patients with an ocular pathology other than their corneal pathology.
• Mentally incapable of adhering to the principles of the study.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: N/A
• Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

1

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Robot-assisted keratoplasty group; patients undergoing robot-assisted corneal transplantation	Procedure: Robot-assisted keratoplasty; Feasibility pilot interventional study. Monocentric, one arm. Microsurgical robot will be used to perform penetrating keratoplasty. During the procedure, the corneal sutures will be performed using symani surgical system, that is a microsurgical robot controlled by a surgeon

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Descriptive analysis of unusual events intra- and postoperatively	Number and percentage of unusual events	Day O (intraoperative) to Day 7
Descriptive analysis of unusual events	Number and percentage of unusual events	Day 7 to Day 90

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Postoperative corneal anatomical result	Anterior topographic will be performed and compare central astigmatism	Day 90
Visual acuity with correction	The mean diopters	Day 90
Visual acuity without correction	The mean diopters	Day 90
Corneal topographic regularity	Corneal topographic regularity measured by surface regularity index (SRI)	Day 90
Corneal topographic regularity	Corneal topographic regularity measured by surface asymmetry index (SAI)	Day 90
Subjective refraction	Measurement of spherical equivalent (SE)	Day 90
Subjective refraction	Measurement of refractive astigmatism (CYL)	Day 90
Analysis of surgical costs	cost of graft and materials used	Month 6
National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire	Quality of life - National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire	Day 90

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: CHU de Reims

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): June 6, 2025
• Primary Completion (Estimated): June 1, 2026
• Study Completion (Estimated): April 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: February 6, 2025
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 21, 2025
• First Posted (Actual): February 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): June 26, 2025
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: June 25, 2025
• Last Verified: June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Genetic Diseases, Inborn; Eye Diseases; Corneal Diseases; Eye Diseases, Hereditary; Corneal Dystrophies, Hereditary
• Other Study ID Numbers: PS25009*

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No